Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could America Have Lost the Revolutionary War?
National Security Journal ^ | 11/16/2025 | Robert Farley

Posted on 11/16/2025 4:54:24 PM PST by whyilovetexas111

Could Great Britain have crushed the American rebellion? An expert argues that, while better generalship and politics might have delayed defeat, the odds were stacked against London from the start. Holding a vast, underdeveloped continent with a small population, across an ocean, was a nightmare even for Europe’s strongest navy and army. Saratoga and French intervention made things worse, forcing Britain to fight a global war while trying to subdue the colonies. In the end, distance, imperial overreach, and political inflexibility meant the empire was likely to lose North America sooner or later.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalsecurityjournal.org ...


TOPICS: Government; History; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: globalwar; military; politics; propaganda; revisionism; revisionisthistory; ushistory; war; worldwar

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: GOPJ

That is the way I see it. It is not hard to read the account of us being surprised by the British and trying to withdraw across Long Island Sound, when the entire British fleet showed up. Had there not been that fog, there would have been no escape.

We would have been crushed right there.

The world is full of “Ifs” and “Buts”. If Ifs and Buts were coconuts, we would all be drinking Pina Coladas.

Or, in a more general way, If frogs had wings, they wouldn’t whomp their ass every time they jumped.

Sometimes, things just are.


21 posted on 11/16/2025 5:39:19 PM PST by rlmorel (Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DeplorablePaul

The Islamic rebels used the exact same guerilla tactics to defeat the Russians and Americans in A-stan. The North Vietnamese did it too. Eventually the imperial powers exhausted and bankrupted themselves and gave up. Successful wars have to be won fast.


The cases you cite, and the American revolution were won in large part because of massive amounts of aid to the rebels by foreign sources. In the Colonies, it was the French, for the Russians in Afghanistan it was the USA, the Chinese, and the Oil Sheiks. For us in Afghanistan is was the Iranians, and Chinese, and maybe some oil sheiks (and the Democratic Party in the USA, Biden).

The British successfully stopped the Mutiny/Rebellion in 1857 in India. They were brutal. Socialism/Rosseau took root in Britain, and they lost the ability to be brutal in the colonies when they needed to.


22 posted on 11/16/2025 5:39:45 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica
"...The left historians seek so badly to entirely erase the American Revolution that gave birth to the Revolutionary War and thus the Founding itself. Transforming the narrative to a global one further obfuscates, abstracts, and omits the Founding Fathers..."

This IS their modus operandi, after all.

23 posted on 11/16/2025 5:41:11 PM PST by rlmorel (Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

General Howe was not at the Battle of Yorktown. The British lost because they didn’t have “No Howe”.


24 posted on 11/16/2025 5:43:49 PM PST by DesertRhino (When men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

You don’t have to “win” a revolt. All you have to do is be enough of a pain in the butt for long enough that the outfit that is being revolted against decides it isn’t worth it.


25 posted on 11/16/2025 5:45:05 PM PST by FrozenAssets (You don't have to be crazy to live here, but it helps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Bo, because GOD fought for us.


26 posted on 11/16/2025 5:47:42 PM PST by cowboyusa ( YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA AND HE WILL HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE HIM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

We’d all be speaking Canadian!


27 posted on 11/16/2025 5:48:18 PM PST by silverleaf (“Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out” —David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

It has been losing the revolution since the early 1900s...
Particularly, every time another democrat and/or Marxist was elected to a political office...

The Faunders of the former Republic would have revolted again when the 16th and 17th were enacted...

IMHO, they would have revolted again when Lincoln started the Civil War...


28 posted on 11/16/2025 5:50:28 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is rabble-rising Sam Adams now that we need him? Is his name Trump, now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EvilCapitalist

Imagine if he had held out through the night at Ft Necessity/Great Meadow and outlasted/defeated the French who were running out of ammo….with Gen Braddock dead George Washington might have become a British war hero.

Glad he lost though….it helped make him the military leader America needed a decade later


29 posted on 11/16/2025 5:53:06 PM PST by silverleaf (“Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out” —David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica
The consensus among hard left wing historians seems to be trying to completely re-make the Revolutionary War into actually the first World War/global war.

I actually think the Seven Years War (1756-1763) was the first global war. It was fought in five continents! The Seven Years War was more of a world war than World War I.

30 posted on 11/16/2025 5:54:19 PM PST by Right_Wing_Madman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Yup.


31 posted on 11/16/2025 5:58:30 PM PST by EvilCapitalist (Pets are no substitute for children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Well, at the start of the War of Independence the percentage of those citizens that endorsed the idea of independence remained an apathetic 26%. The 26% consisted mostly of merchants and business owners. As it became evident that Washington had a pretty good chance (with Franklin’s alliance with the French), the deplorable peasants got on board.


32 posted on 11/16/2025 6:04:59 PM PST by blackdog ((Z28.310) "Diggin the scene with a gangster lean" (Mayfield, Curtis) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111
Imagine what could have been...

Well, the War of 1812 comes to mind.

33 posted on 11/16/2025 6:11:14 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scrabblehack
Didn’t Bill Cosby point this out already?

Yeah, the British lost because they had to wear red and march in a straight line.

34 posted on 11/16/2025 6:13:44 PM PST by chaosagent ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

It was possible that Britain could have won had George Washington, Benjamin Franklin and Benedict Arnold had never been born.


35 posted on 11/16/2025 6:13:59 PM PST by Thud (quot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Just found out a couple of my hubs ancestors fought in the Long Island Battle...one was “acquainted” with George Washington, and other Generals.


36 posted on 11/16/2025 6:14:05 PM PST by goodnesswins (Make educ institutions return to the Mission...reading, writing, math...not Opinions & propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Stark and his squirrel shooters


37 posted on 11/16/2025 6:20:33 PM PST by bunkerhill7 (Don't shoot until you see the whites of their lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

America didn’t win the war, the English lost it. Not at all the same thing. The Colonials simply held on until the English had bigger fish to fry and were forced to let them go.

The French lost it, too, even though it wasn’t their war. Support for the American Revolution was one of the major contributors to France’s choking debts. And Louis XVI’s debt crisis was the chief cause of the French Revolution.

Plus the message the French commoners took from the Americans was that it was possible for a ragtag army to throw off even the greatest military power in the world.


38 posted on 11/16/2025 6:22:12 PM PST by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

They could shoot an acorn out of a squirrel’s paws at 200 yards


39 posted on 11/16/2025 6:22:53 PM PST by bunkerhill7 (Don't shoot until you see the whites of their lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Revere was only one of many colonial couriers that night.


40 posted on 11/16/2025 6:24:25 PM PST by Thud (quot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson