Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beautiful Young Queen Elisabeth - What She Stood For - And How Those Ideals Have Been Trashed
https://freedom-demokrasi-and-civilised-humanity.com/ ^ | 14th December, 2022 | Ozguy1945

Posted on 12/13/2022 10:47:21 PM PST by Ozguy1945

Queen Elisabeth was a beautiful woman.

She was the world's last head of state to serve in the armed services in World War Two.

She stood for high ideals.

But the PC trashing of Western Societies goes on now at the hands of leftist government criminals who have no shame. They trash anything good she stood for.

God Bless Freedom.

God Save The West.

Please pray with me for us all.


TOPICS: Government; History; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: blogpimp; itselizabeth; learnhowtopost; learnhowtospell; learnwhatfreedomis; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 12/13/2022 10:47:21 PM PST by Ozguy1945
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945
Mate, my Mother very much looked like QEII.   She kept a special smile for whenever the comparison came up.
2 posted on 12/13/2022 10:54:13 PM PST by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

Aw come on, The British Royal Family was the epicenter of today’s culture of death. Her husband spoke publicly about wanting to come back to life as a virus and kill 80% of humanity.


3 posted on 12/14/2022 12:29:36 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

And she could shoot a weapon in defense of her country. A lady who represented Britain in its finest hour. RIP. A great lady down. IMO.


4 posted on 12/14/2022 12:55:30 AM PST by Equine1952
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

The British Royal Family is hardly perfect, but epicentre is a bit much, and many of the family’s flaws are noted in the link.

I’d pin more blame on the Kennedy’s and the Rockefeller’s, at least for the states, than on the Royal Family generally, and as the link shows, the Queen herself was a good egg.


5 posted on 12/14/2022 1:07:03 AM PST by Hieronymus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

She still gave royal assent to the 1967 Abortion Act and 2013 Marriage (Same-Sex Couples) Act. It’s been argued that actually using her reserve power of refusing assent would somehow have created a constitutional crisis, but it should have been put to the test because a constitutional government without veto power is an actual tyranny.


6 posted on 12/14/2022 1:29:08 AM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus

FFS, I’m not talking about Diana or Megxit. I’m talking about developing plans for the extermination of the human race. To be fair, most of the Royal Family’s evil predates Elizabeth II: the division of Africa and the Middle East into deliberately weak, unstable territories having no language or ethnic commonalities... the abandonment (sold as liberation) of the Africa and Asia to collapse into crackpot dictatorships after a century of deliberately interfering with modernization (Read about India’s Hedge if you want to learn about the true face of Satan himself)... pussyfooting with China after two centuries of turning the nation paranoid of the West... the endless war on religion.

Take every conspiracy you’ve ever heard about the Rothschilds, and simply understand the Rothschilds as a stand-in for the British Royal Family from a society that apes American freedom but actually has always had government-controlled media. The Rothschilds ensured British access to capital during the Napoleonic wars and WWI. Why do you think blaming everything on the Rothschilds was never associated with Hitler and his Jewish Banker rants? Because the Rothschilds conspiracies were always simply about discussing the British royal family but blaming someone else.


7 posted on 12/14/2022 1:39:28 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dangus

I spent a week or two thinking about conspiracies at 21. Haven’t given them much thought since.

That doesn’t mean that I don’t believe that there are people pulling strings in back rooms, but untless I happend to be in the room or can get in the room, not my problem.

I don’t think the British Royal Family has any real pull outside of Britain, and not a great deal inside.


8 posted on 12/14/2022 1:56:07 AM PST by Hieronymus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Oh, it’s worse than giving royal assent! The royal family agitated for population control.

“One must remember that resources are finite and cannot accommodate indefinite population growth. Families must plan their families just as the Government has to plan the Nation’s development. There can be no long-term stability when the rate of population growth exceeds the rate of job creation.”

Also her (although citing her husband): ““If the world pollution situation is not critical at the moment, it is as certain as anything can be, that the situation will become increasingly intolerable within a very short time … If we fail to cope with this challenge, all the other problems will pale into insignificance.””

What she said is actually worse than the context of her husband’s comments. Her husband had been talking in 1969 about pollution in general: lead, sulfur, industrial byproducts, trash. All these problems were kicked 50 years later, when she recycled his words, but in a new context, of overpopulation and carbon emissions. Indeed, every pollutant referenced by her husband had successfully been solved. Carbon “pollution” was invented by the British royal family a decade later as an insurmountable problem (although chiefly the original demonization of carbon was motivated as much by trying to break the backs of the coal-mining strikes, achieving centralized control of all industry is an unmistakable goal).

Yet, even though a lack of industrialization led billions to seek massive families (they are typically not natural), QE2 saw industrialization as something only for England and the corporations under royal control. Instead of describing industrialization, therefore, as improving production, she chose the claptrap of Luddites:

“I have too much love for my poor people who obtain their bread by the employment of knitting to give my money to forward an invention that will tend to their ruin by depriving them of employment and thus making them beggars,”

So industrialization was fine for shipyards and Bentleys, but not India.


9 posted on 12/14/2022 2:02:50 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Equine1952
Amazing historical fact.

As a teenager she knew Winston Churchill. Later, she became his boss.

10 posted on 12/14/2022 2:18:01 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian (Proud member of the control group)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945
But the PC trashing of Western Societies goes on now at the hands of leftist government criminals who have no shame.

They have no shame?

We need to stop projecting our own values onto the Left.

Of course they have no shame. They are our enemies. They are trying to destroy Western civilization and they will eventually kill us all if we stand in their way.

Being aghast at their having no shame is like saying the Nazis should be ashamed of themselves for bombing London.

That's what happens when you wage war. You kill and destroy.

We as a culture need to get out of our childish naivete and realize...we are under attack by a very real enemy.

The enemy isn't using guns and ammo...yet. And why should it when its current strategy is working so well?

And BTW we shouldn't confuse the enemy's foot soldiers with its high command. Those who have been indoctrinated and brainwashed into serving as foot soldiers (the Woke) are not the high command. In fact, even the college professors and now K-12 educators who do the brainwashing are not the high command. And that brings us to our first big problem. Who is the high command?

As Sun Tzu said (and everyone knows), our first order of business is to define/know our enemy.

I don't think we have done that yet.

If any of you do know exactly who our enemy is, please give us your opinion.

As an aside, we all know we are fighting the Deep State, the media, academia, the Democrats, Soros, RINOs, the medical profession, etc. But who is behind this conglomeration?

11 posted on 12/14/2022 2:49:33 AM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

I can’t decide if meghan is just a nut job or is being used to take down the monarchy

If someone has been behind it they should have picked a more stable nut job. Everthing markle touches turns to crap.

That Ngozi chick ..who defended markle...seems to have been running a charity scam that got exposed when she screamed racism against Lady hussey.


12 posted on 12/14/2022 2:59:11 AM PST by RummyChick ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945
I'd prefer a few more Queen Elizabeths, and a whole lot less of Pelosis and Maxines.

13 posted on 12/14/2022 4:07:25 AM PST by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

I,unlike some Yanks,have a good amount of respect for her. Can’t say the same for some of her relatives,however. And it must be noted that thanks largely to the European Union and Germany’s death grip upon it all of Europe is circling the bottom of the toilet bowl today. So it shouldn’t be a surprise what’s going on in Britain.


14 posted on 12/14/2022 4:21:35 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (No Doubt Now: Stolen Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
#12: "That Ngozi chick …

That Ngozi chick is yet another fake African. That Ngozi chick's real name is Marlene Headley, born in London. We have plenty of fake Africans in the USA too, "Kweisi Mfume" for example. His real name is Frizzell Gerald Gray, born in Baltimore.

A lot of Negroes don't like their real names. They don't like being called "Ruby Brown" so they make up fake African names. How many colored kids war walking around with fake names like Ja'kwana or Placenta?

15 posted on 12/14/2022 4:23:25 AM PST by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

I love the video of the speech that Churchill made before the Canadian Parliament in ‘43. “Some chicken...some neck”.


16 posted on 12/14/2022 4:23:47 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (No Doubt Now: Stolen Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“Who is behind this conglomeration?”

Could it be satan.


17 posted on 12/14/2022 4:39:36 AM PST by Iceclimber58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

She had the power to stop all this.

Yes, it would have been risky, and might have ended the monarchy.

But still, she presided over it all.


18 posted on 12/14/2022 4:46:02 AM PST by Jim Noble (I feel my heart beat faster any place in the neighborhood of the Astor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The Royal Veto has not been used since the reign of Queen Anne (The Scottish Militia Bill in 1708). It is effectively dead.

Constitutionally, the King or Queen is required to act on the advise of his or her ministers.

It is up to the voters to change the Crown’s ministers when they render bad advice.


19 posted on 12/14/2022 4:50:23 AM PST by GreenLanternCorps (Hi! I'm the Dread Pirate Roberts! (TM) Atsk about franchise opportunities in your area.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

The aristocracy didn’t survive by being virtue signalling nitwits. They did survive by being sensible when the peasants revolted over the ego-driven destructiveness thing, which as an approach will prevail over other people’s ego-driven destructiveness, since the unwashed masses want better lives with less drama and bullcrap.

The court of Hollywood has succumbed to the conmen and bullcrap, but Hollywood always was about conmen and bullcrap. The same can’t be said about the Brits.


20 posted on 12/14/2022 5:01:14 AM PST by BlackAdderess (Representatives are supposed to represent their constituents, that is their job. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson