Skip to comments.
Durham Releases ‘Smoking Gun’ in Case Against Hillary Lawyer
pjmedia.com ^
| 4/5/2022 1143 hrs edt
| Matt Margolis
Posted on 04/05/2022 10:22:19 AM PDT by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Owwwww! Smoking gun! Breaking! Historical! Meanwhile at the super secret underground lair HQ of the DOH-j, Zzzzzzzzzzzz. Garland not interested.
1
posted on
04/05/2022 10:22:19 AM PDT
by
rktman
To: rktman
Doubt we see this in any mainstream news reports.
2
posted on
04/05/2022 10:24:20 AM PDT
by
OrangeHoof
("Rust" may be the first movie where the blooper reel gets more viewings than the actual film.)
To: rktman
Durham is still at the public trough, providing a meaningless distraction from time to time?
Way to go Durham, I bet your momma is proud.
3
posted on
04/05/2022 10:24:53 AM PDT
by
brownsfan
(It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
To: rktman
The money quote:
the existence … of attorney-client relationships that would have shed critical light on the origins of the allegations at issue.” “The defendant’s false statement to the FBI General Counsel ...misled the General Counsel .....abou the fact that the defendant was disseminating highly explosive allegations about a then-Presidential candidate on behalf of two specific clients, one of which was the opposing Presidential campaign,” Durham explained.
To: rktman
5
posted on
04/05/2022 10:27:59 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
It’s been 5 years since Trump tweeted this. What is taking so long?
To: rktman
SMOKING GUN! BOMBSHELL! BREAKING NEWS!
*Yawn*.
7
posted on
04/05/2022 10:29:25 AM PDT
by
jmacusa
(America. Founded by geniuses. Now governed by idiots. )
8
posted on
04/05/2022 10:31:44 AM PDT
by
dsrtsage
( Complexity is just simple lacking imagination)
To: brownsfan
[Durham is still at the public trough, providing a meaningless distraction from time to time?
Way to go Durham, I bet your momma is proud.]
You must be joking. What Durham did was the equivalent of looking through a several square mile landfill for something he did not even know existed and evidence re actions no one *knew* anything about that would stand up in a court of law. For an indictment, let alone a conviction, it’s not enough to have vague suspicions. You need hard proof. And the perps aren’t morons who leave tracks. These are some of the smartest people on the planet, with Ivy League degrees up the wazoo (it’s not that the Ivies made them smart - the Ivies are a filtering mechanism - you don’t get there without major league smarts). That Durham managed to get *anything* on Sussman is a minor miracle.
9
posted on
04/05/2022 10:33:29 AM PDT
by
Zhang Fei
(My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
To: rktman
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...
Wake me up when BiZiden is gone.
10
posted on
04/05/2022 10:34:05 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: rktman
Oh no, Sussman might get charged $12,000 in damages !!!
11
posted on
04/05/2022 10:34:10 AM PDT
by
swingdoc
To: jmacusa
Yep have heard Durham is going to do this and that for years. Nothing is going to happen here to the big fish and probably nothing to the little minions. The dual track justice system is firmly entrenched in the US Kangaroo Court system at this point.
12
posted on
04/05/2022 10:36:37 AM PDT
by
sarge83
To: rktman
Not only was it an oral reassurance to Baker, but a written message to Baker
from the Clinton hack lawyer as well. He lied at least twice to the FBI.
Will anybody care? We will have to wait and see.
13
posted on
04/05/2022 10:38:51 AM PDT
by
tennmountainman
( Less Lindell CONS, More AZ Style Audits)
To: sarge83
There are more than 2 tracks...
14
posted on
04/05/2022 10:39:41 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: brownsfan
Give it a break - he’s the only person in the corrupt DOJ circle that’s doing crap for the country.
Save some of that disgust for the thousand of DC white liberal ‘elite’ bureaucrats working against the American people every day.
15
posted on
04/05/2022 10:40:40 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(We can ignore reality, but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignorinbg reality. Ayn Rand)
To: rktman
Reminds me of all of the "We've got Trump now!" reactions from the Left.
16
posted on
04/05/2022 10:44:23 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary? Pray for Biden: Psalm 109:8)
To: rktman
This is actually a significant piece of evidence.
Will it ultimately matter? Magic 8 Ball says: "Reply hazy, try again."
To: Zhang Fei
<>"it’s not that the Ivies made them smart - the Ivies are a filtering mechanism - you don’t get there without major league smarts"<>I hope this is a joke.
Getting into the Ivies just means your family has money and/or clout.
Have you listened to these ninnies?
18
posted on
04/05/2022 10:46:05 AM PDT
by
Aevery_Freeman
(Enjoy your radioactive roots and berries!)
To: Aevery_Freeman
Anita Hill was selected as a girl and groomed and turned out to be not up to her task.
19
posted on
04/05/2022 10:48:11 AM PDT
by
bert
( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Promoting Afro Heritage diversity will destroy the democrats)
To: rktman; All
“Indeed, on September 18, 2016 at 7:24 p.m., i.e., the night before the defendant met with the General Counsel, the defendant conveyed the same lie in writing and sent the following text message to the General Counsel’s personal cellphone,” Durham wrote in the filing.
The text message, according to Durham, stated: “Jim—it’s Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and sensitive) I need to discuss. Do you have availability for a short meeting tomorrow? I’m coming on my own—not on behalf of a client or company—want to help the Bureau. Thanks.”
Baker replied: “Ok. I will find a time. What might work for you?”
Sussmann responded: “Any time but lunchtime—you name it.”
20
posted on
04/05/2022 10:49:05 AM PDT
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson