Posted on 11/02/2021 4:27:26 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen
Eleven months after the 2020 American presidential election, the official results remain so incongruous, they merit an empirical exegesis.
The political establishment’s narrative is that Biden won an unexpectedly close race, and the outcome requires no further examination. Yet, Biden’s victory is so statistically suspicious, so riddled with ahistorical outcomes, that a detailed data examination is necessary to reassure Americans the official result was, in fact, the actual result.
(Excerpt) Read more at chroniclesmagazine.org ...
Empirical evidence and historical data leads to an inescapable conclusion about the 2020 election. Here are nine categories of suspicious anomalies in Biden’s victory.
It's not difficult to steal a state's EVs when it would have been close even without cheating. And mail in balloting made it 10 times easier.
And with the recent SCOTUS decision and now that mail in balloting is basically nationwide...and permanent...we'll see no more honest elections.
BFL
Thanks for posting. I too had heard similar stuff from various sources, but this summarized it all. Saved for future reference.
bookmark
That a handful of swing State’s (specifically) that were losing to Trump, and ONLY those State’s, suddenly ‘stopped’ counting and then magically had Biden up when counting ‘resumed’ is beyond magical.
The Enthusiasm Gap is a reliable predictor of presidential election outcomes........that is to say the enthusiasm gap between the candidates’ supporters. The more enthusiastic a supporter, the more likely he or she is to vote, volunteer, or donate. Trump benefitted greatly from this advantage in 2016.
2020 Trump drew thousands of attentive voters from sea to shining sea.
By contrast, there were several venues where NOBODY showed up for Biden/Harris.......
not even a single party regular, or an elected Democrat.
To this day, neither these two Dems are able to draw meaningful crowds.
^*
The lying democrats change the goal posts. It went form
“ZERO evidence of fraud” to “Some fraud but not enough to change” to “SHAM AUDIT” to “NO evidence of massive fraud” to “THAT’S RACIST”
The democrats didn’t HAVE to commit massive vote fraud. They targeted exactly where they needed to have the fraudulent ballots to tip the scales by just a few votes. And regardless of how much they did cheat every vote in the states that changed election rules through judicial and bureaucratic fiat was an invalid vote. Trump won and the democrats cheated. It is not debatable.
Thank you for posting this. This is a great summary of observations, any one of which should have been enough to provoke high suspicion.
"A synthesis of the empirical evidence, innumerable anomalies, and predictive metrics leads to an inescapable conclusion about the 2020 presidential election. Although it is statistically possible that Biden won, clearly it is statistically implausible that he actually did. As Biden, himself, stated in a summer speech in Philadelphia, “It’s no longer just about who gets to vote…. It’s about who gets to count the vote.”
FJB
A most excellent read. Thanks for posting.
bookmark
That was Bidet attributing Stalin’s statement to himself (as usual).
Btt.
VIII. Presidential Coattails
Presidential elections influence the partisan composition of the House of Representatives in favor of the winning candidate’s party. Winning candidates, especially challengers, carry down-ballot congressional candidates over the finish line. Similarly, down-ballot voting is a reliable indicator of success for the top of the ticket.
Some examples: In 1980, Reagan’s victory saw Republicans gain a net 34 House seats; in 1984, Reagan’s reelection saw a net Republican gain of 16 House seats; in 2008, Obama’s win saw his Democrats gain a net of nine House seats; and, in 2016, Trump’s narrow victory saw his party gain House seats while winning all the toss-up races.
In 2020, Biden apparently won the national popular vote by several million votes, yet congressional Republicans flipped 13 Democratic seats, did not lose a single Republican-held seat, and won all 27 toss-up contests. Furthermore, Trump’s party did not lose a single state legislature and made gains at the state level.
It is extremely rare for this to happen. In 82 percent of the elections since 1932, the party of the candidate who wins the national popular votes gains seats in the House.
This one section of the article is very meaningful to me. I expect that the Dems will continue to bleed out at the state and local level, until their county count is below 500 counties in 2024.
Of course the Dems will still probably win the presidency per the media ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.