Posted on 07/16/2023 9:46:41 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
John Kirby appears on Fox News Sunday 7-16-23. (Credit: Fox News)
The entire world knows that the United States is low on firepower because President Joe Biden acted on his inexplicable desire to blurt out such information on CNN, telling Fareed Zakaria, “This is a war relating to munitions. And [Ukraine]… is running out of that ammunition, and we’re low on it.”
He also maintained that the shortage was one reason behind the controversial decision to send cluster munitions to Ukraine.
Now the U.S. is scrambling to strengthen stockpiles, according to John Kirby, coordinator for strategic communications at the National Security Council. (By the way, what does that title even mean?)
Appearing with Shannon Bream on “Fox News Sunday,” Kirby described the effort:
We’re working very closely with the defense industry to try to ramp up production, particularly for artillery shells…
You saw that we gave some cluster munitions to Ukraine as a bridging solution here while we ramp up production. We’re having very, very strong conversations with the defense industry and we believe that we’ll be able to get there.
Watch:
WATCH: Part one of our exclusive interview with NSC Communications Coordinator John Kirby on President Biden’s NATO summit and concerns about ammunition shortages. Tune in! pic.twitter.com/lRRHFVpQGM
— Fox News Sunday (@FoxNewsSunday) July 16, 2023
Bream had brought up a think tank report that estimated it could take years to get back to where we were:
Kirby was responding to a segment reporting that a Center for Strategic and International Studies report found replacing inventories for ammunitions such as 155 mm shells could take between four and seven years. Replacing Javelins could take up to eight years and Stingers up to as many as 18 years, according to the report.
Meanwhile, he has to convince the manufacturers that the administration is in it for the long haul, saying:
The defense industry obviously wants to make sure that if they’re going to increase production, that production rate is going to stay elevated for a period of time. Because that means hiring more workers, it means retooling and adding capacity in their factories and manufacturing capabilities.
So we understand that and that’s sort of the central thesis here of the discussions that we’re having with them, is to get them to increase production and let them know that we’re serious about doing that for some period of time.
Kirby also became the latest in a long list of Biden officials offering weak answers about the Secret Service investigation into the cocaine found at the White House, saying investigators “did the best they could” even though they solved nothing. It sounds like he’s talking about little kids who lost a softball game, not about security in what is supposed to be one of the most secure buildings in the world.
Top Biden spokesman John Kirby shrugs off the cocaine scandal inside the Biden White House:
“I can’t really speak to the investigation that was done by the Secret Service … they just were not able to come up with any forensic evidence that proves it” pic.twitter.com/GPlAYv1NRE
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 16, 2023
Well, again, I can’t really speak to the investigation that was done by the Secret Service. They did the best they could to to track down how it got there, and who it might have belonged to. And they just were not able to come up with any forensic evidence that – that proves it.
But, of course, look, we take this seriously. It’s not the kind of thing we want to see happen. Now, it did happen in a visitor’s lobby area out just outside the main West Wing. So it was a highly trafficked area. We’re going to take a look at how that happened.
And obviously, if there’s things we can do to prevent that in the future, we certainly will do that. Nobody’s happy about this.
It’s embarrassing that our National Security Council spokesman even has to answer questions like these, but that’s what the Biden White House has brought on us. Whose cocaine is in the People’s House? I mean, come on. And talking about our military vulnerabilities on national television because the president couldn’t keep his lips sealed?
It’s humiliating.
Maybe we can get back all that ammo we sent to the IRS and SocSec.
Except for cluster bombs to blow up kids 💣
Plenty of those available
The Biden economy is booming.
I pointed out several times in the past, the fact that our weapon and ammo supplies were being depleted in order to supply Ukraine, and the war mongers assured me that Ukraine was getting old stuff that had been stockpiled. I argued that even those stock-piled weapons and ammo could come in handy if a time came that we needed them, since it would take a while to get production of new stuff back online. Biden appears to have confirmed my concerns.
The US isn’t short of that sort of ammo.
155mm artillery isn’t usually supplied to the IRS. I haven’t heard of them packing cannons with 30 mile range.
They are getting old stuff that’s been stockpiled. Some of it. They have been getting new or new-ish stuff too.
The critical issue is really about just a few items. 155mm HE artillery shells, and to a lesser degree GMLRS (GPS guided rockets). Less of an issue are Stinger manpads and Javelin atgms. All but the GMLRS are substitutable with foreign sources or equivalents.
We the people, OTOH.......
You have to consider what potential enemies you have. Keeping stockpiles is costly in all sorts of ways. They are a maintenance burden and they age out. Ammo, even artillery shells, has a shelf life. Technology has a shelf life. Maybe even your 5,000 tanks will be useless against a peer opponent in half a decade.
So, think, who is likely to be a big enough enemy in 5, 10, 15, 20 years, to justify a massive mobilisation requiring a turning out of masses of surplus equipment? You have to play scenarios.
BTW there is a wonderful place in Austria, where the Habsburgs put away an armies’ worth of 16th-17th century armaments and armor. They kept their stockpile so long it turned into art.
The US does not have a likely continental enemy in sight, save Russia. All that stockpiled stuff was intended for Russia, or the Soviet Union. So its going where it was (mostly) designed to go.
The US never intended to fight a ground war as they are doing it in Ukraine.
Artillery in US doctrine is not meant to fire bombardments for months on end. The US doctrine is offensive, and heavily dependent on airpower. A short, sharp breakthrough operation, followed by maneuver into the enemy flanks and rear.
Think Desert Storm, not Bakhmut.
Neither the Russians nor the Ukrainians have the means to do Desert Storm, for different reasons. So both are reduced to misusing artillery.
You won’t know until it hits you.
[Top Biden spokesman John Kirby shrugs off the cocaine scandal inside the Biden White House:]
John Kirby is a terrible liar. I worked around a bunch of them when I was Big 6. Every time I see him on TV he’s prevaricating.
US doctrine is offensive, and heavily dependent on airpower.
IF Russian air defence can limit US Air power, the USA is truly f#cked.
There is no plan B.
The Russians have been planning for air defence against US jets for 70 years.
Now, USA aircraft are so superior the Russians will just get mowed down.... blah, blah, blah
(that’s what we heard about the Leopards and Bradleys, turns out they are such crap that the Ukranians are now on foot like WW1)
No air superiority, the US gets on the ground with these guys and get blasted by 20K artillery shells per day, while diversity hire Austin tries to figure out how to buy forging presses.
Keeping stockpiles is costly in all sorts of ways. They are a maintenance burden and they age out. Ammo, even artillery shells, has a shelf life.
They don’t need stockpiles. they need mothballed production capability.
They need approx six long stroke forging presses of one thousand tons at $50 million each.
That’s $300 million one time investment, in a bloated budget of 900 BILLION PER YEAR !
Each press can produce 1000 shells per day
The machining of the shells can use commercial lathes and cnc machines which are readily available.
These ass clowns have had their head up their butts for more than a year on this.
They cannot figure out what they need, and they can’t pull the trigger on $300 million which is 0.03 percent of one years budget !
For liberals, competency is a non-issue. They are there just to get rich. If everybody dies in the process, they don’t care.
The US is buying oil from Venezuela..so maybe the Norks have a few pallet loads of 155 munitions they would like to trade.
The USAF has been working on SEAD for the same 70 years, with vastly more resources to throw at the problem. I’d bet on the US achieving air supremacy.
And it’s not just the planes. This is a complex array of systems including both defensive and offensive weapons, plus intel of many kinds.
The US has been buying oil from Venezuela for most of a century. The US has specially configured refineries to deal with Venezuelan heavy crude.
Well, when you’re right, you’re right. They should spring for this investment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.