Posted on 08/05/2023 6:12:56 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
So, I’m having a friendly debate with somebody about this “IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!” post by Mr. Trump…
My friend, a retired police officer, is a great guy, salt of the earth, etc. He thinks it’s an understandable representation of Trump’s frustration. And maybe it is. But the question remains, did Trump’s attorneys have the chance to see that post before he pushed “send”? Did anybody above the age of 14? Does anybody honestly think had his attorneys seen it, they’d have said, “Yes, Mr. President, we think that’s a really swell post; put that jazz up ASAP”? Does Donald Trump have a moral obligation to listen to his attorneys if they didn’t? Well, when you consider that his working-class supporters, through their small-dollar donations, are picking up his attorneys’ bills, I’d say he has some sense of obligation to try to help them win their case. I mean, good God, people.
What are we doing? The man isn’t somebody you would hire to do a really big and important job like running the largest hotel conglomerate in the world, based on his Truth Social posts alone. Well, we’re also not supposed to re-hire him to run the largest corporation in the history of the world, either. Not at this point. Not after what happened the last time.
I can anticipate the Trump swarm coming down on that statement and asking, what about what happened last time? He had the greatest economy in history, the cheapest gas ever, no world wars, et cetera, et cetera. Fine, but he also shut down the economy and took the repeated advice of two of the most destructive public health bureaucrats in the country, if not the world. Their advice led to some of the most profoundly destructive economic and social impacts the world has seen in decades, if not in a century.
I truly think we need to go back to Herbert Hoover signing the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act in 1930, which caused the Great Depression, to find an equivalent level of presidential mistake.
President Trump agreed to shut down the U.S. economy because of a healthcare panic; the most important, dynamic, complex, and successful market economy on the planet, due to a bad virus, was Hooverian in its depths of disastrousness. And this, of course, also resulted in other developed economies following suit, some even more violent economically and socially than we did. I don’t think that is a hyperbolic statement. I think it is a fair and accurate statement.
Let’s be brutally clear. Hoover’s well-intended but wrongheaded policy caused the Great Depression, and we know how that all went. Equally true, Trump’s well-intended but wrongheaded policy caused untold pain, suffering, and misery, not to mention bankruptcies, foreclosures, suicides, and premature deaths. It also wiped out a crucial block of irreplaceable time for in-person instruction for tens of millions of American kids, the full ramifications of which we’ll not sustain for about a decade.
Trump has disqualified himself from ever being elected president again simply by virtue of that single, solitary decision while in office. And this I believe in the marrow of my bones.
Sho' thing Mr. Biden!
You left out that part about Fauci and ms head scarf cohort scaring everyone with dire predictions,
You also forgot to mention $2.00 gas and no wars, China backing off and a few other details insignificant to you, but not to most of us.
All of that makes your article or post BS....worthless to any thinking person.
Cool story-
The governors were behind the shutdowns and not all of them shut down.
Getting basic material and well known facts wrong doesn’t do much for the author’s integrity.
One thing missing-upon re-opening to this day-the right to work states fared much better economically.
Even Florida beset by docked cruise ships and stunted tourism had/has lower unemployment than most.
Red State...several years ago, actually changed their name to RINO State.
Known as Red Stink. Communists.
RedStink also works
If Red Stink really believed such a decision disqualifies a president, then they should also expect Biden to step down. First, though, they communists at Red Stink should read the US Constitution and not believe everything they think.
And ic he hadn’t and millions died then he would be lambasted for that
We demand presidents be perfect. And then wonder why they aren’t
Does anybody honestly think had his attorneys seen it, they’d have said, “Yes, Mr. President, we think that’s a really swell post; put that jazz up ASAP”?
That’s kind of the point Doea anyone think the leading Republican candidate, previous President should have to vet his communications to his constituents to make sure it will be OK with a DC Judge and a hack Biden special counsel. Does that sound like a free and fair election to you?
I don’t think that one thing disqualifies him, but it’s the multitude of things along with it that does.
While governors started opening up, Trump insisted he had the power to keep the states closed down.
He makes poor choices in choosing appointments. How will that change the second time around?
He spent trillions unnecessarily.
He signed an Act that allowed early voting, then told his followers not to vote early.
His ego has gotten out of control, and his Truth Social posts sound kind of crazy.
Some of his legal troubles are of his own making, and his past dishonesty and foolishness makes it difficult to think he has integrity now.
I wouldn’t agree that Trump is “disqualified”. He did a lot of very good work, and then made a very bad mistake.
Elections are usually decided on a “least of evils” basis, and Trump is still greatly preferable to Biden.
I do not at all think that Trump is the best the Republican party can offer and I hope he isn’t nominated again.
But, it’s in the marrow of her boner.
Seriously? His own making? Yep, he was a Russian spy.....
His past dishonesty? Yep, he never owned up to having two scoops of ice cream.....
Lack of integrity? Yep, he didn't start any wars and fought human trafficking. What a horrible man.
Be gone troll.
The study estimating 2.2 million deaths in the US was bogus and known early on. However, it didn’t stop anyone from using it.
Recycling debunked talking points, never mind some of those being the opposite of reality, won’t suddenly make them credible.
Without definition those words can be interpreted a number of ways? A sinister mind will see it as a threat! A normal mind sees it as queue confusion....
Can somebody tell me what the editor thought this was supposed to mean?
Pound sand, democrat shills!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.