Posted on 07/21/2022 7:54:04 AM PDT by Red Badger
Effectively, the judges have ruled that Alex Jones is guilty before proven guilty and will instruct the jury to determine just how guilty he is.
In an unprecedented assault on due process and the rule of law, both a Texas and Connecticut judge have ruled that Alex Jones may not discuss the First Amendment, defend his innocence, or point out the rigged elements of the upcoming Sandy Hook defamation case against him.
Here is a limited breakdown of some of the most egregious constitutional violations of due process and the First Amendment as explained by a third-party legal adviser:
You have been denied your fundamental, constitutional due process right to present a defense in Texas or Connecticut. Both Judge Guerra Gamble (D) (Texas) and Judge Barbara Bellis have stripped you of your First Amendment rights for allegedly failing to provide enough discovery. Neither judge can deny that you responded to discovery, they just ruled that it was insufficient. The effect of these rulings, incredibly, is that you have been found guilty by two judges who never even held trials or heard any evidence.
Additionally, “since finding you guilty without listening to any evidence, Judge Guerra Gamble has repeatedly sanctioned you monetarily for exactly the same thing she has already sanctioned you for by declaring you guilty,” the adviser stated.
Judge Guerra Gamble has largely agreed that Alex Jones’ lawyers should be gagged during Alex Jones’ trial from:
Invoking the First Amendment in Alex Jones’ defense:
Arguing that the trial is in any way unfair or unjust to Alex Jones:
Arguing his innocence because Jones failed to produce documents that don’t exist:
Alex Jones has also been prohibited from asserting that the plaintiffs have become public figures by appearing on television, testifying before Congress, giving TED talks, and publishing books.
Finally, the Texas judge has determined that the “jury shall be instructed” to find any arguments about Infowars’ journalistic practices to be “established in favor of the Plaintiff.”
“Even the plaintiffs recognized this order was completely illegal and took the unprecedented step of asking the court to rescind it after you filed an appeal,” the legal adviser noted.
Jury selection for the defamation case begins on July, 25th 2022.
In constitutional republics, the accused are innocent until proven guilty.
In tyrannies, the accused are proclaimed guilty until proven guilty.
This is it America; due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, along with the First Amendment are being systematically destroyed by the judiciary to crush the political establishment’s opposition.
Read the ruling below:
SCRIBD VERSION AT LINK.........................
‘War Against The 1st Amendment.’ Alex Jones Appears For Questioning in Sandy Hook Lawsuit
“Use the msm as an example and Jones is innocent because they do that everyday.”
The MSM is smart enough (or at least experienced enough) to do so with plausible deniability.
Jones instead casts caution to the wind and often doesn’t bother with that.
So, yes, both are guilty, but one party is sophisticated enough to commit the crime in such a way that they are probably not going to be proven guilty, and the other is not.
The First Amendment does not mean that all persons or companies must provide a platform for anyone to speak about anything in any manner.
HA! Finally someone else has caught on to my favorite conspiracy theory!
I am impressed that you understand the rules—too bad the other side does not care about them.
By the way, the First Amendment does not grant any rights other than to be able to redress grievances with the Federal government, freedom of religious choice, and no state church.
Sometimes on threads like this one, FR feels like one big trailer park.
Nobody is taking away his rights. The judge wants him to present actual evidence, not conspiracy diatribe.
No, he was fair. Spontaneous, but fair.
‘They’ want us DEAD! The feds and these progressives are actively working to make it a legal reality.
“Alex Jones is one of the greatest patriots of our lifetime.”
Ha, well I wouldn’t go quite that far lol, though he’s certainly been right about some things, but he also has a tendency to go too far on other things. I believe in a number of ‘conspiracies’, JFK, 911, Oklahoma city bombing, ect, but some of that pizzagate stuff along with this Sandy hook stuff seems rather farfetched to me. But I admit I haven’t looked into all the details on those subjects so will withhold judgement on those matters.
If I were a judge you damned well bet I’d be unfavorably disposed to anyone saying “this is rigged” before the event.
The first amendment does *not* cover defamation of character (libel or slander), just as it does not cover incitement to riot, assault, or revealing classified intelligence (unless revealing such is in the national interest and shouldn’t have been classified).
If he knew his claims were false and still made them, therefore painting the parents as liars, that is *not* covered, never has been, never will be.
Having said all that counselor, how is this whole thing not a political witch hunt against a man who has been attacked and marginalized for years by the Leftist Mainstream Media and Social Media platforms? Or would you say blind justice is not blind and not justice?
Saying the law says what it says. Your or my opinion of if someone has been “marginalized for years..... “ is not pertinent to the matter. There are things you can’t say without getting sued.
Yes, they can. And they can throw someone in jail or fine them if they don’t.
I respect the Constitution. Liars who defame people and can’t prove their claims not so much.
There is no right to slander or libel.
HA! Finally someone else has caught on to my favorite conspiracy theory!
What would be the reason for the double identity? I'm not familiar with either one but if Bill Hicks said everything in an Alex Jokes persona, what would be the difference in Bill Hicks saying it himself?
Judicial tyranny bump! RIP USA.
Absolutely! It is 100% correct to take the Rights of those considered nut jobs, who incidently correspond to those we don’t like. It is a hoot to take the Rights of those away. The crying ,carerwaling, wailing, and howling starts when those same people take our Rights away. “Its is different when it concerns us”! goes the chorus.
Yes he was the “low hanging fruit” that was plucked and thrown into the trash with the Constitution. The only major media personality who defended him was Tucker.
Nobody wants to be associated with him on the Right, as they await their turn to be turned into a non-person.
You are correct. Like the question, was the School at Sandy Hook in service as a school or had it been taken out of service?
Why were no victims taken to hospitals and treated?
I could come up with more, but that would really get me pegged as an insane kook.
What you wrote....thumbs up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.