Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

M10 Booker: Don’t Let The U.S. Army Catch You Calling This A ‘Light Tank’
National Security Journal ^ | 7/15/2024 | Brent M. Eastwood

Posted on 07/17/2024 6:49:21 AM PDT by whyilovetexas111

Well, is it or isn’t it? Is this a light tank or a reconnaissance/observational vehicle? The M10 Booker has raised some eyebrows because it is not clear what role it will play in the future Army force.

It was formerly known as the vague-sounding “Mobile Protected Firepower” platform, prior to its unveiling in 2023.

At that point Army acquisition honchos regarded it as a “combat vehicle.”

Moreover, a U.S. Army general tried to put a finer point on the Booker during its public christening round table event, as reported by the Military Times last year. “[I]n the [U.S.] Army, the historical use of light tanks has been to perform reconnaissance functions. This is not a reconnaissance vehicle,” Major General Glenn Dean said. “It’s not actually a mission match [for a light tank].”

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalsecurityjournal.org ...


TOPICS: Government; History; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: defense; military; tanks; usarmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: whyilovetexas111

Wow.

Those brilliant generals rediscovered the Sheridan.

Maybe they’ll rediscover Armored Cavalry.


21 posted on 07/17/2024 9:45:50 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

The technology doesn’t exist yet to support the needed power to weight ratio for the batteries. Ideally, the batteries would power propulsion, communications/sensors and weapon systems.

The Booker ‘Light Tank’, even if current technology supported the concept, would have to cart along behind several semi-trailers of batteries to generate/maintain power.

Currently, APU’s handle some functions on our ‘Medium’ tanks, but they are limited by generating capacity and add weight to an already heavy vehicle.


22 posted on 07/17/2024 11:19:40 AM PDT by Thunder 6 (Panzer, los geht's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nuke_road_warrior

I recall that during WW2 the US Army used the M10 Tank Destroyer, armed with a 90mm main gun.

So... this is it’s ‘’grandson’’?


23 posted on 07/17/2024 11:31:29 AM PDT by jmacusa (Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

Ein Panzerjaeger.


24 posted on 07/17/2024 12:07:10 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
I recall that during WW2 the US Army used the M10 Tank Destroyer, armed with a 90mm main gun...

I believe the M10 TD mounted a high-velocity 76mm gun (FWIW)...

25 posted on 07/17/2024 12:10:16 PM PDT by Who is John Galt? ("...mit Pulver und Blei, Die Gedanken sind frei!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: allendale

“In a war against a technologically sophisticated opponent, land armored vehicles, naval surface combatants and helicopters are obsolete death traps.Many brave young people will die before the battleship admirals, the calvary generals and the defense industry bureaucrats at the Pentagon realize the obvious and confront reality. Sadly most will be generously pensioned off , live into their dotage and never be held accountable for their stupidity.”


I’m curious for your insights on how a technologically sophisticated land war without armored vehicle, surface combatants, and helicopters would be fought. Your scenario removes most of the most of USN/USMC from the equation, leaving only stealth aircraft and submarines for the fight.


26 posted on 07/17/2024 12:43:30 PM PDT by Bob Wills is still the king (Just a Texas Playboy at heart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Louiswu

Continental Seige Units, with infinite repeaters, fitted with Hellbore fusion pulse, starship cannons!


27 posted on 07/17/2024 7:41:59 PM PDT by skepsel ("A cat is more intelligent than people believe, and can be taught any crime", Mark Twain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Who is John Galt?

You’re correct.


28 posted on 07/17/2024 10:43:20 PM PDT by jmacusa (Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Who is John Galt?

Brand new and already leaking?


29 posted on 07/18/2024 11:04:51 AM PDT by Moltke (Reasoning with a liberal is like watering a rock in the hope to grow a building.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson