Carlson: Source says, “Yes,” CIA Involved in Assassination of President Kennedy – Video

Freely Informed ^ | December 17, 2022 | FreelyInformed

[dragnet2]

In the JFK case, distrust is sowed through redaction and suppression of 60 year old documents.

Not to mention what we now know this same government not too many decades later, attempted to criminally undermine, compromise and overthrow a legitimately elected President of the United States.

[Jimmy Valentine]

I remember that after the Bay of Pigs fiasco, Kennedy blamed the CIA and publicly said that he was going to tear it to pieces. They had some pretty tough hombres then so maybe.

[GraceG]

[Uncle Miltie]

larrytown

Since Mar 16, 2020

[dragnet2]

Trump is probably the one who told him this. He had the keys to the big filing cabinet, all the intel etc.

[laconic]

try whowhatwhy.org. They reprinted the Barbara Bush letter she wrote on Nov. 22 and in a multi-part series, describe her husband’s ongoing ties to the CIA. Unless they made up the documentation, the entire situation is extremely odd.

[Salvavida]

Untrue. There is no such tendency unless you speak of the executive leadership of such agencies: then they appoint/promote disciples to do their bidding. I have never detected a condescending attitude in 35 years in intel. Corruption stemming from greed and choice positions, yes; but never a spirit of animosity towards Americans.

[cpdiii]

“I was a kid at the time and I can tell you exactly what happened that day from my viewpoint back then and so can every other sentient American.”

Yep, I was walking down the hall in high school. A classmate told me, “the president has been shot.” I remember it precisely.

[matthew fuller]

https://bookshop.org/p/books/on-the-trail-of-the-assassins-one-man-s-quest-to-solve-the-murder-of-president-kennedy-jim-garrison/7180302?ean=9781620872994

I read this book several years ago. Seems like it was/is pretty accurate.

[dragnet2]

If there is something concrete demonstrating that he had CIA connections way back then, by all means enlighten me with a link to it.

That's a bit hard to do when the corrupt running this government refuse to release *all* the pertinent documents after many decades. Who are they protecting?

[LS]

Just to clarify, the source did NOT say that. He said “I BELIEVE the CIA was involved.”

Well, I believe I’m going to win a Pulitzer.

He didn’t really have clear evidence.

[atc23]

I remember being quite disappointed that Felix the Cat was not on that day when I ran home from school in the aftermath of the shooting.

Anyone who’s studied the assassination most of their lives like me has to be convinced that the FBI, CIA and the Mob / Deep State were balls deep in JFK’s killing.

[boxlunch]

Is that tongue in cheek? Sarcasm? A joke?

Just wondering if you are serious...

[lasereye]

Where does the claim that Bush had CIA connections back then come from in the first place?

[boxlunch]

Exactly! Saying stuff is redacted to “protect national security?” Huh? 60 years later, who is even still alive that could possible have been involved, or if alive a doddering elderly person with no power or control. So why would they redact or keep anything from being released after all this time?

Something very very dirty is still being hidden. There is absolutely no other reason to keep any part of it hidden.

National security? They mean security and power of CIA could be compromised

[boxlunch]

unless you speak of the executive leadership of such agencies: then they appoint/promote disciples to do their bidding.

You just contradicted yourself and admitted the exec leadership promotes "disciples" to "do their bidding". What could be more dangerous and self serving than executive leadership appointing and promoting people to do their bidding, with agencies that have the near unlimited power of intelligence agencies???

[dragnet2]

That was a question, see the question mark?

[cpdiii]

Exactly! Saying stuff is redacted to “protect national security?” Huh? 60 years later, who is even still alive that could possible have been involved, or if alive a doddering elderly person with no power or control. So why would they redact or keep anything from being released after all this time? Something very very dirty is still being hidden. There is absolutely no other reason to keep any part of it hidden. National security? They mean security and power of CIA could be compromised

You are correct. Most of the bad actors if not all from the assassination are dead thus keeping these papers hidden has no purpose except if it did show the CIA or FBI was involved a public outcry would occur to bring into check and or tear down our present CIA and FBI. They are today protecting their illicit and dangerous power.

The CIA has killed in the past to affect political changes in foreign nations. Perhaps also here in the United States also?

[Salvavida]

I didn’t contradict myself at all. You said intelligence folks have a tendency to be antagonistic towards Americans. That is a very broad brush you used to paint everyone. The small percentage of execs are the ones screwing it up.

[lasereye]

I said the claim that Bush had CIA connections back then is made out of thin air. You responded “If you believe that you’ll believe anything”. I then asked for concrete evidence of Bush’s CIA connections. You respond by asking a general question “who are they protecting”?

The fact that they haven’t released all info from the assassination is not evidence that Bush had CIA connections - unless you’re employing circular reasoning, which I think you may be doing. It doesn’t even suggest it’s true.

If you say it suggests they may be protecting SOMEBODY I could agree. But there’s no way to get Bush out of that fact, outside of circular reasoning. How did Bush become the focus of this? It makes no sense.

I repeat, the claim that Bush had CIA connections back then is made out of thin air.