Posted on 10/11/2021 2:49:24 AM PDT by Kaslin
Way back when, in the very beginning of Pandemic Time, March of 2020, I found an article that described a think-tank exercise determining how we might respond to a pandemic. It played out four response scenarios, with outcomes for each, from shutting down the economy, as we did, to doing nothing, emphasizing what each scenario would do to the world’s economy. I vaguely remember it being undertaken in either 2009 or 2014.
I wish I could find this article, but it’s either been taken down or buried so deep it might as well have been. My bookmark disappeared.
I remember, though, that from the pandemic’s beginning, our response has mimicked the exercise’s worst-results scenario, to an inordinately great extent. The one they concluded was flawed, impractical, and would cause worldwide catastrophe.
I’ve been a pandemic skeptic from the start. When my little town had signs posted on every block that said “Danger! Stay home!” and they’d closed all the gyms, I hiked 5 miles a day outdoors, pretty much every day, until my bad foot (I’d had Achilles surgery) let me know I was overdoing it. I stopped here and there on street-side benches that weren’t covered in yellow tape, and I wrote for a while on my phone—I ended up writing a personalized book for each of our four young grandkids’ birthdays, as a way to stay sane. Along with the books, I started writing articles, published here.
When they yellow-taped the parks and the beaches, I railed against the stupidity of it. People told me I was nuts to say that sunlight was the best disinfectant, that there was no danger being outside. I also said that masks were of no practical use, that they caused more problems and psychological harm than they did stop the virus,
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Yes, to both.
Gee, a person with common sense.
How refreshing Terry Paulding is.
As much as we have been lied to it is not a crazy thought to think that those in power didn’t have the actual jab but have been dosing themselves with Ivermectin.
The author misses the obvious conclusion: it was part of a plot to steal America itself. The nursing home deaths were deliberate, to increase the casualties real and faked to run up the panic.
The panic was used to push mail in voting. I use to wonder why Hillary lost her fixed election. She could not cheat enough with their normal techniques. With the votes done by mail FJB was able to cheat enough to win.
I forget to add the purpose of all the riots: to intimidate the Court of Supreme Whim from acting after the election was stolen.
My Theory also explains why the Left is resistant to the real cures and solutions. They need to steal another election since they have failed to seal the steal because of two flaky RAT senators.
Bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.