Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Presidents Can Decide What Documents Are Personal And Which Are Presidential. This Was Decided By An OBAMA Judge Ruling On Bill Clinton
https://twitter.com/JesseBWatters/status/1667323188722962433 ^ | 06/09/23 | Jesse Watters

Posted on 06/09/2023 6:59:15 PM PDT by Enlightened1

Joe Biden is having Donald Trump ARRESTED! But, EVERYONE has the law wrong! Former Presidents can decide what documents are personal and which are presidential. This was decided by a OBAMA Judge ruling. and it all started with Bill Clinton.

 

(More In Video Link Below)

https://twitter.com/JesseBWatters/status/1667323188722962433


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics
KEYWORDS: classified; classifieddocs; clinton; clintonsockdrawer; declassification; documents; donatedonaldtrump; donatetrump; obama; presidentialrecords; sandyberger; sandyburglersock; trump

1 posted on 06/09/2023 6:59:15 PM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Completely different situation. Obama was a Democrat.


2 posted on 06/09/2023 7:03:04 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Are the lawyers going to keep trying to shove this “case law” precedent in our faces, or is there going to be a reasoned and consistent interpretation of the law that makes sense to the non-lawyers out here that make up jury pools?

A law too arcane or complex to be explained to the general public is no law at all, but a planned trap for the unwary.


3 posted on 06/09/2023 7:07:55 PM PDT by alloysteel (Fiction has to be at least plausible, while reality obeys no such constraint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

I think it comes down to which side can shout the loudest, which in practice means which side has the MSM on its side.


4 posted on 06/09/2023 7:09:11 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Completely different situation. Obama was a Democrat.

. . . But they'd still lose the case in the Supremes. They're pursuing it anyway, though. That tells us the point isn't to convict Trump of anything, but to preoccupy the political conversation with this until they can come up with a different distraction, instead of Trump's campaign--or with Biden's difficulty in finding his pants.

5 posted on 06/09/2023 7:12:14 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

So Dems say Trump committed crimes.

So why then do they support Biden given he took classified documents while a senator, not even president, and he took them while VP?

According to what they believe they can’t support either then.

So if Dems go by “No one is above the law”, and they really believe Trump broke the law, then they would have to support RFK Jr, or Marrianne Williamson in the primaries.


6 posted on 06/09/2023 7:12:20 PM PDT by Its All Over Except ...
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot

Absolutely.

And if they get close to getting Biden, I’ll tell you exactly what he’ll do: he’ll go completely senile, develop a full-blown case of Alzheimer’s.

A lot of Catholic priests went that route when they couldn’t wriggle out of the evidence and testimony against them in the child abuse cases. Biden will do it too.


7 posted on 06/09/2023 7:15:09 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Exactly. It’s not valid in this case, because Orange Man Bad.


8 posted on 06/09/2023 7:57:14 PM PDT by M1903A1 ("We shed all that is good and virtuous for that which is shoddy and sleazy...and call it progress" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

If Biden is having DJT arrested, then why didn’t Trump have Hillary & Hunter arrested?


9 posted on 06/09/2023 8:51:54 PM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

All Biden has to do to claim Alzheimer’s as a defense is to simply point to the latest claim from right wing media.


10 posted on 06/09/2023 8:53:53 PM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Not like he’s that far off now.


11 posted on 06/09/2023 9:36:56 PM PDT by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

The ruling is NOT precedent. Rulings of District Courts are not binding on other District Courts. Only rulings of the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and SCOTUS have precedential authority over the District Court for the Southern District of Florida, though rulings of other circuit courts could be “persuasive authority.”


12 posted on 06/09/2023 9:59:12 PM PDT by j.havenfarm (22 years on Free Republic, 12/10/22! more then 6500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

It’s (D)ifferent.


13 posted on 06/09/2023 10:15:34 PM PDT by FrankRizzo890
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson