Posted on 06/08/2025 8:01:25 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
It has long been acknowledged that the United States’ energy infrastructure isn’t particularly secure, a concern exacerbated by the lack of a central planning process for our nation’s piecemeal electric grid. Presidential administrations and Congress have been slow to address the problem, apparently daunted by the mere size and scope of the challenges the needed upgrades would present.
That needs to change now. The recent news that China apparently installed hidden “kill switches” in solar equipment sold to the U.S. was the latest in a long list of reasons to be concerned about our electricity infrastructure and the foolhardy rush to replace traditional energy sources with so-called “renewables” using technology that is often sourced from China.
As Reuters reported, “Rogue communication devices not listed in product documents have been found in some Chinese solar power inverters by U.S experts who strip down equipment hooked up to grids to check for security issues … Using the rogue communication devices to skirt firewalls and switch off inverters remotely, or change their settings, could destabilize power grids, damage energy infrastructure, and trigger widespread blackouts, experts said.”
As one source summarized it, “That effectively means there is a built-in way to physically destroy the grid.” Or, to put it in even simpler terms, the U.S. is purchasing Chinese equipment complete with a “kill switch” that would allow China to disable the U.S. power grid at any moment.
Even more concerning, the problem is not relegated to the United States. Britain’s GB News reported, “Chinese companies dominate the market for power inverters, with firms like Huawei and Sungrow controlling more than half the market in 2023, according to Wood Mackenzie research. The European Solar Manufacturing Council estimates that more than 200 gigawatts of European solar power capacity relies on Chinese-made inverters.” (One gigawatt is equal to one billion watts.)
As Christoph Podewils, the council’s secretary general, put it, “This means Europe has effectively surrendered remote control of a vast portion of its electricity infrastructure.”
The Chinese embassy in Washington dismissed the allegation.
The relatively sparse news coverage of this startling discovery is evidence of either the mainstream media’s complacency, or its intentional effort to downplay any development that might contradict its radical climate change narrative. Surely, this item led the evening newscasts on ABC, CBS and NBC, right? Sadly, no.
If ever there was a wakeup call regarding the urgent need for the U.S. to be even more committed to energy independence, it has arrived in the form of China’s ability to remotely turn off the U.S. power grid.
Fortunately, President Trump is working hard to reverse the Biden administration’s disastrous mandates that would have replaced affordable, reliable and increasingly clean traditional energy sources with untrustworthy and costly alternatives. Trump’s early declaration of a national energy emergency defined the dangers of relying on foreign sources of energy and spelled out several needed steps, including upgrades to our energy infrastructure.
But the added knowledge of Chinese subterfuge embedded within crucial components being installed in the U.S. electric grid adds even more urgency to the need to not only produce more domestic energy, but also to domestically develop more technology and manufacture more of the parts we currently import from outside U.S. borders.
While U.S. security experts should be lauded for discovering the Chinese “kill switches,” how many security threats have gone undetected? So-called “renewable” technologies like wind and solar were already suspect in regard to their reliability, as evidenced by the recent massive grid failure in Spain, Portugal and parts of France. We should be all the more wary of “alternatives” when the parts used to connect them to our power grids are sourced from foreign adversaries.
The episode again highlights the vital need for tougher regulations to ensure our nation’s energy security. The Empowerment Alliance’s model legislation – the Affordable, Reliable and Clean Energy Security act (ARC-ES) – would require “energy sources that are primarily produced within the U.S. and infrastructure that will reduce our reliance on foreign nations for critical materials and manufacturing.”
The time has passed for any reasonable argument suggesting that such legislation is not urgently needed, both at the federal and state levels. The notion of attacks from foreign adversaries on America’s energy infrastructure has often been the stuff of fantasy and “what-if” scenarios. Those have now been replaced with concrete evidence of nefarious, embedded components from a foreign superpower, just waiting for someone in Beijing to flip a switch and send Americans hurtling into a powerless abyss.
Let it sink in: China was secretly embedding technology in components shipped to the U.S. that could have triggered a massive power outage.
It’s time for Congress to embed a “kill switch” of its own on the ability of foreign countries to disable the U.S. power grid. That assurance can only come when we take America’s energy independence from being a worthy goal to a mandated reality.
My back-up home generator wants to be hooked up to wi-fi. No way. The manufacturer (Generac) keeps sending me offers for a “free” extended warranty if I hook it up to wi-fi.
Thought the kill switch meant about the Chinese Communists who endangered our lives by their sabotage.
But it was merely about the power system. Oh, well.
This might be concerning if solar power actually produced a significant, or even noticeable, amount of our energy supply. It doesn’t, so it isn’t.
Green New Deal plan the whole time.
Eh, no. The solar contribution, while small, is enough that its sudden loss could destabilize the rest of the grid.
The national electrical grid is not some massive unified system that can withstand any sudden shock. It's a mishmash of lots of individual grids which are like rafts floating on the ocean, tied together with strings made of software, constantly adjusting their generation to keep up with changing loads. It's a very active, dynamic system of electrical regulation, and it has limits of what it can deal with.
Read up on the many regional blackouts that have happened as a result of individual generation plants suddenly having a problem, and the cascading domino effect of that rippling through large section of the grid, taking down additional generation plants.
Solar might still be small, but it may be enough to screw up the country.
2) Reasons like this article’s main point is part of why I chose solar inverters designed and made in the U.S. by a veterans owned company.
3) When I open the front panel of the inverters there’s a sticker the manufacturer put there saying “Soli Deo glorial” — to God alone be the glory. My solar installer and I were pleasantly surprised to see it.
bkmk
This might be concerning if solar power actually produced a significant, or even noticeable, amount of our energy supply. It doesn’t, so it isn’t./
Behold today’s Narrative as issued by the F.R. assigned Narrative Control Cubicle.
A blatant diversion from the actual issue, a single CCP solar back door into the non solar part of the grid can bring the whole grid crashing down.
Nice try comrade.
Or simply that most of them are Fellow Travelers hoping to be rewarded for their tactical silence after the Revolution.
Solar doesn't make sense at grid-scale, IMO. I'm a strong proponent of small-scale local solar (residential/business). Large-scale (community), not so much. Grid-scale, not at all.
> 2) Reasons like this article’s main point is part of why I chose solar inverters designed and made in the U.S. by a veterans owned company. When I open the front panel of the inverters there’s a sticker the manufacturer put there saying “Soli Deo glorial” — to God alone be the glory. My solar installer and I were pleasantly surprised to see it.
That's great.
I built my first home power PV system in 1989 with Solarex panels and a mid-size Trace Engineering inverter. 1998 added a reconditioned Jacobs wind machine, upgraded to a larger Trace inverter (4KW), and added more panels in 2016. Trace was eventually bought by Xantrex; last I knew they were still producing a similar inverter.
That’s awesome! Does your solar still work after the 2016 upgrade?
Yep. I sold the property in 2023 to a couple who wanted an off-grid, self-sufficient place. AFAIK they've only had to replace the batteries, which were big wet lead/antimony cells, over 20 years old so that's not surprising. The panels, even the 35+ year old Solarex ones, are still cranking it out. The inverter's 25+ years old and still chugging along just fine.
I also assume a 3% inflation rate in the energy costs I avoid in the future, but a 1.5% degradation rate in my solar equipment. Each month this is quickly calculated by adding a row to a worksheet in an Excel file with info from the power bill, an odometer reading of my EV, the gasoline price at the nearest gas station, the latest natural gas price for the month, and one query in my SQL DB from an export from my inverters (showing among other things how much power I consumed that month, the load, and compared to how little of that had to be pulled from the grid).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.