Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Check this out. McConnell'S been playing Poker (SCOTUS)
TWITTER ^ | 26 MARCH 2022 | JIMBOMOPPERSAVES

Posted on 03/26/2022 4:43:45 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Lurkinanloomin
The Ds do not want this SC Nominee but they can't say so or they face the wrath of the Black Voters.

Either way, it works for me if HeSheIt is not approved.

41 posted on 03/26/2022 6:48:17 PM PDT by Pete from Shawnee Mission ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
The Ds do not want this SC Nominee but they can't say so or they face the wrath of the Black Voters.

Either way, it works for me if She is not approved.

42 posted on 03/26/2022 6:52:35 PM PDT by Pete from Shawnee Mission ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Actually, that’s not necessarily true. The law isn’t actually clear on that. The VP can break a tie on “legislation”, since this isn’t legislation, it isn’t clear if VP can break a tie for court nominees.

It’s never happened so it has never been tested. We shall see.


43 posted on 03/26/2022 7:04:18 PM PDT by Baldwin77 (If you put anything into my body WITHOUT my consent, IT IS RAPE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Hope it’s correct.

Personally, I never even understood the legal theory that produced a nomination for the Supreme Court without an actual vacancy.


44 posted on 03/26/2022 7:39:06 PM PDT by unlearner (Si vis pacem, para bellum. Let him who desires peace prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baldwin77

It doesn’t say legislation in the constitution. It simply says ties.


45 posted on 03/27/2022 3:33:27 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
The clear disconnect to still be invested in these systems is mind boggling to me. It's like being fixated on your loose snowshoe as the avalanche is ripping through the ground in front of you.

It's end game folks. Focus energies elsewhere.

46 posted on 03/27/2022 10:03:33 AM PDT by riri (Hope is not a strategy at this point- Sam Andrews)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I found this article interesting.

https://abovethelaw.com/2022/01/the-vice-president-cant-break-a-50-50-tie-for-the-supreme-court-and-no-one-cares/


47 posted on 03/28/2022 1:57:33 AM PDT by Baldwin77 (If you put anything into my body WITHOUT my consent, IT IS RAPE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Baldwin77

I agree there are those that hold that, but it wouldn’t stand, I don’t think, if ruled on by scotus.

The constitution says only this:

“The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.”

It is not in the section about legislation but that of information.

So, I think scotus would see it not restricted.


48 posted on 03/28/2022 2:33:42 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: chiller

Time for some claim chowder.

https://www.wistv.com/2022/03/31/sen-graham-oppose-jackson-scotus-nomination/


49 posted on 03/31/2022 1:21:45 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

it’s now a certainty the full senate would confirm KJB, but the question remains; what about the 11-11 committee. ....in particular Tillis.

I suppose squish Lindsey was a question, but after he walked out last week, I assumed he was a no.

No one’s talking about the committee vote, probably because mainstream media is trying to wash away any possibility she could be frozen out.


50 posted on 03/31/2022 2:42:49 PM PDT by chiller (Davey Crockett said: "Be sure you're right. Then go ahead'. I'm going ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson