Posted on 12/28/2021 12:00:19 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
The CDC's latest count of deaths attributed to COVID-19 vaccines is nearly 20,000, but a study by researchers at Columbia University estimates the actual number is 20 times higher.
The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, or VAERS, reports 19,886 deaths, 102,857 hospitalizations and a total of 946,461 adverse events due to COVID-19 vaccines through Dec. 3.
If the Columbia study's underreporting factor is correct, it would mean that there are nearly 400,000 deaths due to COVID-19 vaccines.
COVID vaccination and age-stratified all-cause mortality risk ... suggests the risks of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the benefits in children, young adults and older adults with low occupational risk or previous coronavirus exposure.https://t.co/eiGoHVzrqE
— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) December 15, 2021
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
The CDC may lie but no one can honestly say the CDC attributes all those VAERS deaths to the vaccines.
Yet you post and defend lying articles like this one.
So why does the author lie and say the CDC attributes the deaths to the vaccines?
The CDC says, “COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective.”
Really? What is the definition of “safe”? The vaccine was not safe for Seattleite Jessica Wilson, a 37-year-old married mother of two, who was forced to get the vaccine so she could volunteer at their school. She died the next day of blood clots. Does that fall into the definition of “safe”?
You seem more comfortable pointing out the authors little lie than pointing out at all the CDC's statement that is most likely a big fat dangerous lie.
Was it the J&J vaccine and was it verified to have been caused by that vaccine?
There's a known, rare issue that makes J&J unsafe for a very, very small population.
I'm not blindly defending the CDC but I need to see some evidence.
The fact that almost all of these 'vaccines are deadly' articles rely on dishonest misrepresentations of VAERS data makes me skeptical that any reliable evidence of severe risks exists.
If it does the authors should use it instead of blatantly lying like this one does.
You need some new material. A recent Freedom of Information request has resulted in some of Pfizer’s own data being revealed.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/bombshell-document-dump-pfizer-vaccine-data/5763397
By just February of 2021, Pfizer had already received more than 1,200 reports of deaths allegedly caused by the vaccine and tens of thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders.
Bear in mind, this is Pfizer’s own data.
It was the J&J.
I do not care if it is “rare” or not - Jessica Wilson died from a vaccine that she was forced to take in order to be involved in her children’s school. That is criminal. It is doubtful that anyone will suffer repercussions from this abhorrent decision. And the vaccines will continue to be touted as “safe and efficient.”
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/seattle-woman-died-covid-vaccine/
Actually, you're the one who needs new material.
This is the exact same misrepresentation being made about VAERS.
I've seen the Pfizer document and exactly zero of the deaths reported following vaccination were attributed to the vaccine.
Zero.
VAERS and other government-sanctioned reporting systems are the most accurate information anyone has regarding vaccine deaths. Pfizer itself is using that data in its internal reports. If that’s upsetting to you, you could lodge a complaint with Pfizer.
I think that's terrible, but lying about other deaths in no way honors hers.
The CDC is in on it. Come out from under your rock
Right. So when they say:
we should listen.
Given that many people at the the FDA and CDC work together and review VAERS, and tens of thousands of healthcare providers work with and submit to VAERS, what's your best guess on the number of people in on this conspiracy?
Totally agree. No one should be lying about or distorting anything related to Covid, vaccines, whatever.
Some researchers would say the CDC is only CYA with those statements, and that the.number of deaths listed in VAERS is actually vastly understated. Such as these researchers at Columbia University whose study forms the basis of this thread.
Claiming 400,00 attributable vaccine deaths is quite a lot, and likely not something a prestigious university would allege, if they weren’t extremely confident in a high number of vaccine deaths. Something significantly more than just your number of 6, don’t you think? Or is your theory that Columbia is a bastion of right wing conspiracy theorists?
>>The CDC attributes exactly nine deaths to the vaccines, all with J&J and none with the mRNA ones<<
Well gee wizz, I know one who died after getting Moderna x2. Another coworker received J&J x 1 and had a stroke. Docs did a D-Dimer test and found he had multiple clotting.
A coworker told me he pissed blood for two weeks after receiving Pfizer x2.
A guy that works in the same lab as I received Pfizer x 2 back in April and develop Bells Palsy. Now on anti-seizure meds to calm down the nasty left side facial twitch he lives with.
A vendor friend of mine received the Pfizer x 2 and developed a nasty rash on his chest, but his stepdaughter is now bed ridden and dying of a neurological ailment.
None of these to my knowledge was reported on the VAERS database. In fact, sounded like when questioning them, Docs were wishy warshy whether to link to vaccines.
Harmless vaccines? Yea, right. Five in my immediate orbit suffered death or serious adverse reactions. A bit close to home for me.
I don't know anyone who disputes that. Technically, every death that occurs following a vaccination should be reported, and the CDC isn't definitive on how long after. Of course there are going to be tons of deaths that aren't reported because no one associated them with the shot.
Claiming 400,00 attributable vaccine deaths is quite a lot, and likely not something a prestigious university would allege...
You're right on both counts. The statistical analysis says nothing about attribution to the vaccine and it isn't Columbia University putting their name to it. It's an unreviewed statistical model by a psychiatrist who happens to work at Columbia.
So I can either rely on what you said are the most reliable systems for reporting the data, and the professionals who actually review each death including medical histories, etc., or on the computer modeling of someone well outside of his field.
Yea but she died of blood clots not the vaccine.
He died of lung cancer not cigarettes.
He died of a heart attack not the eight ball of coke.
They died of blood loss not the bullet wound.
The CDC can say whatever they want.
Some people believe anything.
Again, do you actually believe that only nine people have died as a result of COVID “vaccine” injuries? You can’t be that naive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.