Posted on 05/13/2023 1:10:41 PM PDT by Jacquerie
From the moment of our independence, the first question as posited by Mercy Warren was “what government consistent with the Declaration of Independence can be designed by men too proud for monarchy, too poor for nobility, and it is to be feared, too selfish and avaricious for a virtuous republic?”
Republicanism was in our blood. Despite the efforts of the British Crown all of the states had evolved from quasi-republican colonies. There was no other choice. The challenge was how to secure republican liberty in a society composed of normal, often selfish people.
For Mercy Warren, the answer was found entirely in religion and virtue. To throw the checks of conscience aside, to let avarice and ambition rule, was to doom America to degeneracy and certain failure.
A decade later, the Framers refused to give up on republican government. Being practical and political men, many of whom served in the confederation congress, they rejected Mercy Warren’s reliance on religion and virtue, the “weaker springs of the human character.” In fits and starts and close calls during the summer of 1787 they developed and relied on the structure of their design to channel and direct ambition and avarice so that they would serve rather than destroy free government.
In addition to a horizontal division of power between the three fundamental functions of any government, the Framers’ keystone was the vertical separation of power in which national authority, sparingly doled out in enumerated powers, with the remainder left among the states, was enforced by a senate of the states. They did not rely on what James Madison termed “parchment barriers” alone, such as a Bill of Rights to secure liberty. With power so well divided, so chopped up as never before, they justifiably trusted the natural inclination of men to pursue their interests would prevent the accumulation of tyrannical power. Enforcement of what was to become the 10th Amendment wouldn’t rely on the goodwill of self-interested and popularly derived politicians, nor Scotus. Security of state powers relied on the states themselves.
The Framers’ reliance on federalism, of state participation in government, can be seen in the manner the constitution was ratified, in the Article V process, the electoral college and especially the senate, whose members were appointed by and responsible to state legislatures.
Central to understanding why the 17th Amendment must be repealed is recognition that the extensive powers granted to the new government were designed with the assumption that the states would forever participate in it, that no less than thirteen distinct republican legislatures would continually cast watchful eyes over every proceeding of congress, the president and courts. It is why the states agreed to relinquish specific powers in Article I and submit to the Constitution and its pursuant laws as supreme law of the land.
From this gift to mankind in a new system of confederal republican government, one that relied on both the consent of the people and distinct member republics, liberty could prosper.
History, both ancient and our own since 1913 illustrate the instability of democratic republics. Our 103-year experiment in representative democracy is a failure. For practical purposes, Article I § 1, which established the American Republic has been repealed. Legislative power is in the hands of the executive and scotus. Unless this concentration of power is reversed, we are doomed to accelerating anarchy, then by calls for a strongman to “do something,” followed by bare-knuckled tyrannical force.
To restore the republican freedom we long had under a federal Constitution, the 17th Amendment must go. And since reform will not emerge from those who profit so well from our corrupt system, there is no alternative to an Article V state amendment convention.
Restore the Constitution!Size DC!
Close entire Rogue/Un-Constitutional Departments, including their SWAT Teams.
Article V ping!
... but, but, but ...
“We The People” are afraid to try to fix it,
because we might make it worse!
Too late.
We need a new government.
Thanks for not comprehending my post. It is obviously above your intellect.
Eliminate all laws in 5 years. We’ll have 5 years to start over.
I understand you recommend a convention of the states to bring back the law of the land.
re: 6
What I said was waiting for and relying on the current system to initiate the process will not get results. But we don’t have to wait on others to bring the 1787 Federal Constitution back for us. It can be started TODAY on an individual basis at the site I linked.
Is it really necessary to be hostile and insulting?
The progressives intend to destroy it and make restoring it impossible.
After some fifteen years of posts in favor of the Framers’ Article V, not a single Freeper ever argued against their particulars for a Convention of the States.
Fifteen years? Hmmm...
I remember when Mark Levin began talking about the constitutional convention on his show about that long ago and I supported it at the time as well as the War on Terror.
I can personally report that after a couple of meetings and 30 minutes signing documents that I am lawfully an American State National standing on the land and soil jurisdiction of the Federal Constitution and not subject to territorial or municipal statutes, rules, regulations or otherwise “acts of pretended legislation.” It didn’t take 15 years.
Well, maybe we shouldn't give up so easy... Maybe we can convince Elon Musk to buy back enough of those senators from Soros so we can have at least a fighting chance at having a functioning government....maybe.
If not, then it's my opinion that the best way to get things back on the right road is the repeal of the 17th.. It's not the only way, but it is far less gory then the other..
I’m amazed the remains of the Framers’ republic lasted 110 years since the 17th Amendment.
All good things are possible upon repeal of the 17th and impossible without.
I’d love to believe that something like this is legit.
I found a video of 2 women who don’t appear to be associated with the site I have linked in my tag line but they go over the 14th amendment which is a perfect place to start verifying legitimacy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12CQLegA6AE
Here’s a link to an article which covers the same thing.
https://states.americanstatenationals.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/AnnasReformatofGeoffreysTimeLineResearch.pdf
The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for among old parchments or musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself, and can never be erased. Alexander Hamilton 1775
Congress has had the power to propose amendments the entire time. Notice how most of the stuff they passed has the pharse ‘Congress shall have the power...’ written into it? About time the states responded with ‘Congress shall no longer have the power....’.
Yep, Congress will never reform itself. That is up to the Sovereign People via their states.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.