unlimited image hosting
Posted on 12/15/2021 9:13:24 PM PST by ProfessorGoldiloxx
"The source told the outlet that she "felt disgusted" and felt the need to come forward because "these people with power seem to get away with it."
Wednesday night, Project Veritas published graphic texts and videos of a CNN producer fantasizing about molesting his fiancé’s daughter.
According to the outlet, one text exchange featured the producer telling the source how his fiancé’s daughter was "wearing very closely cut bottoms at the pool," before graphically describing how he could see the outline of her genitals. ..."
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostmillennial.com ...
It seems as if there is an epidemic of child molesters at AT&T’s CNN. I know they are trying to sell the channel off but just hit a regulatory snag and haven’t done so yet, plus they have owned it for 5 years now so they are responsible for what goes on there.
Its never ending.
Hopefully the new owner will start mass firings—too big a waste of time to figure out who is worth keeping.
WTAF?!!?
The article never indicates when we the general public will know who this is, if that is indeed the intention.
Is there a date set for Don Lemon’s case to go to court?
This person belongs in jail, if the girl's father doesn't get to him first.
The left keeps telling us that shooting randomly into liberal crowds will not always get child molesters, career criminals and women beaters.
All these high profile folks....And PizzaGate is just another conspiracy.
ThankQ, Project Veritas....
Has he been named?
He was saying this to a woman he was seeing who was ‘ a case manager for human trafficking victims, as well as those of domestic violence and sexual assault.’. He wanted nude photos of her daughter too.
Everything is mortifying.
They are not coming for your children.
Even if they say so.
And to believe they are means that you are a possible pedophile yourself because only a pervert would believe otherwise.
What I don’t understand is how this woman continued to talk to him after he wanted nudes of her own daughter.
Any one, or any agency that supports Chomo Joe Biden supports pedos and chomos.
Toobin, playing his skin flute. Is that the same as
“blowing your own horn”?
h/t cockroach_magoo
<><>it’s not okay for a CNN producer to groom children,
<><>but it is okay when public school administrators do it.
Vermont school commits to kiddie porn as enlightening for children:
The school has proclaimed it has the duty to expose
children to pornographic imagery — to support free speech
American Thinker ^ | 12/11/2021 | John Klar
Posted on 12/11/2021, 11:54:58 PM by SeekAndFind
Vermont’s Essex-Westford School District, which includes the town of Essex that last year fired a high school lifeguard for merely questioning Critical Race Theory, has done it again. In the midst of a national furor over a sexually explicit graphic novel, the school has proclaimed it has the duty to expose children to pornographic imagery — to support free speech.
It is axiomatic that free speech rights do not extend fully into schools — they never have. For example, the First Amendment protects quite a shocking variety of pornographic materials, including bondage and rape videos. Are those acceptable, protected school teaching materials? School administrations are supposed to be answerable to the appropriate needs of children.
But ESWD has declared itself the champion of the minuscule percentage of children afflicted with gender dysphoria, which not only is rare, but most often disappears with adulthood. All children must be sacrificed at Essex-Westford.
The book in question, Gender Queer, created a national controversy not because the subject of the book is a “non-binary” student (a multitude of such titles abound, as all informed parents are now unavoidably aware), but because the book features “pages of explicit illustrations depicting oral sex [sic].” The school’s defiant letter to parents avoids mentioning this fact, instead proclaiming itself the defender of constitutional values:
Essex High School recently learned that a gender-affirming book in our library is being discussed on various websites. There is a long history of certain books being banned in the United States, so this is not a new conversation.
This sentence marks the beginning of a perverse justification for distributing pornography to children. The rationale employed would serve to groom children sexually for adult sodomy as a child’s “right.”
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.