Posted on 09/16/2025 9:42:58 AM PDT by TigerClaws
Why isn’t this question being asked?
Document at link. Text:
From the documents (and no verification they are real yet):
“The content of these messages included messages affiliated with the contact ‘Tyler’ stating a need to retrieve a rifle from a drop point, leaving the rifle in a bush, messages related to visually watching the area where a rifle was left, a message referring to having left the rifle wrapped in a towel. The messages also refer to engraving bullets, and a mention of a scope and the rifle being unique. Messages from the contact Tyler also mention that he had changed outfits.”
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Not to worry — it will all come out. As soon as the information about Crooks is released.
He had help.
He brought the rifle with him. He left it in the bush on the way out.
I have yet to hear what caliber bullet struck Charlie Kirk.
“I have yet to hear what caliber bullet struck Charlie Kirk.”
Threads have been posted several times months subject.
I’m going to try one more time to post this former Marine sniper’s analysis. Once the moderator shot it down and the other post produced no comments. After watching this analysis, can you explain the bullet exit wound in the left front throat area under the current scenario?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltakvGyzfZs
We’ve all seen the video of Tyler Robinson dropping to the ground off the building. I have never been able to detect a rifle being dropped.
Nancy Pelosi.
What is your point? That there were two shooters?
Indeed, no rifle in hand, and, on the basis of his obvious agility, not up his pant leg either.
The simple question is how to explain a frontal EXIT wound when the narrative is that the shooter took the shot from the front. Where is the bullet and where is the autopsy report?
The FBI said that there was DNA evidence on the rifle from the shooter. Also there was DNA evidence on the roof. So we know the shooter held the rifle and was at the spot of the shooting. Now I guess you could say that the shooter touched another rifle with one slug missing and that rifle was put in the bush. But that does not seem to hide anything but the real rifle, and what is the point of that. And where is the real rifle if its not that one.
What object is it then, he is dropping something.
We’ve had this discussion a number of times on FR, if you watch the slowed down version of the video, you can clearly see the shooter was wearing a backpack and had something long wrapped in a towel, he dropped, picked it up when he hit ground and ran off with it.
I’m starting to believe a bunch of crackpots on YouTube are putting out crazy conspiracy theories about the shooter not having a gun, exit wounds in the neck from a different angle than the person arrested for shooting Charlie Kirk, the purpose I think is to put enough crazy ideas out in public to keep people running around like crazy to distract them from the obvious.
Good point. He couldn’t have done that with a rifle up his pant leg.
There was no rifle seen being dropped from the roof before he dropped to the ground.
It really is that simple, he dropped the gun wrapped in a towel or something similar, picked it up and ran off, he dropped the gun in the bushes, perhaps to a designated spot for later retrieval.
I think some of these crazy conspiracy theories are being put out in public to distract people from asking tougher questions.
It might have been the bag but an assembled rifle would not fit in that bag/backpack.
I’ve missed the discussions on FR because I’m not glued to FR 24/7. Thanks for that information.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.