Posted on 10/02/2022 6:22:49 AM PDT by Rummyfan
Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, is a lawyer and conservative activist. She was called to testify before the “January 6 Committee” on Thursday. The first question is: about what? As to what purported criminality is she a witness?
NPR says that the committee’s chief focus was Thomas’s communications with John Eastman, quoting California Democratic Rep. Pete Aguilar:
“I’ll say broadly that the committee has been very clear that we’d like to hear from Ginni Thomas, her discussions and coordination to Mark Meadows and specifically to John Eastman,” he said.
Eastman is a law professor who had an interpretation of the Constitution and applicable federal law under which President Trump may have been able to legally challenge Joe Biden’s purported election victory. That didn’t happen, obviously, but so what? Is it somehow illegal to discuss legal ways of challenging alleged election results? Election challenges happen all the time, and occasionally they succeed.
Jonathan Turley, like Eastman a law professor, asks, “Why does a congressional committee care what Ginni Thomas ‘believes'”? Good question! Liberal media have accused Thomas of some kind of thought crime:
(Excerpt) Read more at powerlineblog.com ...
Since ... recently.
And gutless Republicans say nothing.
If the Republicrats manage to win the House do they have the balls to do the exact same thing regarding the 2016 election and subpoena every last presstitute and lying POS like Hillary,Clapper,Brennan,Comey....and FORCE them to Testify under oath about the Russian Collusion scam they pulled???
Think the last one was bad.? Wait till you see the next one... :(
They’ll just lie under oath like they’re done before
Let’s say that someone steals $1,000 from you, and gets away with it. There could be a number of reasons: The statute of limitation ended, a witness lied, the jury simply didn’t believe you, or whatever. Nevertheless, you’re out the $thousand, and the thief got away with it.
Does this mean it’s illegal for you to believe that he stole a thousand bucks from you? Is it illegal for you to tell others this? Of course not.
Everyone knows that private citizens are not allowed to to have nongovernment-sanctioned opinions, much less to share them with government officials.
The democrats are the kings and queens of racism. That’s why they always try to pin it on conservative Americans.
This stuff is all out of the Communist/Marxist playbook.
when demon driven liberals lock onto a person- they NEVER relent=- The liberal racists went after her husband big time, and now they are going after him and her at the same time- The left are flat out racists and should be called out on it repeatedly by the news media ‘on the right’
If wives of politicians pare are now officially fair game, when will it be Jill Biden’s turn to be grilled about Brandon’s mental state and who is scripting the course America is on?
Yep. What they say: "We want to discuss her conservative activities. The wife of a Supreme Court Justice should really be apolitical."
What they want to say: "This white b***h took a good black man and ruined him by twisting his mind so that he became a right wing nazi, depriving some black woman of a good husband! She is a disgrace to all women worldwide and an insult to all women of color!"
They are after Justice Thomas through Ginni. Just as they are after us through President Trump. The left and RINOs have abandoned any form of truth, service to the people and what principles they use to have and embraced their own elitism (pocketbooks).
P
bump
I love how these lowlifes at MSNBC actually think they have ANY credibility to call anyone a liar! Wow, a little self-realization would be nice once in a while...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.