Posted on 02/05/2022 11:24:02 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
A good friend of mine had brain cancer. He was told that type was fairly common and should be treatable with little trouble. 2 weeks after the single tumor was found he was treated. Symptoms got crazy. A week after treatment they found it throughout his body. The doctors had no explanation. That was about 6 months ago. I bumped into the doctor not long ago and he mentioned he sees that all the time now. The problem started a couple of months after vaccination.
I never see them doing this with other shots. Everything they do screams red flag.
—
Indeed. There is something off kilter when they’re offering free gift cards, free pizza, or a large fry for what should be a personal health decision. “What if we throw in a cheeseburger and a small drink. Then will you take the shot?”
Actually, it was the DoD that debunked those Senate hearing claims.
*******************************************
LOL
I WATCHED THIS VIDEO.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/le9YlkEWqRPu/
Epoch times interviews Dr. Ryan Cole. Not sure if this is the same one referenced.
Attacking this guy is RIDICULOUS! We are so lucky to have BRILLIANT doctors like this.
A most interesting question. Beginning with the data as presented in graphic form, one finds that the graphs have a note at the bottom. It reads: "COVID-19 Data Repository by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University."
Therefore any "misinformation" redounds back to the Johns Hopkins University's Coronavirus Resource Center. It is a repackaging of the data, quite like other sites with the "official" data.
As to the web site itself, one reads from other pages in the site as follows:
"Measuring what matters --- On the closely integrated website SDG-Tracker.org we present the data and research on the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In 2015, all countries in the world signed up to reach the SDGs by 2030 and we built this site to track progress towards them. Our SDG-Tracker is a widely accessed publication that presents all the latest available data on the 232 SDG-Indicators with which the 17 Goals are assessed."
https://ourworldindata.org/about
And....
And as to their funding, one reads of their grants --- "Our World in Data is supported by grants from the Quadrature Climate Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and a grant from the German entrepreneur, businesswoman and philanthropist Susanne Klatten. In the past we have also received grants from the World Health Organization, the Department of Health and Social Care in the United Kingdom, the Centre for Effective Altruism – Effective Altruism Meta Fund, and the Nuffield Foundation."
https://ourworldindata.org/funding
Looking further to the first grantor: "We [ QCF ] build robust, fully-automated technology to predict and trade all liquid electronic financial markets."
As to the last mentioned "...she [ Klatten ] inherited his 50.1% stake in pharmaceutical and chemicals manufacturer Altana.
As to the Gates foundation, think what you will, though recall he said the vaccine business was the most profitable investment in the world. Research more as you will.
Your question, "Where's the misinformation at this chart?" is a very large one. At it's root the question addresses the beginning of the entire, worldwide event. To become lost in minutiae is to lose sight of the whole.
The whole is embedded in the site's "closely integrated website SDG-Tracker.org." From that site one reads: "The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are targets for global development adopted in September 2015, set to be achieved by 2030. All countries of the world have agreed to work towards achieving these goals."
So your question about "misinformation" in a chart -- one of many on the page -- breeds a far greater picture than you probably intended.
You are asking about the whole "United Nations Sustainable Development Goals" and those with enormous wealth supporting those "sustainable" goals. Are they your goals? Then you will find no misinformation at all.
If your question is sincere, then the pandemic event is as follows:
( 5,674,493 "JHU official" global deaths / 7,924,043,134 global population ) x 100 = 0.072 % worldwide mortality rate over two years.
Less than one tenth of one percent "officially" Covid dead over two years worldwide.
But an enormously profitable event for quite a number of very wealthy individuals. They cluster in those supporting the goals as above. Enjoy some additional research.
I never see them doing this with other shots.
*******************************************
Well, that’s not exactly true. They have always gone on the attack against anyone that has ever spoken out against vaccines.
Social media silenced them, and the MSM mocked them.
The weird incentives.. cash, food, products, services, etc.
Wow Worldtraveler, you found a lot of information on sciencefeedback.co background.
I found on their website:
https://sciencefeedback.co/partners-funders-donors/
Facebook, Google, Citris among others. Plus they have the seal from INTERNATIONAL Factchecker’s network
Science Feedback has received accreditation from the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) at The Poynter Institute. Previously accredited based on its Climate Feedback platform, Science Feedback now includes Health Feedback, which focuses on vetting trending health-related claims.
Won’t even get started on Poynter except to say that if they could they would probably want to shut down the this site since they are affiliated with many global media censors and causes. https://www.poynter.org/coronavirusfactsalliance/
DugwayDuke, Nice globalist-aligned source ya got there. It’s called research, and I am surprised that a poster with a 1999 start date would post globalist sites, but then the vaccines are about globalism and with your start date you should get it....Either you did not know you posted a globalist, elitist leaning/funded link, or you knew and support them...
I personally know 2 people who got terminal cancer after get the shot. One has died and the other is in hospice now not expected to live through the weekend.
Please pray for Shirley
—————
I know of one that just died of cancer , extremely aggressive, gone in four months. The family is certain the jab did him in. Add to that one , one currently fighting cancer now under treatment ( lymph), and one who just had her cancer come raging back and just had surgery to remove aggressive female parts tumors, another 32 YO just diagnosed with a brain tumor( two days ago) on the pituitary gland, and two cancers reported from co-workers, ALL had the jab and a few the boosters. At 63, I have NEVER in my life seen such an outbreak of cancer!
kara37 wrote: “LOL”
“But these figures are wrong. They resulted from a glitch in the database, a military spokesperson said.”
The military (DoD) admitted that these claims were based upon an incorrect database.
Freedom56v2 wrote: “Nice globalist-aligned source ya got there. It’s called research, and I am surprised that a poster with a 1999 start date would post globalist sites, but then the vaccines are about globalism and with your start date you should get it....Either you did not know you posted a globalist, elitist leaning/funded link, or you knew and support them...”
The consensus of the anti-vaxxers posting here is that any source, any data, that does not support the anti-vaxxer propaganda narrative must be false. That’s a variant of the ad hominin argument. Attacking the source, not the argument.
I’m surrounded by the evidence of real people that had cancer recur after the clot shot.
———————-
I posted my stories about all the cancers around me, I can add the deaths from from two elderly, one 72 and 74, both got heart problems after the first jab, both got strokes after the second jab, BOTH died very shortly after the booster. As doctor Cole mentioned location and Vitamin D factor, my brother in Chicago has stated to me the huge amounts of cancer and death in his “ circle”, neighbors, coworkers, and friends.
I don’t need .gov numbers and statistics, all I need to do is look around my front yard. Something very wicked and sinister has been unleashed, time is finally beginning to tell a horrible story.
Huge denial is coming from the vaxed. Human nature at it’s best. Who will ever admit they were hoodwinked and tricked into getting jabbed?
A lovely turnaround, making a 'global' assertion about another's viewpoint while pretending to drape yourself in "shoot the messenger," something you also are doing.
Let's discuss/debate any point as to the Covid history, data taxonomy, data collection, analysis and reporting. Perhaps critique all sides?
Let's discuss/debate with sources critiqued as debate can allow.
But to include the word "propaganda" in your response suggests that your tagline is wholly true for you -- "Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with."
The experts with which you seem to agree align with the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, with the goals of the Gates Foundation, with the Biden administration's Covid goals, and beyond. Or do I misunderstand your position. The floor is yours.
Is Johns Hopkins University’s data false? A hotbed of anti-vax misinformation?
https://ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths
Is Israel’s skyrocketing fatality rate a statistical anomaly? A fabrication?
—> Huge denial is coming from the vaxed. Human nature at it’s best. Who will ever admit they were hoodwinked and tricked into getting jabbed?
“It’s easier to fool a man than to convince him he’s been fooled.”
- Twain
No scientific evidence…
With reports of +300% cancer occurrences in the military, someone should do a study. With real data. Science needs data.
“But these figures are wrong. They resulted from a glitch in the database, a military spokesperson said.”
********************************
Yeah, okay. I don’t believe a word they say.
No kidding, he was here like 6 minutes after the thread was posted with a “rebuttal”. Almost like it’s a day job.
So lie and say you got the shot.
Oh yes, fact checking sources matter to me. They have an agenda—their funders do as well.
But frankly, I don’t think the factcheckers have nearly the credentials and experience of Dr. Cole and others like Dr. McCullough and Malone whom they classify as spreading false information.
Again, I would not a FaceBook fact check either—but then they work with this group.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.