Completely different situation. Obama was a Democrat.
Are the lawyers going to keep trying to shove this “case law” precedent in our faces, or is there going to be a reasoned and consistent interpretation of the law that makes sense to the non-lawyers out here that make up jury pools?
A law too arcane or complex to be explained to the general public is no law at all, but a planned trap for the unwary.
. . . But they'd still lose the case in the Supremes. They're pursuing it anyway, though. That tells us the point isn't to convict Trump of anything, but to preoccupy the political conversation with this until they can come up with a different distraction, instead of Trump's campaign--or with Biden's difficulty in finding his pants.
Exactly. It’s not valid in this case, because Orange Man Bad.