Posted on 04/28/2023 7:51:46 AM PDT by Red Badger
In a remarkable video, ABC News presented a pre-recorded interview with presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, telling viewers that parts of what was said had been edited out because he said something about the COVID vaccine that the news network disagrees with.
The interview was aired with clear edits made during parts where Kennedy spoke about his views on vaccines.
The interviewer Linsey Davis asked RFK Jr. about his belief that vaccination was linked to autism, which he began to explain before she jumped in and claimed that has all been debunked. The footage then skipped to a different topic entirely.
After the interview concluded, Davis told viewers “We should note that during our conversation, Kennedy made false claims about the Covid-19 vaccines.”
She claimed “Data shows that the Covid-19 vaccine has prevented millions of hospitalizations and deaths from the disease.”
“He also made misleading claims about the relationship between vaccination and autism,” Davis further asserted, adding “Research shows that vaccines and the ingredients used in the vaccines do not cause autism, including multiple studies involving more than a million children and major medical associations like the American Academy of Pediatrics and the advocacy group Autism Speaks.”
“We’ve used our editorial judgment in not including extended portions of that exchange in our interview,” Davis explained.
Remarkable.
VIDEO AT LINK.............
What did Kennedy say? That the COVID vaccines don’t prevent transmission of the virus, despite government claims to the contrary? That the vaccines have caused deaths? We simply don’t know because ABC News declared itself to be the arbiter of information and openly censored him.
Here is the full interview (minus the parts you’re not allowed to hear):
Not to be haughty but News orgs that declare themselves as arbiters of truth are in fact nothing more than arbiters of propaganda and lies.
ARBEITERS..... of propaganda and lies........................
What’s worse: ABC doesn’t care.
Who needs consumers?
If Deep State sees the need for an enemedia, it’ll keep it afloat with our tax dollars.
Sound familiar...?
The Medical Industrial Complex including Big Pharma must be protected.
So what is their explanation for the national explosion in autism in the past 40 years from something virtually unknown when I was a kid? I’m not saying it was vaccines, but since NO ONE KNOWS, shouldn’t we hear ALL opinions?
Keep believing that.
**********
Why do you care about democrat primary candidates?
Are you a Biden Republican?
Personally, if I were RFK jr, I’d offer Williamson a debate, hosted on Rumble or something, and then get a cardboard cutout for the big guy. The cutout would probably be more coherent.
Alternately, get someone who looks enough alike, and every time “Biden” gets a response, have your lookalike spew gobbledygook. Trooanomashabadapressure!
In either scenario, make it clear that the President refused to participate in the democratic process, and thus you got a qualified substitute.
If someone making a claim that they believe is false during an interview, should be none of their g** d*** business.
Sadly, I’ve seen Fox doing the same thing. Cut away from a story because they didn’t know if the things being said were true or not.
How can people in major industries be so completely ignorant of their responsibilities?
I’d do the same, lol
The only loons are the indoctrinated morons who fell for the covid scam.
It's hard to keep track of all the "isms"... I think we're closer to Fascism now than anything else. Socialist Fascism.
Our government controls ALL... with a facade of freedom.
NO ONE really calls me "Tim". It's just a Monty Python reference. People who love Python are "automatic friends" to me. :-)
Sorry I missed the Python reference, I never got the humor so I’m not very familiar....went over my head no doubt, as anything north of a fart joke usually escapes me. 😏
I care only in the sense of whoever democrats nominate end up with the office. Foolish otherwise?
I care only in the sense of whoever democrats nominate end up with the office. Foolish otherwise?
********
That will be Biden because no incumbent has lost a primary from either party. Whether Biden wins the General Election is another matter.
I don’t know much about the democrats, I’ve never been one, voted for one, or even been intrigued by any of their candidates.(Been voting since 1989)
I do find Biden Republicans a fascinating species, a species worth studying.
Lastly, I apologize for my question of: Are you a Biden Republican?
I jumped the shark and it was an unnecessary question.
My comment earlier was missing a word. It should have said I care only in the sense of whoever democrats nominate might end up with the office.
They do this with a democrat named Kennedy.
Imagine the censoring and the continued outright lying they will do with Donald Trump!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.