Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dave Rubin Goes All-In for Convention of States (Blaze TV)
Convention of States Action ^ | November 12th 2021 | Mark Meckler

Posted on 11/13/2021 10:19:43 AM PST by Jacquerie

From Ben Shapiro to Mark Levin to Sean Hannity, the Convention of States Project has been endorsed by some of the most trusted names in American politics and media.

Today, Dave Rubin added his name to that impressive list.

The libertarian political commentator and host of the super-popular BlazeTV show, The Rubin Report, gave his official endorsement of the Convention of States Project over the weekend.

Here's what he had to say:

“Our political system is definitely broken, and it needs more than elections to fix it. We need to restore the structure of our system of governance. That’s why I endorse the Convention of States Project, led by my friend Mark Meckler. For people like me who think we need to do more than complain, Article V of the Constitution gives us a way to call a convention, propose amendments and shove the federal government back in the constitutional box. That’s my kind of solution.”

Dave will be elaborating on his support for the Convention of States Project during his show over the next few weeks, so be sure to tune in!

Legislative Update:

North Carolina - We're within a few votes of what we need to pass the Senate, which would make North Carolina state #16. We're doing everything we can to lock in those last few votes, including offering holdouts an opportunity to speak with experts like Sen. Rick Santorum and Prof. Rob Natelson.

Wisconsin - This is most likely to be the first state to pass the Convention of States Resolution in 2022! Our team believes we now have the votes needed to pass in the Senate, which would mean final passage for Wisconsin.

Pennsylvania - Our team made major progress this year when the Senate State Government Committee gave our national experts a rare opportunity to face off against Article V opponents in a special committee meeting without the procedural constraints of a formal hearing. It didn't take long for it to become clear that while we base our arguments on fact, history, and law, opposition is based entirely on fear, speculation, and misconceptions.

West Virginia - We expect early movement in the Mountaineer State now that we've received indications that House leadership wants to make COS a priority for 2022.

Nebraska - At the end of the 2021 session, our champion legislators pulled off a rare procedural move to suspend the Senate Rules and place our Resolution on General File, thus ensuring that it will be ready for a floor vote when the Senate convenes in January, 2022. With session scheduled from January 5-March 5, Nebraska's unicameral legislature should be another early mover! As you can see, we’re on the cusp of passage in many states, but we can’t do it without the support of patriots like you.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: articlev; cos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Convention of States.
1 posted on 11/13/2021 10:19:43 AM PST by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 5thGenTexan; 1010RD; AllAmericanGirl44; Amagi; aragorn; Art in Idaho; Arthur McGowan; ...

Article V ping!


2 posted on 11/13/2021 10:20:08 AM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
Article V of the Constitution gives us a way to call a convention, propose amendments and shove the federal government back in the constitutional box.

Call a convention? Check.
Propose amendments? Check.
Shove the federal government back in the constitutional box? Why would anyone believe this is what a constitutional convention would achieve? I think it's far more likely that well-organized and well-funded leftists would use the opportunity to simply destroy the Bill of Rights.
3 posted on 11/13/2021 10:25:01 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

If there was a possible amendment with enough support to be ratified by 38 states, wouldn’t it likely be proposed by Congress first?


4 posted on 11/13/2021 10:25:31 AM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

Congress will never diminish its powers.

That’s why George Mason, at the end of the federal convention, reintroduced the state-derived applications method.


5 posted on 11/13/2021 10:27:51 AM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight
They'd do us all a favor by repealing the 17th Amendment and ratifying Article the First.
6 posted on 11/13/2021 10:30:10 AM PST by rarestia (“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.” -Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

<>think it’s far more likely that well-organized and well-funded leftists would use the opportunity to simply destroy the Bill of Rights.<>

Do your equate delegates to a Convention of States with members of Congress? If so, that is an error. The states will send delegates with commissions that frame their authority.


7 posted on 11/13/2021 10:30:41 AM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Nice idea...but why would the Democrats follow an amended Constitution when they won’t follow our present one?


8 posted on 11/13/2021 10:31:21 AM PST by BobL (I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's, I just don't tell anyone, like most here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Do your equate delegates to a Convention of States with members of Congress? If so, that is an error. The states will send delegates with commissions that frame their authority.


That should not inspire confidence after the role that GOP controlled states played in the stolen election of 2020.


9 posted on 11/13/2021 10:32:28 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

All good things are possible with repeal of the 17th and impossible without.

Yes, and congressional districts should be downsized.


10 posted on 11/13/2021 10:33:30 AM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

Fine. Just keep voting. But doing so reminds me of the common definition of insanity.


11 posted on 11/13/2021 10:35:16 AM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Better late, than never, right?


12 posted on 11/13/2021 10:36:52 AM PST by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

Absolutely! With Marxists in charge of government and Republicans assisting, this would be a mammoth disaster!


13 posted on 11/13/2021 10:39:11 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
I think it's far more likely that well-organized and well-funded leftists would use the opportunity to simply destroy the Bill of Rights.

Then I don't think you understand how a convention of states works. Any amendments proposed by the convention would still need to be ratified by 3/4 of the states. Unless you think there are 38 state legislatures that are prepared to repeal the Bill of Rights, I think your concerns are misplaced.

I think the greater concern is that we would have a difficult time getting ANY proposed amendments ratified. But I don't think that is an excuse to not try.

14 posted on 11/13/2021 10:39:51 AM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

Congress has already proposed “Article the First,” so there is nothing for Congress or an Article V convention to do there. You just need another 27 states to ratify it.


15 posted on 11/13/2021 10:41:33 AM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight
If there was a possible amendment with enough support to be ratified by 38 states, wouldn’t it likely be proposed by Congress first?

Not necessarily. Congress has different priorities than the states. Congress tends to pass things that enhance the power of the federal government, while states tend to prefer things that restrain the power of the federal government.

16 posted on 11/13/2021 10:41:50 AM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

BINGO!

And when that happens, the shooting war starts.


17 posted on 11/13/2021 10:42:54 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
Do your equate delegates to a Convention of States with members of Congress? If so, that is an error. The states will send delegates with commissions that frame their authority.

Those delegates will be subject to the same lobbying and pressure that members of Congress are subject to now. And I don't trust even Republican legislatures to appoint sufficiently conservative delegates. The First and Second Amendments are already under siege by both the Left and RINOs in state legislatures. What would prevent an unrestricted convention from making wholesale changes to both?

An unrestricted constitutional convention with no limits on its scope opens a Pandora's box, with no assurance that we will be happy with the results. We could end up with something even worse than we have now - given the amount of money the Left now has, the support it has from BigTech and the MSM, and the proven effectiveness of these groups in corrupting the 2020 election, conservatives should be very wary of giving such an opportunity to the Left.
18 posted on 11/13/2021 10:45:20 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Yes. Considering the growth of authoritarian power and oppression these past ten months, it is silly to think Congress will limit itself or the high criminals that occupy the highest federal offices.


19 posted on 11/13/2021 10:45:35 AM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
I think the greater concern is that we would have a difficult time getting ANY proposed amendments ratified.

The amendments that conservatives don't like are the ones that will get concerted, organized backing, funding, lobbying and massive media support from BigTech, the MSM, and the rest of the Left machine which successfully corrupted the 2020 presidential and congressional elections. That's what concerns me.
20 posted on 11/13/2021 10:48:01 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson