Posted on 04/16/2024 4:09:30 PM PDT by impimp
I put this on X and someone liked it and said it was “based”…so I reprint it here for my FRiends:
“corporate elites have no choice but to push for open borders because American women don’t make enough babies because American men aren’t masculine enough to make it so”
Seriously?
It’s because without television, there was nothing else to do after it got dark.
Also because women hadn’t been indoctrinated into competing with and hating men.
All with the same mother?
The birds and the bees had
this figured out until
the bees want to become
birds, and the birds want
to become bees. And killing
either before they get a
chance to stretch their
wings.
perhaps more sigma males are needed to inspire the correct behavior in women?
You need to see the surveillance in the webpage in my tagline. I have and it is unbelievably massive. It is that big because it is supporting a similarly massive intelligence operation, which has as its objective, taking the US down now.
Until you grasp that - a bigger intel operation than the CIA is running military grade psyops on the population, granularly, down to the community level, you do not know why what is happening is happening. You need to learn to see your local surveillance, and map it out in your mind from there.
yes
Excellent point…the pill causes a bias towards beta males. I tell my kids to never use contraception so that will help. But why do we ever subsidize the birth control pill for poor people? Governments need to get out of the business of societal suicide.
Poor people not having enough babies is one of the reasons corporate elites will push for open borders.
A rapidly growing or rapidly shrinking population each have disadvantages. I’m just trying to understand the pitfalls of us still being around 330 million people 100 years from now with a generally stable births+immigration = deaths+emmigration.
First, the corporations are not being forced to do anything. They are choosing to do it. It is not because there is a lack of workers but to increase the number of consumers for resources. This allows prices to go higher while the threat of moving what jobs there are entirely out of the country keep the citizen worker from kicking too hard for improved wages. For a recent example of this, Tyson foods shut down a meat processing facility, with legal workers, to open one up in another area with the announced intent of hiring illegals. This is not force, this is choice.
And with the number of illegals being imported demand is up so prices can rise. And most of the illegals are on various government programs meaning that they are not working at all. This is fine with the corporations. They are still consumers and, with the additional free time they have they can consume more.
Now on to your second claim about American women not making "enough" babies. They do. And would make more if they were allowed to marry at a younger age. But they can't. Because the importation of consumers causing inflation along with the depression of wages means that they are being told that they must attend collage to get a job that pays well enough so that they can help provide a nest for the offspring. Pink collar workers are not paid enough to contribute to the household budget in the amount that will allow the purchase of a home. So they take on debt to go to collage to become a white collar worker who will make enough to contribute to the buying of a home. However this means that they will not get married until their late 20s if everything goes perfectly. They will not have their first child until they are in their thirties. This will result in a maximum of three children.
The last of your statements was some misandric garbage about "because American men are not masculine". Part of what leads a man into becoming masculine is the taking on of responsibility. These usually come in the form of job, marriage and household. But we are back at the wage depression and price inflation. The man is no longer able to achieve these things with hard work at a blue collar job. He must go to collage to become a white collar worker. Which means that he is going to be delayed in moving into "job, marriage and household" part of life by at least four years. So once again, if everything goes totally perfectly for him, marriage to a white collar working female in his late 20s will result in kids in his thirties and probably a maximum of three but more likely only one or two children.
Now mind you this is if the American men and women you so disparage have everything go perfectly. Life rarely goes perfectly. A down turn in the job market or a rise in housing cost (caused by more consumers being imported) will result in even further delays in the production of children. Which means either only one child or zero children from the marriage.
That is not even to get into the world wide fertility decline.
So all of your statements are wrong.
Truly you agree with me…I appreciate your detailed response.
Female over education has been a big problem and I am glad you highlighted it. Government should NEVER subsidize female higher education (really it shouldn’t fund any higher education for males or females but I prefer to emphasize the female issue).
And why are you complaining about men finding it hard to make money? Men can produce sperm often until they are 70 so middle aged men need to marry 19 year old girls.
But I really don’t think there is much of a difference as far as businesses are concerned with a flood of illegals and a bunch of young poor people natively born. I definitely prefer a culture that the natives of a country actually make babies - God prefers it (go forth and multiply) and so does Darwin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.