Skip to comments.
Durham Tells Court Not To Dismiss Charge Against Lawyer Who Hid Ties To Clinton Campaign 
Zubu Brothers ^
 | 3-7-2022
 |  Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times
Posted on 03/07/2022 9:06:38 AM PST by blam
Edited on 03/07/2022 10:12:35 AM PST by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Special Counsel John Durham on March 4 told a federal judge not to dismiss a charge against a lawyer who lied to the FBI about representing Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.
Michael Sussman was representing the Clinton campaign when in 2016 he passed along information to an FBI counsel. His lawyers say the documents “raised national security concerns” while prosecutors describe them as purportedly detailing a covert channel between a Russian bank and the business of Donald Trump, Clinton’s rival at the time.
(Excerpt) Read more at zububrothers.com ...
TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: 2016election; 2020election; berylhowell; clinton; court; durham; election2016; election2020; grandjury; michaelsussman; sussman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-33 next  last
1
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:06:38 AM PST
by 
blam
 
To: blam
    Why would they dismiss the charge? They’d lock us up for lying to the feds.
 
2
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:11:56 AM PST
by 
bk1000
(Banned from Breitbart)
 
To: blam
    You don’t “tell” the court to do anything. You ask.
 
3
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:12:54 AM PST
by 
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
 
To: blam
4
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:15:41 AM PST
by 
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
 
To: blam
    Durham may be methodical, but he presents excellent arguments.
 
5
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:18:00 AM PST
by 
Navy Patriot
(Celebrate Decivilization)
 
To: blam
    Durham is reduced to begging the judge not to drop charges. 
 It's over. This is as good as we're going to get.
 
To: blam
    U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, an Obama nominee overseeing the case, will now decide whether to dismiss the charge against Sussman. Golly. I wonder which way this will go?
 
7
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:20:29 AM PST
by 
ClearCase_guy
(Ukraine is not a good country and does not deserve active US support.)
 
To: Navy Patriot
    That’s key!
One failure and it all crumbles.
 
8
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:21:01 AM PST
by 
Reily
 
To: Steely Tom
    She has nothing to worry about.
Plenty of Assistant Democrats to protect her.
 
9
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:21:39 AM PST
by 
Lurkinanloomin
( (Natural born citizens are born here of citizen parents)(Know Islam, No Peace-No  Islam, Know Peace)
 
To: Reily
10
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:22:22 AM PST
by 
Navy Patriot
(Celebrate Decivilization)
 
To: ClearCase_guy
    And yet, if the situation were reversed, and a judge for Trump were considering throwing out relevant info, or dismissing, the msm woild be al,,over it screaming about partisanship.
 
11
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:24:33 AM PST
by 
Bob434
 
To: blam
    Unfortunately, Durham is over a Beryl, obomma appointed judgette.
 
12
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:24:39 AM PST
by 
Migraine
( )
 
To: yesthatjallen
13
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:26:01 AM PST
by 
nesnah
(Infringe - act so as to limit or undermine [something]; encroach on)
 
To: ClearCase_guy
    I’m not so sure there. The Obama - Jarrett loyal leftists have no taste for anything Clinton. They would love nothing more than to see Hillarys fat a$$ picked and shredded slowly by Durham sea birds. They might even chum the water a bit to make it fun. The Clinton cabal is over and done.
 
14
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:27:06 AM PST
by 
blackdog
(# We Are Corn-Pop, turn off the news.)
 
To: Migraine
    Say FOOL....the horse is out of the barn. You were so Fing slow getting any useful information....your report NOW has no use at all.
 
15
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:27:34 AM PST
by 
mastertex
(mastertex)
 
To: blam
    Seems to me like they were only following orders given by the FBI and Hillary campaign.
But it looks like the little fish will fry while the big fish go free again.
 
16
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:27:56 AM PST
by 
airborne
(Thank you Rush for helping me find FreeRepublic! A 70's)
 
To: yesthatjallen
    Durham is reduced to begging the judge not to drop charges.I don't believe it's accurate to characterize it that way.
Durham gave an excellent response to a routine baseless motion by a crooked, ambulance chasing defense lawyer.
 
17
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:28:09 AM PST
by 
Navy Patriot
(Celebrate Decivilization)
 
To: yesthatjallen
    As long as Sniffer is in office.
 
To: mastertex
    Yeah, no doubt. Man I get so tired of that mugshot of him. Almost rather look at that stupid fuzzy tufted golfball virus thingy.
 
19
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:34:58 AM PST
by 
Migraine
( )
 
To: Steely Tom
    "Hillary, she lay low."
 Waiting for Durham to get the knife in the back from Merrick Garland, which looks like a near certainty. 
 Why a near certainty? 
 Because Jeffry Epstein buddy and former President Slick Willy Clinton is reconstituting the Clinton Global initiative, knowing a path is being planned for Cankles.
20
posted on 
03/07/2022 9:41:05 AM PST
by 
indthkr
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-33 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson