“… the most powerful presentations was given by Dr. Linda Wastila, who is a PhD professor …”
**************************************************
Hmmm… “Doctor” Linda and “Doctor” Jill could open up a practice together.
Ping!
Bkmk
“We”?
I guess if the question used “They”, instead of “We” the questioner/s would be labeled as Domestic Terrorists.
Because the Myocarditis from Covid-19 is worse than the vaccines, and they have no alternative. Unless they admit that Ivermectin and HCQ + Zinc is effective. And if they do that, then they broke the law regarding emergency use vaccines.
They should have Investigated the alternatives fairly and simultaneously asked for a legislative solution to allow emergency use for Covid vaccines despite Ivermectin and HCQ. But they were either too lazy or too scared to go that route. And if those actually work, they were criminally negligent in doing so.
The Scandinavians have stopped using the Moderna vaccine in young and adolescent males. Too few serious cases of COVID in this age group and too much myocarditis. Here the CDC advocates mass vaccination in young, not very susceptible people not for their necessary protection but because they think, but have no absolute confirmatory data, that the administration of the vaccine will make them less likely to be carriers and transmitters. The use of these mRNA vaccines in children on a massive scale is a venture into the unknown. Saying that you are sure it is “safe” is only an opinion.
I watched a youtube video by Dr. Mobeen yesterday about a Swedish study that claimed that in vitro experiments demonstrate that the spike proteins can enter the nucleus and impair DNA repair. The mechanism for doing so is unlikely though, but it’s a concern.
They were speculating that they needed to break up the spike protein in the vaccines to have safer vaccines.
Seriously, in phase 3 testing is where they get a better, broader idea of the potential side effects of a treatment. What we're learning, barely, because they don't want to admit it, is that these vaccines are fairly risky affairs.
Researchers with any integrity would be, should be looking for common factors to build up a database of what conditions make the vaccines more risky. Then people with these conditions or medical histories would be warned away - "contraindicated" is the med-speak.
Right now, no-one is contraindicated for the vax. My doctor told me exactly that. Exactly. Oh sure, there are the weasel words "Anyone allergic to the components of the vax should not take it." Great, what are the components, and how would I know if I'm allergic since I've never had an mRNA vaccine before? Idiots.
The acolytes are preaching that everyone, even children, should get them - with no idea how dangerous they are. None. Tell me what the 5 year effects are on a 5 year old - you can't. No-one can. Yet they want to vaccinate millions with no idea what will happen. The only thing they can say with reasonable confidence is that probably no-one drops dead the moment they get the shot. Beyond that, nearly everything is a guess, a hope, and a prayer. That is not what we should be basing medical policy or decisions on.
This is gross misuse of the VAERS report. How many of these cases were victims of the coxsackie virus? Fact: Thee are over 10,000 coxsackie cases each year in the U.S.
At this late date, the answer is clear as to why we are accepting these deadly side effects. It is intentional.
“ Why are we Accepting Myocarditis as an Acceptable Side Effect for COVID Vaccines?”
…the Soviets called it “Social Hygiene”.
“Why” you ask? Because that’s what it’s designed to do. That’s why.
The deaths from the vaccine probably are as many who have reported to have died from the virus. The number of adverse reactions probably run into the millions.
Yet these vaccines are still being pushed instead of pulled.
The big question is why? Is our government really willing to let people be affected by these vaccines to their own detriment?