Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clubbed By The Fed? REITs, Like The S&P 500 Index, Are Getting Clubbed By The Fed's Rate Hike Expectations
Confounded Interest ^ | 05/03/2022 | Anthony B. Sanders

Posted on 05/03/2022 11:55:11 AM PDT by Browns Ultra Fan

As The Federal Reserve seems hellbent on raising interest rates to fight the rapid increases caused by Biden’s follicies, we see the S&P 500 index taking a hit in 2022, but NAREIT’s all equity index as well.

An example of how a REIT can be impacted by The Fed is the Industrial REIT index that tanked with Amazon’s declining earnings prospects.

While industrial REITs is a broad category, Amazon’s crashing EPS has certainly shocked the market.

Retail REITs? How about Simon Properties? Simon Properties, a large mall REIT, go “Fauci’d” as the Covid economic shutdown really caused pain for shopping malls. Simon’s occupancy rate has increased as the economy opens back up (we hope).

Meanwhile, Simon Properties equity has declined along with the S&P 500 index as The Fed raises rates. In other words, both the S&P 500 and shopping mall REITs are getting “Fauci’d” by The Fed. Or Powell’d.

Clubbed by The Fed.

(Excerpt) Read more at confoundedinterest.net ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Food; Government
KEYWORDS: amazon; biden; blogpimp; fed; realestate
Fed pretends that Biden's policies aren't to blame for inflation. Frauds.
1 posted on 05/03/2022 11:55:11 AM PDT by Browns Ultra Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Browns Ultra Fan
Oh darn. The Fed were evil for keeping interest rates low for so long, and now they are evil for raising interest rates.

Damned if they do and damned if they don't.

The real solution is to get rid of the Fed, let the market decide interest rates, and let private insurance companies takeover for the FDIC so that the more reliable banks can lend more money than they have in their customers' savings accounts.

2 posted on 05/03/2022 12:05:12 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (This is not a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Browns Ultra Fan

I got my wealthy pal to whom I give stock suggestions into SPG at 54. One of my best-ever calls. Now it’s 121. I’ve been yelling at him to exit the thing for the last 35 points down, but he’s a “buy and die” type.


3 posted on 05/03/2022 12:05:30 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

That makes far too much sense to ever be implemented.


4 posted on 05/03/2022 12:07:05 PM PDT by datura (Eventually, the Lord and the Truth will win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Browns Ultra Fan

The Federal Reserve tends to keep interest rates below true market rates.

In a 10% inflation environment and say a typical retiree marginal tax rate of 27%, interest rates should be about 13% to 14%.

How can people pay that? Many paid similar rates for years.

Borrowing at 5% to buy something going up at 10% a year is a true bargain. It beats paying 3% interest to buy something going up at 3% a year, if you can pay.

And it is possible to say have people pay just 3% on a 5% interest rate and tack the 2% difference onto the principle to keep payments highly affordable.


5 posted on 05/03/2022 12:11:43 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

The federal government should not be lending out money.

If there were no federal student loans, Trump would have clobbered Biden by maybe 7 million votes.

College can be financed by gain-sharing. If Junior the Graduate makes $31/hour instead of say a typical $15/hour wage, then Junior can share a percentage of his $16/hour educated premium, perhaps say two percent per year of college, for say up to 20 years. This would be $3200/year and would be far more as Junior rises up the corporate ladder.


6 posted on 05/03/2022 12:19:35 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Browns Ultra Fan

“the S&P 500 and shopping mall REITs....”

Though I no longer follow the market closely, it is my understanding that a correction is going on.

A correction is when stocks are repriced according to reality instead of being priced based on hope and puffery.


7 posted on 05/03/2022 12:24:45 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: datura

They’ll never give up that control and we’ll continue to elect those that want more.


8 posted on 05/03/2022 12:28:26 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Browns Ultra Fan

As for Amazon, leading companies tend to have more stable and predictable earnings as they are price setters.

I suspect [but can’t say for sure] that Amazon is suffering more from Chinese lockdown shortages than other factors.


9 posted on 05/03/2022 12:32:34 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin
They could also implement something like ROTC where a corporation can require a college graduate to work for them for a stipulated amount of time in exchange for college grants. The corporations would vet those in high school who are most likely to graduate from college with useful degrees.

Gone would be any major with the word "Studies" in it.

10 posted on 05/03/2022 12:35:17 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (This is not a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Browns Ultra Fan

The Fed feared a Covid recession but it overstimulated the markets, causing them not to function smoothly.


11 posted on 05/03/2022 12:35:42 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Many leading corporations were very willing to pay for further education when I was young.

I found college very stressful and never attended again after graduation.

I like the easygoing pace of Free Republic.


12 posted on 05/03/2022 12:39:07 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Browns Ultra Fan
I have no sympathy for these REIT managers.

I have clients in real estate development who were basically run out of business because they couldn’t afford to buy property for new projects and develop them for a decent profit. These huge REITs chased many smaller competitors out of the market because they were willing to accept tiny rates of return on their new industrial and commercial development projects. When your business model is based on a 10% return on your leases, you can bid $10 million for a project that will generate $1 million in annual lease revenue. You are always going to lose out to a REIT backed by giant institutional investors who are willing to pay $25 million for the same project because they think a 4% return on their investment is fantastic.

13 posted on 05/03/2022 12:46:46 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Mr. Potato Head ... Mr. Potato Head! Back doors are not secrets.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Browns Ultra Fan

It’s all part of the PRC/Dem plan to bankrupt not the Government but the American people!


14 posted on 05/03/2022 12:58:32 PM PDT by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

I always thought that as well. Colleges exchange their services for a “piece of the action” for 10-15 years.

That would have returned much better results than my student loans.


15 posted on 05/03/2022 1:05:30 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin
Corporations are willing to pay for higher education because the tax code gives them an incentive to do this in many circumstances. If you are pursuing an advanced degree related to your field of work, your employer can reimburse you for some or all of the cost and deduct it as a business-related expense. Importantly, the worker doesn’t have to report this benefit as taxable income.

The one big stipulation is that the education MUST relate to the job. That’s why I was able to get my employer to pay for a big portion of my master’s degree in a STEM field, while my coworker left the company in a huff because they refused to pay any of his expenses for law school.

16 posted on 05/03/2022 1:07:20 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Mr. Potato Head ... Mr. Potato Head! Back doors are not secrets.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

My company paid for grad school that way. They were careful about who signed on, but you were committed for a while.


17 posted on 05/03/2022 1:07:34 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

I’m suggesting to extend it to Bachelor’s degrees as well. More risk for the corporation, but a good deal if they want a leg up in getting the best recruits from an ever-tightening job market.


18 posted on 05/03/2022 1:12:14 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (This is not a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson