Posted on 04/28/2023 7:51:46 AM PDT by Red Badger
In a remarkable video, ABC News presented a pre-recorded interview with presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, telling viewers that parts of what was said had been edited out because he said something about the COVID vaccine that the news network disagrees with.
The interview was aired with clear edits made during parts where Kennedy spoke about his views on vaccines.
The interviewer Linsey Davis asked RFK Jr. about his belief that vaccination was linked to autism, which he began to explain before she jumped in and claimed that has all been debunked. The footage then skipped to a different topic entirely.
After the interview concluded, Davis told viewers “We should note that during our conversation, Kennedy made false claims about the Covid-19 vaccines.”
She claimed “Data shows that the Covid-19 vaccine has prevented millions of hospitalizations and deaths from the disease.”
“He also made misleading claims about the relationship between vaccination and autism,” Davis further asserted, adding “Research shows that vaccines and the ingredients used in the vaccines do not cause autism, including multiple studies involving more than a million children and major medical associations like the American Academy of Pediatrics and the advocacy group Autism Speaks.”
“We’ve used our editorial judgment in not including extended portions of that exchange in our interview,” Davis explained.
Remarkable.
VIDEO AT LINK.............
What did Kennedy say? That the COVID vaccines don’t prevent transmission of the virus, despite government claims to the contrary? That the vaccines have caused deaths? We simply don’t know because ABC News declared itself to be the arbiter of information and openly censored him.
Here is the full interview (minus the parts you’re not allowed to hear):
Going to be hard for the big guy to avoid debates if RFK is polling this high.
We have passed socialism and are now closer to communism than most people realize or want to know.
By the time the light bulb goes on it’ll be too late......and probably already is.
BTW........some call me Tim also. A noble name if there ever was one. 😏
“Going to be hard for the big guy to avoid debates if RFK is polling this high”
I heard that decision has already been made. The dnc says no primary debates.
Uh, it appears the false claim was that it worked. NOT!
🔬😲🤔🚫😷💉🐎💩
Like the ‘false’ claims that the virus came from a Chinese lab? Oops! Now... It it apparently did originate from a Chinese lab... The next ‘falsehood’ to be revealed as truth... The vaccines didn’t do a thing to fight Covid... A placebo would’ve worked just as well.
All your news will be edited, and you will be happy about it.
-PJ
Already taken care of......No democrat primary debates
https://www.foxnews.com/media/democrats-rip-dnc-not-holding-2024-primary-debates-robs-voters.amp
What will ABC News do if RFK, Jr. says something about COVID during a debate?
-PJ
**********
I think people are forgetting that incumbent Presidents don’t debate challengers in the primary.
Trump didn’t in 2020 and Biden won’t in 2024.
-PJ
They made a determination to willfully publish deliberate false information about Mr Kennedy, slandering and libeling him in the process. Sounds like a BILLION DOLLAR DEFAMATION LAWSUIT.
-- Matt Taibbi, The Press is Now Also the Police
This is why companies always call a perpetrator the ALLEGEDED person.
way more likely, he’s correct and YOU’RE the loon
Considering that drug companies now cover 70% of sponsorship of network news, I think one can safely say that the First Amendment is dead.
Who the hell does ABC think it is to be determining what is true and what is not. It’s job is to put out information/facts and let the people decide what is and isn’t true. But we all know that ABC and the rest of the “main stream media” have long ago stopped just providing facts and started presenting democrat propaganda.
I've censored ABC for lying about everything.
Their network. Their prerogative.
Keep believing that.
I think that they already showed that the covid vaccines did keep you from getting the original strain of covid-19 for about 3-4 months. However, after 200 days they lost their effectiveness. After six months they didn’t do DIDDLY(technical term for crapola). Therefore, after six months you needed a BOOSTER.
The real issue was there any real need for a vaccine at all for any one under the age of 70? Meaning, did the RISKS of unknown side effects(due to the lack of long term testing) outweigh the potentially benefit.
We don’t really know how many people actually died of covid-19. We know that virtually anyone under the age of 40 should not have been vaccinated. That it should have been a crime to vaccinate children.
We also now know the only people that were in real danger were the OBESE and immune compromised old people.
Personally, I am just glad my wife, daughter, in laws, and myself did not get vaccinated. However, my 25 year old son did. He took the J&J shot to be employed. So, we still worry about him. My only son.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.