Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sorry Leftists, You Don't Get to Now Claim that You're Patriotic
Flopping Aces ^ | 03-30-22 | Brother Bob

Posted on 03/31/2022 9:26:57 AM PDT by Starman417

Once again, Sister Babe's subscription to The Washington Compost offered me some new insight into the insane Leftist mind, with this gem in the Sunday paper regarding confirming a Supreme Court Justice who happens to stand firmly with the new Leftist push to normalize child rape and is illiterate on basic biology. The Post's Theodore R. Johnson (TJ) found a bizarre new angle to support this radical Marxist - that the notion of Patriotism is being fought over by The Radical Left and us Normals. This seems odd, as for years The Radical Left that has seized control of The Democrat Party, Big Media, Big Education, etc. has been telling us how much they hate America, our flag, our history, our national anthem, our founding fathers, The Constitution, etc. I haven't written a post like this in a long time, but TJ's piece is so insane it's one where I can only post the entire article and add commentary. Without further ado:

Beneath the surface of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing this past week, another proceeding was underway. It went on quietly in the background, masked by two unending days of senatorial questions and monologuing that bookended all of the judge’s responses. Amid the inquiry into Jackson’s fitness to become the first Black woman on the nation’s highest court, American patriotism was on trial.
On trial? By who? We Normals have always loved this country. You Radicals dropped the word from our vocabulary somewhere around November 2016 and replaced it with the more sinister word, "Nationalism". No, you don't get to try to reclaim it now.
As the nation’s spotlight turned to the hearing, competing versions of patriotism were on display. Sen. Cory Booker’s, D-N.J., rousing and emotional speech on the second day of questioning typified one vision. “There is a love in this country that is extraordinary,” Booker said before pointing to Jackson’s parents, who faced Jim Crow’s racial discrimination, and saying, “They didn’t stop loving this country even though this country didn’t love them back.” Describing the discrimination faced by Black Americans and immigrants from China, Ireland and other countries, Booker said that real patriotism declares, “America, you may not love me yet, but I’m going to make this nation live up to its promise and hope.”

Booker’s speech echoed Jackson’s nomination acceptance remarks at the White House last month, her opening statement on the hearing’s first day and the tenor of many of her answers throughout. She paid homage to Black civil rights icons as she told the Senate, “I hope that you will see how much I love our country and the Constitution, and the rights that make us free.” And she called out the specific notes in Black Americans’ song of patriotism by explaining how her African name signaled both pride in her heritage and hope for our nation’s future.

This is one part where I have to give props to TJ as a writer. The way he frames Booker's monologue the words actually sound reasonable, even uplifting. Now watch the video of Booker. He comes off like some creepy high school dork sputtering at the girl he wants to ask to the prom but can't quite find the words to ask her out.
But these appeals ran headlong into another kind of patriotism. Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Josh Hawley, R-Mo., latched onto Jackson’s sentencing decisions in child pornography cases and used every opportunity to attack her judgment, character and competence. Hawley’s accusations were so inflammatory that even conservative commentators labeled it demagoguery and dishonest.
OK, this is the part where TJ is supposed to cite those "conservative commentators." Spoiler: he doesn't. And since when did supporting child molestation go mainstream? Did the 2021 elections in Virginia teach The Radical Left nothing?
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., challenged Jackson’s service as a public defender for four detainees at Guantánamo Bay and insinuated she relished the opportunity to represent terrorists against America.
I'd call this a fair point if Left Wing extremists had not spent the last year assailing any legal firms that wanted to provide pro bono representation for the political prisoners form the 1/6 Reichstag Fire.
Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., suggested that Jackson harbors a hidden agenda to go easy on violent criminals and child predators, as well as integrate critical race theory into grade schools and the legal system. On this latter point, both Cruz and Blackburn implied that Jackson’s mention of the 1619 Project in a speech and service on the board of a progressive Washington, D.C., private school that has an anti-racist action plan must mean she believes America is fundamentally and irredeemably racist. It seemed clear that the objective was to paint Jackson as unpatriotic, a threat to the country and a particular conception of the American way of life held by some in the GOP.
Emphasis mine in the last paragraph - "Anti-racist" may be the most perfect Orwellian Leftspeak for Leftists trying to project their own racism onto us Normals. And yes, like any average Leftist today, Jackson is unpatriotic and a threat to this country, particularly children.
One narrative told of an American patriotism, born of hardship and optimism and incremental progress, oriented on our nation’s professed ideals. The other professed a patriotism that is combative, subsisting on the identification of adversaries and promoting the constant presence of threat; an inward-facing intolerant form of nationalism. The former is expansive, inclusive and unifying; the latter, narrow, restricted and privileged. With race still central to national policy debates, the hearing presented Americans with these differing versions of what it means to love our country. The week gave us a taste of both and tacitly demanded that we identify which we prefer.
Another case where I have to give credit for good writing - note how TJ manages to perfectly paint both sides the exact opposite of what they truly represent.
To answer, we must reckon with what, exactly, American patriotism is. Definitions abound, but philosopher Stephen Nathanson offers some general contours of patriotism. In his book “Patriotism, Morality, and Peace,” he refers to it as “special affection for one’s own country, a sense of personal identification with the country, special concern for the well-being of the country, and willingness to sacrifice to promote the country’s good.” There is little objectionable here; but once theory meets our history, our identities and our visions for the country, things get complicated quickly. Not only does the expression of patriotism include an exaggerated kind that excuses cruelty and immorality, as well as an ethical sort that marries values to the national interest, but there is also no consensus on what American patriotism should look like or who can be its prototypical embodiment.
Again, emphasis mine. The definition of patriotism that Nathanson gives is dead on, and exactly how us Normals view America. Excusing cruelty and immorality is a good way to describe normalizing pedophilia, though.
In the United States, patriotism is connected to the national identity. And racial and ethnic minorities have long been perceived to be less American than white people. When a single race is connected to the national identity in a multiracial country founded on the idea of our inherent equality, the resulting hierarchy is especially disconcerting to those who are not members of the national identity group. As those who have been excluded and marginalized battle for inclusion in a nation they helped create and sustain, a choice emerges for the country: Receive these demands as opportunities to hew closer to the nation’s ideals; or see them as threats that must be resolved in an expedient manner.
By racist Leftists.

(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: blogpimp; pedophile; scotus

1 posted on 03/31/2022 9:26:57 AM PDT by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starman417

That diagram is priceless.


2 posted on 03/31/2022 9:28:44 AM PDT by sauropod (So may we start? When can we start?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel..................


3 posted on 03/31/2022 9:31:26 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

That last paragraph about a white founded identity... So welcome to the party, it ain’t that its founded by whites, but that blacks, pedofiles, homos, etc., all think whiteman bad so it has to change. Memo to DNC that it is your job to produce politicians to represent all Americans and not your mandate to change us, to hate whites, to destroy the economy and mainstream homosexuality and child abuse as normal - while you doing the changing, from Joe who touches and showers with children the president down, you are a queer lot who can only reproduce your self by molesting or raping others. If you hate Americans and America so much, try moving to some Arab country where buggering is all the rage after lights out in the barracks.


4 posted on 03/31/2022 10:53:34 AM PDT by Jumper ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson