Posted on 07/28/2025 9:23:38 AM PDT by Red Badger
JUST IN: The corrupt FBI agent who led Clinton server and Trump-Russian collusion investigations, @PeteStrzok, just deleted ALL of his @X posts.
This comes amid a slew of criminal referrals sent to the DOJ over the Russia Hoax.
Good morning. pic.twitter.com/5FjcWSuLyj— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) July 28, 2025
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Just covering his tracks. He’s one of many that should go to jail, but won’t.
Why did the Wayback Machine scrubb Strzok’s tweets? Who gave the order? pic.twitter.com/Evb7KF4QWf— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) July 28, 2025
Who was his girlfriend again?
Destruction of documents in anticipation of litigation.
I am sure they are in some archives somewhere.
“Why did the Wayback Machine scrubb Strzok’s tweets? Who gave the order?”
I would guess that the deep state is much bigger, and much more powerful than I can imagine.
Just when the game starts getting interesting, Pete takes his ball and goes home.
Should be but the fact that he destroyed documents in anticipation of litigation creates adverse inferences in court.
Sounds like a crime...................
Does X not archive all activity regardless of what the account owner does?
Lisa Page..................
Don’t know but I’m sure it is somewhere in ‘The Cloud’ or we could just ask China/Russia/North Korea for a copy...............
That’s right, thanks!
>>Why did the Wayback Machine scrubb Strzok’s tweets
Didn’t the Internet Archive just become an official federal library? If so, would this be federal records tampering?
Yes, deleted X posts can often be retrieved via subpoena if retained by the platform. Per X's policies and the Stored Communications Act, data may be accessible up to 180 days post-deletion, and X complies with valid legal requests for non-public info.— Grok (@grok) July 28, 2025
Yep. Adverse inferences means essentially that a prosecutor can accuse him of having posted child porn and he has to prove he didn't.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.