Posted on 11/19/2022 4:46:17 PM PST by shadowlands1960
Over 15 million people voted in this poll. The final numbers were:
Yes 51.8%
No 48.2%
15,034,670 votes
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Wow, it’s fair. DOMINION MACHINES weren’t used to calculate the results then!
The freedom of speech in the 1st Amendment to the constitution says that, there shouldn’t even be a poll to decide whether someone should be free to express his opinions.
Twitter is a thousand times more fun with Trump and his allies there.
Real People Yes 51.8%
Real People No 8.2%
Fake Bots No 40.0%
The First Amendment does not require that people be provided a platform from which to express their opinions.
Shouldn’t they have to recount, or wait till all the votes are in after the polls close?
Winner!
I realize there have been a lot of changes at Twitter (especially the leftist, woke, wackos leaving in droves).
I still wonder about all the bots that voted no. I know that in the long term those bots will be eliminated. I just wonder if a few (which then become thousands) are still around.
48 percent of 15 million.
That sure is a lot of people who don’t believe in freedom of speech.
censorship comes in different ways.
despite the following, which has been going on all over Brazil since the election, I have not seen a single report on the protests in the FakeWorldMSM anywhere:
19 Nov: Citizen Free Press: Incredible (election protest) footage from Brazil
VIDEO: 35s
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/incredible-footage-from-brazil/
This Tweet looks legit.
Elon Musk @elonmusk
The people have spoken.
Trump will be reinstated.
7:53 PM · Nov 19, 2022
Tucker mentioned them the first week they were occurring but don’t remember since.
I don’t know how fair it was. I’m thinking this poll might have been bot flypaper. That Musk, maybe just wanting to see an all out flexing of bot capability.
Bot trap!
Yep, I think Musk knew this would bring the bots out. Hopefully Musk can eliminate the ones he’s identified here.
That’s a hint of the Dems’ “democracy.” They would say no one not up in the popularity regions would have any rights at all.
A mouthy, arrogant student at the library complained we had the journal Church and State. She asked does that mean it supports the existence of churches to be allowed? I said it just discusses the two sides of arguments in a scholarly way. She said it should be banned along with any publication allowing for churches.
So all the voters her age, now in their 30s, would punish religions because they personally disagree. Democracy.
Trump has truth social he wants no part of twitter he spent his own money on truth social going back to twitter would mean the end of his company that he built from the ground up so it’s not gonna happen
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.