Posted on 12/07/2021 3:59:07 PM PST by Peter ODonnell
I refer to the need for a revolution, but in technical terms it would be a counter-revolution.
Globalists have more or less completed a revolution. It began in stages in the 1990s, grew to a flood in the Obama presidency (usurpation if you prefer).
A significant number of Americans said, "wait, we are not in favor of this," and placed Donald Trump in office. This counter-revolutionary move was only partially effective because a lot of parts of the legislative branch were not sufficiently changed, so Donald Trump had to waste a lot of his energy appealing to a hostile Congress to support the agenda that a majority had voted in. That was another component of the revolution to which I already referred.
Then came the "kill shot" of the revolution, an apparently stolen election, or if you wanted to be charitable, a colossal mistake of judgement by many Americans supported by a new flood of voters from outside the country. This coalition, whether they won legitimately or not, has brought the revolution to a nearly permanent status. The current administration is being led by a cabal of unelected persons using a largely incompetent figurehead and his very unpopular second in command, to push forward what amounts to a takeover of the American government by the United Nations and international globalism. The forward progress of this stage of revolution may be somewhat slowed by the last traces of resistance and the sheer audacity of stealing a country from under the feet of its own inhabitants.
And make no mistake, as a person living outside the country I could easily walk away and say, "well that's their problem." But it's my problem too, the problem of every person in what used to be known as the free world, who still believes in freedom, liberty, prosperity, and rational government.
This globalist revolution is anything but the above. Barely hidden from view is the desire to punish America for its success, under the mistaken belief that this success comes at the expense of somebody else (an underclass within, or foreigners somehow deprived of their natural position in the world).
Historical friends of the United States, countries like Taiwan, South Korea, to some extent Japan or Israel, eastern European nations freed from communism, the more enlightened Islamic countries, and the conservative minorities in NATO allies and similar smaller nations -- all can agree that America has stolen nothing from them, it has given over many decades and participated in shared struggles for freedom around the world.
So be aware that you have friends, but you don't really need these friends to mount a counter-revolution. I merely want to encourage it, because you deserve to return to the right path, the path that America was on under Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump.
And to get there, it will take counter-revolution. But does that mean a civil war? I don't think so. The key element of this counter-revolution must be the transformation of the Republican Party into a full supporting partner of the Trump movement, or if it morphs into this, the de Santis presidential campaign of 2024.
Whichever of those two options is chosen, and I think the decision lies mainly in Donald Trump's hands, there must be an all-out political struggle to recover the reins of government at all levels. If this takes some fairly drastic action, so be it. What might drastic action involve?
Perhaps not so drastic, but it will appear that way to progressives, a determination to oversee a fair election process. This needs to be a key goal of freedom partners at all levels of government and society from now through the 2022 mid-terms and into the run up to the 2024 presidential elections. There can be no halfway measures or compromises made. Other countries have managed to create reliable voting processes, there is nothing but corruption and criminal inertia to stop the United States from holding a fair and reliable election. All it takes is registration of actual voters and a system to screen their voting when they show up, so they only vote once.
Mail-in voting or even worse on-line voting is too open to manipulation. So this needs to be a red line issue, wherein the freedom coalition says to the globalists, either we have fair elections, or we have a civil war. Your choice. And you will lose that civil war to us.
I don't look at this as a suggestion but a prophecy. This will happen regardless of whether I say it or not. So take hope in this rather dark time, that the nation cannot be restored. Under the motto, we do not consent and we do not agree, the nation can be restored to its rightful path forward. And hopefully it will inspire future generations to continue along that path, once the careers of Donald Trump, Governor de Santis, Ted Cruz and the few others who stand on the right side of these issues, have come and gone. There you have three worthy candidates for president and they don't need to take each other on, they can take turns. I hope they will.
All the other issues would fall in line behind voting reforms. A return to a sane economy with the green agenda reduced to a rational component -- it does not need to be entirely abandoned as parts of it represent inevitable progress but it needs to be placed on realistic timetables that will not overwhelm the prosperity of the nation. Then of course there must be a rethinking of these insane protocols around dubious pandemic threats, and a shifting of responsibility from the state to the individual. If a person is scared they will get sick or die, let them take the necessary steps to deal with it, this backwards logic of building a society for the weak and vulnerable at the expense of all rational social norms, will wreck the country and leave it vulnerable in an entirely new way to a permanent revolution, except that could itself be exploited by even worse actors than the globalists (I mean the Chinese and the Islamists in case you're living in a cave).
We have to take very resolute action. And there needs to be a re-commitment to the rule of law. The defunding concept is basically an appeal to anarchy and mob violence, a crime wave of unprecedented proportions, and social breakdown. It must be stopped in its tracks. And the rich and powerful must become subject to the rule of law just as the weak and powerless are today. Too many of criminal intentions have gotten away with massive crimes in plain sight, and everybody knows it. This leads to the demoralization of the society, as people look on and say, these people are too powerful to fight, who can get rid of them and stop their crimes against the nation, because make no mistake, this goes deeper than just self-enrichment which would be bad enough, this goes as high as treason.
We live in times where prominent individuals commit treason on a regular basis and face no punishment.
They are lucky anyone would even consider a non-violent response to their crimes, because the law of history is that such people open themselves up to the solution applied to Mussolini and the Caecescus of Romania.
Perhaps that is the only way out. We should at least explore the non-violent option first, and if it is found that the crimes against the nation are increasing and becoming more odious, then certainly there is every justification for the use of force to restore the Constitution which right now lies in a state of disrepair. The founding fathers would not be happy to see the mess these globalist revolutionaries have made of their Republic. I don't think they would be as patient as any of us.
My tagline.
Usurpation is what it was, Obama in NIT a natural born citizen.
And ALL of our elected and appointed were complicit in the abrogation of the Constitution.
Usurpation is what it was, Obama is NOT a natural born citizen.
And ALL of our elected and appointed were complicit in the abrogation of the Constitution.
Yep,
I hang my head in shame what we've let become of this awesome nation.
Take it kinetic and Nuremberg the survivors.
Great speech. But now what? The globalist “revolution” began WELL before the 1990s. And we’ve been talking/hearing/reading about “civil war” since Bubba Clinton’s impeachment. As yet there has been no real plan and no real action. Will there be? Are there enough to make it happen? I’m sorry to say, I don’t think so. The Left continues to gain ground thru (mostly) apathy and ATTRITION.
“A people unwilling to use extreme violent force to obtain or secure their liberty deserves the tyrannts that rule them”
Who are you quoting?
Interesting. Several comments.
Politics is downstream of culture. This essay instantly went to politics, without considering that the bigger cultural issues. This is significant because the average person can have far more influence over culture than they can politics.
There was also the assumption that elections could be “corrected” by ensuring that registrations are valid and the votes fairly counted. Frankly, that’s absurd. The political powers that be make the rules, decide which parties may participate, select the candidates, register the voters, run the elections, and count the votes. What makes us think that this process is or ever will be run to the advantage of conservatives? Elections are not about selecting leaders, they’re about social control.
And finally, there is the truly naive assumption that if, God forbid, we end up in a civil conflict, that somehow the “good” guys would win. What in the world would lead us to believe that? Because many of us own guns? Do we honestly believe that a civil conflict here would be more honorably dealt with than it was in say, Syria? Or Cambodia? Do we really think that those lusting over power would refrain from using any and all weapons at their disposal? Talk of civil war is insane. I for one have no interest in seeing American cities ruined and our people massacred.
Who am I quoting, myself.
“This is significant because the average person can have far more influence over culture than they can politics.”
Culture is politics.
Civil War, nothing civil about it.
America hasn’t been a constitutional republic since the Civil War. It was remodeled into a corporation in 1871 and has been operating under disguise as a constitutional republic to keep the population fooled.
Voting for Republicans in 2022 2024 doesn’t address that our country has been stolen for over 150 years, that we’ve been lied to about it’s true current form or that the government views us as mere Human Resources.
We have to do our own political status reset if we want what we had at the founding of this country. We’ve got to undo the incorporation of the United States from 1871 and renounce our partnership with the global corporate bankruptcy system. The original Federation has sovereign immunity and can not go bankrupt.
We’ve also got to do away with fraudulent public registry programs that FDR put in place which register Americans and their labor as public property to be secretly sold as collateral against the government’s debt. We do not serve the federal government and are not it’s employees or property.
>Who am I quoting, myself.
Any concrete examples of your own behavior to share or is just something you encourage others to do on your behalf?
I mean, who are people supposed to start shooting? I see all these calls to resist with the blood of patriots etc, revolution, but practically speaking, what is in your minds?
The American Revolution wanted the clearly marked redcoats out and fought them physically. I know. Who are the patriots now supposed to fight? Is it imagined we randomly attack known democrats, or no party preference, r or libertarians, or anyone whose voting record we know and dislike? Or appointed bureaucrats who are overdoing their authority? Or elected officials or police? I am not willing to do any of these things and I am not sure what people actually mean when they call for physical fighting against the great reset or etc.
The only physical activity I can reasonably see is defending ourselves, innocent others and our property during riots if the police won’t. Which is normally legal. Rotten house got severely abused but he did win the day.
Rittenhouse autocorrected to rotten house. No disrespect to a fine young American intended.
Does "toughing-out" COVID rather than taking the vaccine just to get a natural immunity count?
Does quitting a high-paying, work-from-home, dream job with excellent benefits rather than submit to the "jab" count?
Does relocating from the city to create a rural homestead for my adult sons and their families count?
Does becoming fully prepared years in advance count?
Does spending years building a network of friends in my rural retreat count?
Does spending years developing alternate, survival income streams count?
“Any concrete examples of your own behavior to share or is just something you encourage others to do on your behalf?”
I think you need to reread the quote, focus on “a people unwilling”. It does not say you should shoot any tyrants, but the willingness to do so.
Besides you will know if and when to start shooting if it should come to that.
I think you need to reread the quote, focus on “a people unwilling”. It does not say you should shoot any tyrants, but the willingness to do so.
Besides you will know if and when to start shooting if it should come to that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.