Posted on 11/07/2021 7:51:53 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
November 07, 2021
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Our most-read article last week, by far, was the article on Senator Ron Johnson’s Roundtable discussion held in Washington D.C. where doctors, scientists, and COVID-19 vaccine injured victims met to discuss COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
The entire recording of this event is over 3.5 hours long, and so I have been watching it and breaking up the speakers into individual videos to make it easier to watch this truly historical event that happened at our nation’s capital last week.
10 of these powerful presentations were published with that article last week, and you can watch them here:
One of the most powerful presentations was given by Dr. Linda Wastila, who is a PhD professor and heads the Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research at the University of Maryland. (Source.)
In her initial presentation, which we published last week, Dr. Wastila stated:
We are citizens who have done our civic duty, but when we suffer serious adverse effects, we’re left high and dry by the FDA, the CDC, the NIH and medical professionals.
We are scientists alarmed by the toxic environment in academia and scientific publishing.
We are military leaders concerned about vaccine safety in the armed services.
We are clinicians who want to treat patients harmed by the vaccines but whose practices are limited by our employers and professional boards.
And we are lawyers and patient advocates seeking help for our injured clients and their families.
We are the people you haven’t heard from.
And we have nothing, absolutely nothing to personally gain from being here. Indeed, we have everything to lose, including our jobs, our titles, our livelihoods.
But we don’t intend to go away until we see some real change.
Dr. Wastila later in the meeting gave another presentation about VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and the “science of vaccine safety.”
Dr. Wastila is very critical of the CDC for using sound bytes with the public and stating that COVID-19 vaccines are “safe.”
The statement that everyone by now has heard come out of the mouth of CDC Director Rochelle Walensky many times, and which is fraudulently printed on the CDC website, is:
Millions of people in the United States have received COVID-19 vaccines under the most intense safety monitoring in U.S. history.
Dr. Wastila states:
The impression is the system is so finely tuned that even the rarest needle in the haystack will be found.
I am afraid that is just not the case.
Now remember, the reason Senator Johnson invited Dr. Wastila is because drugs and drug safety is her area of expertise.
She states that the process to determine if there are problems that need to be addressed based on reported side effects in VAERS is a very slow process, and she uses myocarditis as an example.
It took four months into Israel’s national vaccine campaign to recognize this side effect. That’s besides the fact that myocarditis generally strikes within days of dosing, particularly the second dose.
So officials were experiencing this side effect for months before officials recognized the vaccine as the cause.
This delay in detecting, researching, and acknowledging side effects is normal.
And it is devastating.
The patients at this meeting today know that devastation first hand.
But it’s also devastating because unless you first recognize harms soon after they occur, you can’t use that knowledge in the next person about to get the vaccine.
I am stunned when I hear people dismiss myocarditis as an acceptable side effect, especially for young people.
Because myocarditis is life-threatening, and a life-disabling condition.
As I reported last week, the CDC admits that myocarditis is caused by COVID-19 vaccines, but they dismiss it as “rare.”
This is what is currently published on the CDC website:
Myocarditis and pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination are rare. As of October 27, 2021, VAERS has received 1,784 reports of myocarditis or pericarditis among people ages 30 and younger who received COVID-19 vaccine. Most cases have been reported after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), particularly in male adolescents and young adults. Through follow-up, including medical record reviews, CDC and FDA have confirmed 1,005 reports of myocarditis or pericarditis. CDC and its partners are investigating these reports to assess whether there is a relationship to COVID-19 vaccination.
Why are we continuing to inject children with these shots? Under what possible logic or ethics is 1,784 reports of myocarditis or pericarditis among people under the age of 30 acceptable?
There are far more reports of myocarditis or pericarditis following COVID-19 shots than following ALL vaccines for the past 30+ years recorded in VAERS.
And we know this is only a fraction of the actual cases because VAERS is under-reported, and many of these cases have already led to deaths.
The CDC and FDA have never conducted a study to determine what this under-reported factor is, but independent scientists have, and we have previously published the analysis conducted by Dr. Jessica Rose, who has determined that a conservative under-reported factor would be X41.
That would put the truer picture of young people suffering from myocarditis closer to 74,928 cases, and now they have just begun to inject 5 to 11 year olds.
“… the most powerful presentations was given by Dr. Linda Wastila, who is a PhD professor …”
**************************************************
Hmmm… “Doctor” Linda and “Doctor” Jill could open up a practice together.
Hmmmm....why did you leave off the rest?
PhD professor and heads the Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research at the University of Maryland.
Ping!
Doing your drive by drivel, nothing to add to the topic, thread stalking again, we see.
Bkmk
” . . . who is a PhD professor and heads the Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research at the University of Maryland”
Chances are that she knows a lot more about this stuff than you or I.
Yeah....too bad Sen Ron Johnson didn’t ask HA....ha ha ha....to be on this panel of actual docs/scientists....to offer his drive by attacks.
🙄
“We”?
I guess if the question used “They”, instead of “We” the questioner/s would be labeled as Domestic Terrorists.
Because the idiot vax shills are getting more and more obvious. Or maybe "frightened" explains it better.
Because the Myocarditis from Covid-19 is worse than the vaccines, and they have no alternative. Unless they admit that Ivermectin and HCQ + Zinc is effective. And if they do that, then they broke the law regarding emergency use vaccines.
They should have Investigated the alternatives fairly and simultaneously asked for a legislative solution to allow emergency use for Covid vaccines despite Ivermectin and HCQ. But they were either too lazy or too scared to go that route. And if those actually work, they were criminally negligent in doing so.
The Scandinavians have stopped using the Moderna vaccine in young and adolescent males. Too few serious cases of COVID in this age group and too much myocarditis. Here the CDC advocates mass vaccination in young, not very susceptible people not for their necessary protection but because they think, but have no absolute confirmatory data, that the administration of the vaccine will make them less likely to be carriers and transmitters. The use of these mRNA vaccines in children on a massive scale is a venture into the unknown. Saying that you are sure it is “safe” is only an opinion.
I watched a youtube video by Dr. Mobeen yesterday about a Swedish study that claimed that in vitro experiments demonstrate that the spike proteins can enter the nucleus and impair DNA repair. The mechanism for doing so is unlikely though, but it’s a concern.
They were speculating that they needed to break up the spike protein in the vaccines to have safer vaccines.
And “Doctor” House could teach them how to weave Appeal to Ridicule logical fallacies into their presentations.
Seriously, in phase 3 testing is where they get a better, broader idea of the potential side effects of a treatment. What we're learning, barely, because they don't want to admit it, is that these vaccines are fairly risky affairs.
Researchers with any integrity would be, should be looking for common factors to build up a database of what conditions make the vaccines more risky. Then people with these conditions or medical histories would be warned away - "contraindicated" is the med-speak.
Right now, no-one is contraindicated for the vax. My doctor told me exactly that. Exactly. Oh sure, there are the weasel words "Anyone allergic to the components of the vax should not take it." Great, what are the components, and how would I know if I'm allergic since I've never had an mRNA vaccine before? Idiots.
The acolytes are preaching that everyone, even children, should get them - with no idea how dangerous they are. None. Tell me what the 5 year effects are on a 5 year old - you can't. No-one can. Yet they want to vaccinate millions with no idea what will happen. The only thing they can say with reasonable confidence is that probably no-one drops dead the moment they get the shot. Beyond that, nearly everything is a guess, a hope, and a prayer. That is not what we should be basing medical policy or decisions on.
That is right. They want to vaccinate all children not to protect them but to possibly protect adults. The majority of whom are already vaccinated.
That is a violation of any rational view of medical ethics that borders on evil.
Children may not get very sick from Covid, but they can transmit it to other people when infected.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.