Please Support FR
Click The Pic To Donate.
Advice: ask your local vaccination provider how they like Benjamin Franklin, and that you would rather not be vaccinated but you need it for your job. If they balk, say you changed your mind, rinse and repeat until you are happy.
My 2 cents.
A police officer should know better. Fake Cards are being looked for and closely scrutinized, especially if you are known to have been anti-vax up till now.
Everyone is getting fired or suspended all except the domestic enemy occupier in the Oval office who is doing more damage to this nation than Al Qaeda or the Taliban could ever hope to do.
Interesting, Lapp is an Amish surname.
I have no problem with anyone lying to tyrants.
In fact, I think it’s moral.
Any response about a job offer in Florida, better pay, bonus pay, better weather,lower taxes?
When the law protects the criminals the good will break the law.
Please Support FR
Click The Pic To Donate.
Exactly what crime did they commit? If it's on the books, I've never heard of it.
They should identify as illegal aliens.
-just like having a fraudulent Vice President who is not eligible for the office because she's NOT a natural born citizen since her parents were not U.S. citizens when she was born.
apparently the cards are blanks issued by the CDC until filled out by someone.
if there is no statute about it, no law was broken.
i can not find a statute. what statute was broken?
so when are they going to prosecute fauci cdc fda etc for conspiracy to defraud the United States? they are getting paid for honest work not lies.
The word “defraud” in Section 371 not only reaches financial or property loss through use of a scheme or artifice to defraud but also is designed and intended to PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE UNITED STATES AND ITS AGENCIES,PROGRAMS AND POLICIES. United States v. Burgin, 621 F.2d 1352, 1356 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1015 (1980); see United States v. Herron, 825 F.2d 50, 57-58 (5th Cir.); United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 708 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 (1979). Thus, proof that the United States has been defrauded under this statute does not require any showing of monetary or proprietary loss. United States v. Conover, 772 F.2d 765 (11th Cir. 1985), aff’d, sub. nom. Tanner v. United States, 483 U.S. 107 (1987); United States v. Del Toro, 513 F.2d 656 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 826 (1975); United States v. Jacobs, 475 F.2d 270 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 821 (1973).
Thus, if the defendant and others have engaged in dishonest practices in connection with a program administered by an agency of the Government, it constitutes a fraud on the United States under Section 371. United States v. Gallup, 812 F.2d 1271, 1276 (10th Cir. 1987); Conover, 772 F.2d at 771. In United States v. Hopkins, 916 F.2d 207 (5th Cir. 1990), the defendants’ actions in disguising contributions were designed to evade the Federal Election Commission’s reporting requirements and constituted fraud on the agency under Section 371.
The intent required for a conspiracy to defraud the government is that the defendant possessed the intent (a) to defraud, (b) to make false statements or representations to the government or its agencies in order to obtain property of the government, or that the defendant performed acts or made statements that he/she knew to be false, fraudulent or deceitful to a government agency, which disrupted the functions of the agency or of the government. It is sufficient for the government to prove that the defendant knew the statements were false or fraudulent when made. The government is not required to prove the statements ultimately resulted in any actual loss to the government of any property or funds, only that the defendant’s activities impeded or interfered with legitimate governmental functions. See United States v. Puerto, 730 F.2d 627 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 847 (1984); United States v. Tuohey, 867 F.2d 534 (9th Cir. 1989); United States v. Sprecher, 783 F. Supp. 133, 156 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)(þit is sufficient that the defendant engaged in acts that interfered with or obstructed a lawful governmental function by deceit, craft, trickery or by means that were dishonest”), modified on other grounds, 988 F.2d 318 (2d Cir. 1993).
https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-923-18-usc-371-conspiracy-defraud-us
“were terminated...” Unethical. Using the stupid covid virus as an excuse to boss people around is just plain wrong.
Ping.
Sucks to be them. Glad they got canned for lying.
Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
The demented pedophile does not have legislative authority over the states with regards to vaccine mandates, particularly for an experimental gene therapy that cannot be classified as such. As well as the fact that the one being administered for emergency use is not FDA approved. Wake up, you imbeciles on this thread.
They could have refused the jab like many others have done and found other work. That can be respected. But if they’re willing to deliberately lie and falsify their own records for their personal benefit that casts on any arrests they’ve made or will make. Not who we need working in a public trust position.