Posted on 07/09/2025 10:31:48 AM PDT by DFG
Attorney General Pam Bondi is in hot water today after the Epstein list that was "on her desk" a few months ago somehow went missing. Before you start attacking Bondi though, consider these seven totally reasonable explanations for what might have happened:
1. Bondi threw it away because she saw the list included every single person living in Hollywood and D.C. and realized there must be some mistake: Obviously.
2. Bondi meant she had Epstein's Spotify list: It was a simple misunderstanding.
3. She really had the list, but her dog ate it, and she was going to try to piece it back together, but then some Haitians ate the dog: Happens all the time.
4. She actually meant she had the list of clients for Marvin Epstein, a dentist from Brooklyn: It all makes sense.
5. Bondi was carrying the Epstein list when she accidentally bumped into a super cute guy who it turns out is a young Santa Claus and somehow the lists got switched in a romantic "Christmas List Swap": Coming to the Hallmark Channel soon!
6. The Epstein list is really just a metaphor for the trauma in each person's past: So powerful.
7. Bondi is actually still going to release the Epstein list, but she's going to have some influencers shoot the pedophiles' names out of t-shirt cannons and the cannons are on backorder: Hooray!
See, it all adds up. Don't be so hard on Pam.
She thought she had Epstein’s list, but it really was Vinny Barbarino’s. Epstein’s mother sent Bondi a note explaining Blondi’s mistake.
I think he visited Elon this weekend.
He has earned my trust, so I’ll assume his motives are pure Forced and wait for an explanation.
No matter how they approached the chrono visor, the outcome was the same. Release the list of names, lose congress then the presidency to the dems. Eliminating the Epstein narrative from the public media actually led to the least damage to the USA. Unbelievable
With that many victims, awarded that much compensation so far, there cannot be any assertions that there was no crime, there were no perpetrators, Epstein wasn't involved, etc etc etc. Semantic games about a "list" are irrelevant. Those 150 sex crime victims have all named names, and those people should be getting perp-walked ASAP. Period.
“so I’ll assume his motives are pure and wait for an explanation.”
What pure motive lets America coverup for some child molesting by politicians and rich people? I cannot imagine a single motive for that which could be pure. Not one...
If there were no crimes, and therefore, no list of clients, then why;
Is Ghislane Maxwell in prison for human trafficking and being a pimp?
Why did SDNY go to the mat and refuse to turn the records over to the DOJ and force an FBI raid on NY FBI hq?
Why was the prosecutor in the Florida case told to back off because Epstein was intelligence connected?
If there was no list, why did Biden, Trump and Obama hide it so long?
If as Blondie said, there were tens of thousands of child porn videos, were they all of Epstein doing all the sexing and recording of himself?
Silliness... we are being lied to.
It’s obvious the list includes people on both sides of the aisle, and probably people like Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, etc.
They are hiding who is who... so it’s pretty obvious that our government is still operating under Mossad/CIA blackmail right now.
You’re right - there’s no pure motive for covering up for child molesting.
But there can be a pure motive for withholding information from the general public or leaking false information during an investigation. This is done all the time, because if investigators don’t know who the guilty parties are, then the only way to feed false information to them is to feed false information to the general public. Conversely, the only way to withhold information from the guilty parties is to withhold it from the public.
So, perhaps the FBI leaked that there was a client list in order to flush out the guilty parties or induce them to cut deals.
And come to think of it - wasn’t Epstein supposedly killed because of what he knew that could incriminate powerful people? If the FBI had a list and hard evidence against those on the list, then what good would it do to kill Epstein?
A lot of things don’t add up - but the most compelling thing for me is the idea that guys like Patel, Bongino and Trump himself would descend on Washington DC, vowing to expose this, and then when they are in a position to see what’s actually there, turn around e part of the cover-up.
Occam’s Razor - the simplest explanation is that Bondi, Patel, Bongino and Trump are telling the truth.. turns out the FBI never had client list - just tons of child porn - proving crimes were committed, but not proving who committed them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.