Posted on 09/09/2022 4:51:30 PM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
Yeah, so you change/tweaked your statement.
I commented on Shedding of HIV. That’s not true.
Phiser Stated Released a STATMENT outlining both the shedding And the use of HIV protine in the vac ... I mean what do you need for proof ?
Noone is talking about the simple logic .. if they shed The Covid protine why aren’t they shedding the HIV protein as well...Really ?
They USED HIV Protein in the vac .. Now you tell me how they can be shedding some of them but not the HIV
Anyway i m Done with this stupidity
I only have one more comment
Ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin and FJB
“I only have one more comment
“Ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin ivermectin and FJB”
😁
I was only thinking of cigarettes but what the deuce John is third-hand marijuana bong smoke? I know of and recognize second hand smoke especially if a person was in a compact car with four heads toking away, but what is third hand smoke, I call your bluff and say there is no such thing. It's really cute that you threw in the bong though.
So, I googled it and sure enough it said the term originated in 2009 and seems they are calling residual nicotine on surfaces after smokers have stopped, smoking as third hand smoke. It is really stupid to call the absence of smoke, smoke. And when you think a moment, it would still be a second hand contact. And what did the bong have to do with it? It's all ludicrous at best and comical beyond belief.
I dont see how the graphine can be transphered ..
And what did the bong have to do with it? It’s all ludicrous at best and comical beyond belief.”
I read it here at FR...
Where is this statement?
Is Steve Kirsch the only one with a “Whistle Blower” type copy?
Here is what I posted:
___________________________________
“It has to be some version of *sunk cost*. They have predicated their entire course of action on *safe & effective* and just cannot accept they were wrong.”
__________________________________________
Since you apparently require explication, I put *sunk cost* inside special characters meant to convey that phrase was not to be taken exactly literally & also specified “...some version...”. One can *invest* time or effort or reputation into an enterprise and regard that as the investment expensive enough to be worth defending.
Note that I also specified *they*, plural, meaning _all_ those obviously so invested.
I shall share: you (those defending the position) have publicly committed to “safe & effective”, you (all) continue to so maintain this opinion and you (plural) have not to date on this forum admitted that could be erroneous in light of the evidence.
What should be our conclusion? Either you are simply stubborn and cannot recognize evidence or you have some vested interest in clinging to a proven fallacy. What could such a vested interest be?
You have made yourself into the subject of speculation by your own actions. You go to lengths to back those actions with claimed credentials. The medical institutions which issue those credentials and to which you are beholden by virtue of possession of them, is known to financially reward those who parrot the party line and financially punish those who do not. That is not in question. We apply logic to your group assertions and you individually yelp like the dog who is hit by the stone thrown at the entire pack.
An opinion is neither a lie nor perjury. I do believe that the process of committing to a stance on controversial issues represents an investment of oneself. The “safety & efficacy” of this shot that the entire globe is discussing and which at least half of that population regards as contributing to mortality and morbidity, is such a stance.
A parallel discussion taking place globally over the past year and half has been the refusal of proponents of “safety & efficacy” to back down even a bit. This has, despite volumes of gold-standard studies from recognized professionals with verified credentials who have risked the monolithic cancel culture in order to do the work and publish it under their own names, seemingly become the hill the anonymous proponents of lesser stature choose to die on. Rightly or wrongly, this prompts the rest of us to question “Why?”
Reams of varying published opinion, even in professional publications, exist to this point. This plethora of opinion understandably shifts as the discussion progresses and evidence continues to roll in from credible sources. That is the purpose of discussion: to refine one’s conclusions and prompt further investigation. It is a corollary to the scientific method.
The vaunted experts at the CDC have _admitted_ they were wrong by changing their own posted statements & guidelines. Deborah Brix has written in her book & repeated on video since publication that the Covid Task Force operated to push vaccine information they knew to be false on the POTUS, on the populace, and on the world. Similar admissions, some inadvertent, have been made by those at similar levels of authority. While not one entity offered even an insincere apology and some even cast themselves as victims while tripling down on castigating any questioners, they _did_ admit & imply that they knowingly committed ‘a noble lie###’.
Why can’t you?
###: A ‘noble lie’ is one told in order to perpetuate a ‘greater good’. Yet, the perpetrators of this one, that the vaccine is safe and effective, also admit that no good at all resulted from their own lies. It was, instead, a conscious lie repeated vociferously in order to knowingly further their own power & control in concert with unelected global NGOs presently in an open public process of advancing global governance.
errata:
Deborah BIRX
Lol ... just because something is impressive and beyond your experience doesnt mean its false ... not at all ... now the Problem with the Intellectual safe zone is ... Lack of adaptive ability to anything new or challenging that occurs outside of it.... here test yourself ... where did the left get the covid six feet rule ?
Its been the required - enforced safe distance between Prisoners for years
Heres on Where did the term M. R. f. K r .. come from ?
Ww11 ... when American Soldiers found out that several Asian cultures have the mother teaching the sun what to do in the marriage bed
Spirit cooking heard that before? Do you know where it came from?
It’s the term the Nazi SS used for torture... Documented years ago by French resistance fighters....
Why did they call it spirit cooking do you know?
Because they were harvesting Adrina chrome from those victims
I read it in books 25 years ago it’s not prevalent knowledge on the net
Let me know if you need any more education outside your safe zone
I’ve collected fringe information all my life
I knew Covid was coming out of China year before it did
I made 31 times my Available funds in about three weeks placing puts most of them at five or $.10
Let me know if you need to know anything else
In Fact ill give two free ones right now for next week ... in 3 weeks i want you ti have the ball s to respond ok ?
VTGN ... for a nice run totaling about 10 bags “ Precluding war or nuclear explosion on United States soil”
And PFE ... puts its about to crash past todays 1/2 value ... put out 6 mo at least
Ok ? Lets just See shall we ?
Lol ok .... have fun ... could be in total social chaos within 3 months
I note numerous vax shills have polluted the key word section of the post.
Some may question the site; however, it’s a shame they have time to impugn SHTF site, but no time to go look at the study cited...
That’s why I practice “social distancing”. I stay far away from those who have recently been “vaccinated” or “boosted”.
I’ve never before heard of a vaccine that required another vaccine “boost” every three months or so. Just that requirement alone tells me that these shots are useless. And, given the stories of vaccine injuries, and the number of people who have “dropped dead suddenly” shortly after the shot, I suspect they are harmful as well.
There are vax shills and government moles a plenty here polluting this once great website with their Deep State/Satanic lies.
They don’t want the truth to be posted, so they act like children and taunt those with opposing views along with the usual gaslighting techniques.
I feel sorry for those still in the delusion that the govt would never do anything to hurt us....
Ivermectin is your friend.
It binds with the spike protein produced by the jab
and its secondary effects. It is then eliminated from the body as waste.
The protocol is here:
https://covid19criticalcare.com/treatment-protocols/i-recover/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.