Posted on 09/01/2023 11:35:52 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
Here is the tail end of an AMAZING interview with Washington Post columnist (and voice of the Deep State) Philip Bump. Perhaps he thought he would get a gushy softball interview with the owner of New York's Comedy Cellar, Noam Dworman. Unfortunately for Bump, Dworman did his homework and asked him (GASP!) hardball questions about the corruption of Hunter Biden and his dad. As you can see, Bump had a lot of trouble handling actual facts. The interview built up to the meltdown of the final crescendo which you see here.
You can see the entire revealing hour plus interview at the link below.
Live From The Table: Philip Bump Battles Hard on Hunter Biden
Hard to know. We hear so much about “unconscious bias” yet these people don’t see it in themselves. He says there’s “no evidence” but when presented with some he just dismisses it as “I don’t know what that could mean”. Ok. Isn’t that your job? How about you scratch beneath the surface? They’re not interested in doing so but then claim “there’s no evidence”.
It’s absurd. It’s not journalism.
Doing the work I couldn’t. Thanks. And there you have it. A textbook example of how these people delude themselves by believing they are ultra smart and sophisticated journalists while everyone else sees they are nothing more than a cheap propaganda prostitute being used up for the moment.
Yes. Couldn’t watch. Where’s the part he’s confronted with Joe Biden corruption.
“ No, skip to 13:00”
It’s only 7:45
READ the post and your confusion shall be resolved.
A lowlife, lying leftist scumbag and highly punchable POS.
Democrats have their own World, in which they believe their own hype.
So, if Bump was filibustering, somehow the frogspittle flying off his lips distracted you from the fact that Noam had directly laid out Archer's self-incriminating testimony -- including where Devon's attorney 'redirected' Archer's testimony in front of Congress, from the Democrat Goldman's 'examination' of Archer where Devon admitted Hunter had included VP Biden in his calculations of who would benefit IF Shulkin was removed from his Burisma prosecution -- versus the moment Noam showed that Archer's attorney withdrew Archer's prior assertion that Joe was the bagman, when re-questioned by Comer.
Note also that Comer was like George Foreman in that Archer beatdown. Note also that Tucker played Devon like a shitty Yale lacrosse scholarship pimp!
What that tells me -- much like Noam punching down on Bump -- is that you (a) lack even a basic understanding of the underlying facts that give you the credibility to participate in this discussion -- much like Bump; and (b) you watched maybe one minute from one of my links (likely 32:00) and quickly gave up because of your typical FReeptard negative attention span.
Go back to reading headlines and typing with your elbows, the kid's table is over there. The adults are having a serious discussion.
Or hook into Bump's Copium lofl...no one gives a f***...
Bump could see a check made out with “bribery” on the memo line, and even then he would say it was written under duress. He’s a shill for Marxists.
Typical psychotic narcissism from a fascist egomaniac at the Washington Post.
Gay
This shpuld be fun.
Philip Bump is execrable.
.
Yup. Heck they could have a video of Biden accepting a pile of cash, handing over a memo or sending an email saying “I will use my office as Vice President and then President to hinder investigation of your corruption,” and then proof Biden did exactly that (which we actually do have), and Bump would say it is some Trump or vast right wing conspiracy plot.
About the only thing Biden couldn’t get away with is killing a puppy on film (ref John Wick) in the Rose Garden. And I am not sure Bump wouldn’t try to “explain” that away.
Democrat Rules For Questioning Election Results
<><>Democrats “just know” it is “obviously illegal” to question when Democrats win elections
<><>but it becomes “an urgent defense of democracy” to question when a Republican wins.
<><>for example, Ga DA Fani Willis did not yet know the outcome of the 2020 election,
<><>ergo, it was ‘legal’ to question it, because she was worried a Republican might win,
<><>but once Democrat Biden (cough) “won,’ it now became “retroactively illegal” to question it,
<><>when a Repub questions Ga election results, they are naturally subject to harsh prosecutions.
Clearly, the monopoly on election results conversations is held by Democrats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.