Posted on 02/23/2023 8:36:51 AM PST by PJ-Comix
The new CORRUPT Project Veritas might think they can post videos while escaping the wrath of James O'Keefe supporters. The problem with that is that their first video posted after they got rid of the Project Veritas founder revealed a solid wall of ANGER towards both the corrupt Project Veritas and their board. As you can see, 100% of the comments posted below the video were completely NEGATIVE. If the new Project Veritas thinks they can post more videos without blowback, the HUMILIATION they got on their last video shows just how sadly delusional they are.
Gee that guy looks just like my uncle !
😹
The Cult Awareness Network was an anti-cult clearinghouse for information on cults and deprogramming, for parents and families of (mostly young) people who had been seduced by one of the many cults who had sprung up in the wake of the Summer of Love hippy culture.
The CAN, headquartered in New York City, had classified Scientology as a cult. When the Scientology organization learned of this, they targeted CAN as an enemy. When CAN ran into money troubles, Scientology bought them out, and then moved their own people into the telephone answering centers that CAN had set up. When parents called, their calls were taken by cheerful operators who answered with "Cult Awareness Network, how can I help you?"
But the parents were actually talking to the Church of Scientology.
James O’Keefe IS Project Veritas.
He will survive and thrive.
The company...without his vision...will fail miserably.
He can’t talk, he’s got his lips placed firmly on Zelensky’s posterior.
When you go to the video link, there’s no comments.
Um... Which link did you go to? Mine OR the actual Project Veritas video? Most likely mine because I didn't provide a link to the PV video.
I clicked on both links you provided...the one in the title, and the one showing under the photo of James O’Keefe. Both go to DUFUnnies at Rumble. You didn’t provide a link to the Project Veritas video site.
Because I figured it was so easy to just do a YouTube search for Project Veritas and then click on their latest video (whose title you can see in my video) that there was no need to.
It would have been nice if you had provided a link to the actual video and comments you took the time to make a post about.
Enter "Project Veritas" into YouTube search. When you see the channel come up, click on it. Then select their most recent video. Easy Peasy.
Enter "Project Veritas" into YouTube search. When you see the channel come up, click on it. Then select their most recent video. Easy Peasy.
You could have saved yourself a lot of writing, and explaining, if you'd just added the link address in your initial post, or explained to people that the links you provided, wouldn't get them to the Project Veritas video page you were posting about.
Was that a Mitsubishi cars commercial?
That’s Joe Isuzu!
You must not have been around for the ‘80s.
I think all the videos which reference other videos should have links to the originals in the information area. (I am surprised that this is neither an actual nor informal rule already. No credit to those others?)
I looked for the original video as you suggested, and by going to the PV playlist... nope, nada, can’t find it.
However, I did note that PV videos on completely unrelated topics have a lot of comments similar to those under the video you referenced, also 100% negative.
Interaction is the currency of social media. They don’t care if it is positive or negative.
I unsubscribed from PV and won’t give them any further interactions. That is how to make their profile go down.
Twitter video: Whistleblowers supporting James O’Keefe:
https://twitter.com/Perpetualmaniac/status/1629090011437047814
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.