Posted on 09/15/2024 9:00:02 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Late last week, there was word that an ABC News whistleblower was set to expose both the network and the Kamala Harris presidential campaign for allegedly rigging the network's Sept. 10th debate in the Democrat nominee's favor and against former President Donald Trump. The information that they said would be revealed was that Harris was given advance notice on what questions would be asked, and that Trump would be fact-checked live.
Now, the whistleblower has released a sworn, notarized statement, which is dated Sept. 9, 2024--the day before the debate. They say the Kamala Harris campaign allegedly "restricted the scope" of the ABC News debate questions, that the campaign allegedly demanded that only Donald Trump would be fact-checked during the debate:
BREAKING.π¨
ABC News whistleblower swears under penalty of perjury that the Kamala Harris campaign dictated the terms of the questions during the presidential debate.
Furthermore, the Harris campaign insisted upon live "fact checking" of Donald Trump during the debate.
ABC News "fact checked" Trump at least five times and did not fact check Harris once, despite the Democratic candidate telling provable lies, such as the "fine people hoax" and the blo*dbath hoax."The whistleblower signed the affidavit in New York and has sent a copy to Speaker Mike Johnson, the notarized document states.
The unnamed individual states that he or she is in possession of secret recordings that will prove that ABC News rigged the presidential debate.
ABC News committed election interference. This is a MASSIVE scandal.
![]()
pic.twitter.com/vRvaOdgUlnβ Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) September 15, 2024
The whistleblower wrote:
I have worked for ABC news [sic] for over 10 years in various technical and administrative positions.
Since the acquisition ABC news [sic] in 1996, I have observed significant transformations there in the nature of news reporting at the organization. These changes suggest a shift from unbiased reporting to a model influenced by external factors.
They also clarified the purpose of releasing the statement and information, stating in the document that they "do not endorse Donald Trump in his capacity as candidate for President of the United States," but are sharing it "to address concerns regarding perceived biases within news reporting within my employer's debate that will be hosted on September 10, 2024."
They said that the Harris campaign "imposed restrictions on the scope of questioning." They allegedly included "no questions regarding the perceived health of President Joe Biden," "no inquiries related to her tenure as Attorney General in San Francisco," and "no questions concerning her brother-in-law, Tony West, who faces allegations of embezzling billions of dollars in taxpayer funds and who now may be involved in her administration if elected."
The whistleblower added that they sent several copies to themselves, and a copy has been sent to Speaker Mike Johnson. They also claim to have secret recordings buttressing the claim on the fact-checking stipulation, and "what questions were not to be asked under any circumstances," or the Harris campaign would not appear at the debate.
As this is a breaking story, RedState will provide updates as they become available.
Editor's Note: The story was edited for clarity after publication.
Read related:
Trump is right not to debate Harris again. Kam never answered nor replied properly to most of Trump’s questions or statements. Trump was setup.
Seems to me Trump could have brought up any of those topics himself.
The headline should say “Harris cheated”
Was the moderator “fact checking” agreed to before the debate or was it a surprise by ABC?
Kamala Harris campaign dictated the terms of the questions during the presidential debate.
And Trump still kicked her ass.
On these pages, I asked President Trump to ask, “Where was the National Guard on J6?” just before handing over the mic. Maybe more than one time, even.
(Pelosi’s responsibility, which she soulfully acknowledged ONLY LAST WEEK).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.