Posted on 01/15/2025 4:19:28 AM PST by TigerClaws
California’s governor Gavin Newsom was confronted while being probed at a press conference over the state’s spending of $24 billion to tackle homelessness.
Mr Newson led a conference on Friday announcing that California’s budget deficit is at least $45 billion and proposed various spending cuts to state worker jobs, education programs and health services.
He also proposed reducing funding for homelessness and housing initiatives by nearly $1.2 billion, including $474 million from an anti-foreclosure program to preserve existing affordable housing.
Despite the big budget announcements and slashes on spending, one reporter at the conference did not allow the governor to skim over the topic of homelessness in the state.
In a state audit, released in early April, it was revealed that California spent $24 billion to tackle homelessness over the past five years, yet did not consistently track how exactly the huge sum of money helped the homeless crisis.
Angela Hart, of KFF Health News, asked two questions: whether he felt his administration did enough to determine if the money was well spent and if he was worried whether public opinion over spending so much on the homelessness program has soured given the lack of progress from all the billions of dollars spent.
Mr Newsom replied with a lengthy answer about localism, and how it is “difficult at state level” to deal with these issues when local governments have different strategies, but touched on how they have incorporated “accountability plans” into their Housing Assistance Program (HAP).
He added that the audit did not “surprise” him and said that he acknowledged they needed to do more “not just in the homeless bucket but also the mental health/homelessness bucket”.
However, Ms Hart came back to the governor after his response saying, “I’m sorry, governor, I didn’t hear responses to either of those questions.”
“Well, forgive me if I appear to repeat the first response,” the governor started off by saying.
He reiterated that the audit “did not surprise” him and explained that California has taken part in “unprecedented investments” and, with that “unprecedented interventions”, such as demanding more accountability over local governments on how they are spending state money.
He reiterated that he initially rejected plans surrounding an accountability framework as he believed there was not enough accountability nor ambition in them. California’s governor Gavin Newsom unveils his revised 2024-25 state budget during a news conference in Sacramento on 10 May California’s governor Gavin Newsom unveils his revised 2024-25 state budget during a news conference in Sacramento on 10 May (AP)
He then said they had created a “housing accountability unit” and wanted to incorporate homelessness into that for further accountability over state funding.
He also said that in other areas, they have proposed to “foundationally reform an existing stream of funding to provide more transparency and state oversight” of how local governments are spending.
Moving on to Ms Hart’s second question over whether the public may be sceptical about spending further on homelessness, Mr Newsom said: “As it relates to the public mood, no question, more is not always better; they want to see results.”
He then listed off some “demonstrable” examples of where California has been taking action against homelessness, such as the “national model” encampment resolution grants and an amicus brief he filed with the United States Supreme Court concerning the homelessness encampments in March.
In a statement on the brief, the governor said: “The United States Supreme Court can establish a balance that allows enforcement of reasonable limits on camping in public spaces, while still respecting the dignity of those living on our streets.”
Ms Hart thanked him for his answer, calling it “thorough” before questioning Mr Newsom over other budget areas.
The tension over whether California is doing enough toward homelessness rose further after the audit’s release in April. An estimated 171,000 people are homeless in California, which amounts to roughly 30 per cent of all of the homeless people in the US. However, without a clear dataset, it is unclear how much of the $24bn helped towards the situation.
Without reliable and recent data on its spending, “the state will continue to lack complete and timely information about the ongoing costs and associated outcomes of its homelessness programs,” the audit stated.
California funds more than 30 programs to tackle homelessness, with the audit assessing only five initiatives.
However, the audit found that only two of them – the efforts to turn hotel and motel rooms into housing and housing-related support programs – are “likely cost-effective”.
The other programs, which received collectively $9.4 billion since 2020, did not have enough data to be fully assessed, the report says.
Posted so some reporter/blogger here could dive into these missing funds.
Apparently, a group registered in the Cayman Islands, called "Chelsea Investment Corp" is behind these deals.
Who owns it? Where's the money actually going?
Saw a post online about it. San Diego Housing Authority lent the Cayman company money.
Newsom needs to be investigated as homelessness is out of control and the taxpayer money went somewhere other than to fix the problem.
It was used to build magnificent homes that burned to the ground.
maybe it was used to buy HIS new home @9 mill$’s
Gruesome Gov Newscum and Mayor dumBass — none better!! /s
they gave all the money to illegal aliens
$24 billion? No wonder Newsom owns some Panera Bread restaurants.
Has he opened Los Pollos Hermanos yet? Could explain the shoulder dance.
“Isn’t he connected to the Pelosi crime family?”
Distant relation to Paul Pelosi. Not in Nancy’s bloodline.
“Newsom is the second cousin, twice removed, of musician Joanna Newsom. Newsom’s aunt was married to Ron Pelosi, the brother-in-law of former speaker of the United States House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi.”
$24,000,000,000 will buy a lot of needles and drugs.
My friends you have to look at how he could get away with this kinda stuff for so long. You only have to look at BJ and Obama. Both built careers on talking fast to the unwashed. There are more of them than there are achievers. Obama was considered a safe black man by keeping his pants on.
It’s a messiah they look for. They can dream about being one of them-similar to buying a lotto ticket.
Fart sniffers-all of them.
It well go a long ways to allow people to remain homeless.
Slick POS domestic enemy.
Who are STILL criminals who hate the US and will NEVER assimilate
KCAL had a story about it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQxkRc4ruI0
There was a state audit and can’t explain where the twenty billion+ went.
Looks like some of it was the Cayman...
My hunch is that nearly all $24B ended up in the hands of NGOs.
NGOs have three main purposes:
1. Virtue signaling that a problem is being “worked”, thus providing cover for politicians. However, in reality, the problem is often being intentionally made worse to subvert any policy that is even remotely conservative.
2. Provide comfortable, and sometimes lavish, lifestyles for liberal activists.
3. Launder money back to the Democratic party
they, elected officials, create huge pools of money for what most see as worthy causes but the problems never go away because much of the money gets looted by the very same people in the government that created the pool of money. It never fails and no one is ever investigated when the money goes missing as the problems it was suppose to help only gets worse. The Kalifornia’s political class is nothing more than a criminal enterprise, as is DC.
Story about $1.3 Los Angeles homelessness budget with Mayor Karen “The Joker” Bass with that odd smile on her face....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxJB0jDOJhM
Thanks for the info!
Some stories to get the reporter/blogger started:
For the second time in two years, the city of San Diego has nixed a plan to transform a city-owned lot at Seventh Avenue and Market Street downtown.
The city’s economic development director notified developer Chelsea Investment Corp. in December that it wouldn’t move forward with a hoped-for 405-unit affordable housing project following months of negotiations.
Now Mayor Todd Gloria’s office says it’s pressing pause and waiting on the market to improve before it pursues a multi-use project at the lot close to Petco Park and the Gaslamp Quarter.
https://yournews.com/2025/01/10/3099094/city-cans-another-7th-market-development-plan/
Company website:
https://www.chelseainvestco.com/
Gov. Newsom just bought a $9,100,000 Bay Area mansion to relocate his family — and kept their $3,700,000 home near Sacramento
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.