Suing a sitting President for defamation has been done before.
I’m sorry but I’m not commenting on someone with an ongoing investigation...
I’m sorry but I’m not commenting on someone with an ongoing trial...
I’m sorry but I’m not commenting on someone with an ongoing life...
I’m sorry but I will not comment on behalf of the deceased...
Zhou Xiden is upset that Rittenhouse shot one of his fellow pedophiles.
I hope Kyle’s mom doesn’t commit arkancide.
...They could have walked it back, even could have maybe tried to spin Biden’s tweet as not about Rittenhouse per se (which still would have been a lie), but instead, they give the “no comment on an ongoing trial” default answer
Walking it back was never an option. Dems don't play that. When Obama criticized a cop for 'acting stupidly' (back when criticizing cops was considered politically risky) he never walked it back when the criticism came. He held a 'beer summit' and then pretended it never happened. Biden lacks Obama's ability to twist a narrative to his favor, instead he just lies. It served him well as a Senator for 40ish years.
bkmk for further study.
Charlottesville was a false flag political play staged by McAwful to paint anyone defending American history as a racist.
Psucki does nothing to defend Potato Head and makes a comment she can be sued for. LOL
“Vigilantes patrolling our communities with assault rifles” is the result of illegal orders given by Mayors and Police Chiefs to prevent their police force from protecting lives and properties.
Lawsuit time.