Posted on 11/26/2024 8:16:58 AM PST by bitt
NATO Military Committee Chairman Admiral Rob Bauer from The Netherlands discussed the need for preemptive strikes on Russia in the event of armed conflict.
Joe Biden and NATO are hoping for all-out war with Russia, the world’s second largest nuclear power, before President Trump enters office in January.
Tucker Carlson calls these recent developments the most evil thing he has seen in his lifetime.
JUST IN: Preemptive strike against Russia should be considered, NATO Military Committee Chairman says. pic.twitter.com/R2oQTKQaTU
— BRICS News (@BRICSinfo) November 25, 2024
The EurAsia Daily reported:
NATO is discussing the possibility of preemptive precision strikes on the territory of Russia in the event of an armed conflict with the alliance countries. This was stated at a conference in Brussels by the head of the Military Committee of the bloc, Admiral Rob Bauer.
He called positive the fact that NATO has changed its attitude to the essence of the organization as a defense alliance, as well as the perception that it is necessary to “sit and wait for us to be attacked” and only then react.
“It is more competent not to wait, but to hit launchers in Russia in case Russia attacks us. A combination of precision strikes is needed that will disable the systems that are used to attack us, and we must strike first,” Bauer said, quoted by Bloomberg.
As reported by EADaily, the probability of a Russian attack on one of the NATO countries, including Poland or the Baltic states, is estimated to be low. This was stated in an interview with PAP by the head of the alliance’s Military Committee, Rob Bauer.
Glaucoma And Cataract Disappear! Vision Returns 99.7% In 6 Days
P
Let The Netherlands do this preemptive strike on their own.
A plan is one thing. Always have a plan. But implementing it in the nuclear age? Insanity.
No, forget it, warmongers.
These people are evil beyond reckoning. Anyone of them who launches a pre-emptive strike needs to be pilloried. During Clinton’s admin, the idea of limited regional nuclear war was raised.
There is no such thing as a limited nuclear war.
Is he related to Jack Smith, I wonder. Perhaps psychopaths resemble each other.
Bauer should be a farmer...
NATO is not at war with Russia. This is more bloviating.
The first one was.
Two bombs, two cities, and Japan had the good sense to surrender...
A man of action, like the other Bauer... Jack!
How many missing small children have seen that face in his basement shower?
Japan had a nuclear bomb program in the works. It was only 20 or 30 years away from developing a working device.
Keep poking the bear and Russia will be at war with us.
It's sorta like cutting off Japan's access to critical resources and then being surprised that they tried to sink our Pacific fleet at anchor...
But Japan did not have the nuclear capability for a counter strike.
I believe the discussion here is present day situations.
Have at it Robby old boy. We’re going to sit this one out.
Imagine if Japan had a few hundred nuclear weapons of its own.
Do you really think the Emperor would have surrendered—or would we be all be wandering around in wastelands today?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.