Bad news for freedom, good news for small farms. Already locally the price of food has helped local farmers increase profits or at least become viable.
Pretty funny
Probably, they will just cover the land with solar cells and windmills.
Er, buying land is not “seizing” it.
Well, there IS a difference between buying farmland and seizing it.
While I don’t disagree with the plot to do this for the stated reasons, lets not get carried away with the clickbait words like ‘seizing’....
Yet, anyway. That time may be coming soon, but it will start a shooting war. And those blue UN helmets make a mighty nice target.
So many government actions, under various disguises, seem to come together with the ultimate effect of reducing population.
Basically it’s Collective Farms.
Will they be seizing all the farmland Bill Gates acquired with the dollars rolled off the printing presses by the Fed?
Is the plan to limit food and only keep certain folks alive? Im sure that will be well received by all.
Used to be you could drain a wet patch in a field that had grown up in trees and clear it if it had old pre-existing drain tile through it
10 years or so ago, they changed that and took prime farmland with junk trees off the table
Just another part of the Great Reset. The rich are going to divvy up all the natural resources of the planet and they hope to be leaving the planet before it’s totally ruined. The trans-humanism movement is all about going beyond the natural biological limits of being human. They plan to meld with machine and AI to live longer, think faster and handle long distance space travel.
Which is completely in conflict with the alternative energy crowd who are pushing to build wind and solar panel farms that consume vast amounts of land.
There is no dispute that fossil fuels contribute CO2 to the atmosphere and can influence climate. The tragedy is that the solution to this problem was laid out by President Eisenhower in the 1950’s and was known as “Atoms for Peace”. Until the 1970’s even groups like the Sierra Club and Greenpeace were big supporters.
Then people like Ralph Nader, Jane Fonda, Pat and Jerry Brown, and other anti-nuclear zealots began gaslighting the public about the dangers of nuclear power which they intentionally conflated with nuclear weapons. Much of this propaganda was cynically funded by the large fossil fuel companies who were the largest contributors to the “conservation” groups opposed to nuclear. Fossil fuel pollution has killed millions while 60 years of nuclear power have killed about 100 around the world from accidents and radiation including Chernobyl.
Wind and solar are too dilute and unreliable as sources to make a dent in the fossil fuel industry. This is why the companies pretend to back them knowing that they are doomed as competitors. Nuclear produces a tiny amount of waste with no CO2 for the energy created compared to all other chemical sources.
Ain't democrats special?
And we thought input costs were going to be our biggest problem.
Wonder if they’ll go for the guy with small acreage or Bill Gates’ 6,000 acre plot (that’s 10 square miles near Columbus, Ohio)?
I live in rural farmaland area and live on a small farm.
3/4 of the fields in my county are not even planted. We have so much grain and corn it is sitting in silos.
If our local farmers planted all their fields a loaf of bread would be 10 cents.
The US has a huge overabundance of food right now.
This underlying article is absolute gibberish. The Eminent Domain crap is being pulled completely out of thin air.
This underlying article is absolute gibberish. The Eminent Domain crap is being pulled completely out of thin air, and the headline is basically just made up. Not a single link to anything approaching a legitimate source.
US Kulak’s are armed.
Won’t be killed easily.
Why does the lying title say “seized”?
Carbon Credits are the next great financial scam