Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Widespread Ivermectin Use Has Caused a 97% Drop in Coronavirus Cases in Delhi, India
Based Underground ^ | September 29, 2021 | Arsenio Toledo

Posted on 09/29/2021 8:39:02 AM PDT by SoConPubbie

Around 97 percent of Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) cases in the Delhi metropolitan area in India have been effectively dealt with thanks to the widespread use of ivermectin.

Earlier in the year, India dealt with a devastating post-vaccine wave of the coronavirus. This post-vaccine outbreak affected the country differently. In states that did not use ivermectin, cases soared. But the data shows that by the end of May, this second wave of COVID-19 was under control in parts of the country that treated patients with ivermectin. (Related: Indian state with 240 million people completely eradicated covid with ivermectin.)

In Delhi, health authorities began treating patients with ivermectin on April 20. At the time, the metropolitan area of 30 million people was dealing with nearly 30,000 new cases daily.

By the end of May, COVID-19 cases in the metro area were down to less than 1,000 new cases per day. This is a 97 percent reduction in new COVID-19 cases in just five weeks.

The number of deaths per day also fell from nearly 300 in April to slightly above 100 by the end of May.

Similarly, momentous drops in COVID-19 cases could also be seen in at least four other Indian states that used ivermectin for its COVID-19 patients.

Of particular note is the northern state of Uttar Pradesh, where health authorities went from dealing with nearly 40,000 new COVID-19 cases per day in late April to just 2,000 new cases per day by the end of May. This is a 95 percent reduction in new cases.

Meanwhile, in states that did not use ivermectin, the number of new COVID-19 cases they were dealing with kept on growing.

The southern state of Tamil Nadu dealt with nearly 11,000 new COVID-19 cases per day by late April. By the end of May, that number had ballooned to over 30,000 new COVID-19 cases daily.

Daily deaths due to COVID-19 in Tamil Nadu also rose from 48 on April 20 to 474 on May 27.

Ivermectin is still being attacked all over the world

In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration still has not approved ivermectin for treating or preventing COVID-19.

Instead of adopting the use of this cheap and effective drug, advocates of the experimental and deadly vaccines have ridiculed ivermectin as a “horse deworming” medication. Those who ridicule ivermectin like this fail to understand that there are two kinds of ivermectin, one for use for animals such as horses and another for humans.

Two of the three winners of the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2015 won the award for their discovery of ivermectin and its use in treating malaria. This is the version of ivermectin that humans can take and is being used to treat COVID-19.

Even in India, where the use of ivermectin has saved potentially millions of lives, the medicine is still being attacked by health authorities. The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), the government’s main biomedical research body, has discontinued the use of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for the management of adult COVID-19 cases.

Instead of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, the ICMR is instead recommending that COVID-19 patients be given remdesivir and tocilizumab, the former of which is known to be more harmful than useful against COVID-19.

Dr. Justin R. Hope, writing for The Desert Review, argues that if the world had listened to the experts who were advocating for the use of ivermectin, thousands of lives could have been saved both in India and in the United States.

“Delhi did it right. The United States and Tamil Nadu did it wrong,” he wrote. “It cost half a million precious lives and horrific pain and suffering for the world. The pandemic was prolonged for no good reason.”

“Now, we are in a different position,” he continues. “We as a people have absolute evidence of ivermectin’s efficacy. In Delhi, we heard not one single story of ivermectin being toxic or causing any difficulty. On the contrary, it is safe, and it saved tens of thousands from COVID.”

Learn more about how governments all over the world are trying to prevent COVID-19 patients from being treated with actually useful medications like ivermectin by reading the latest articles at Pandemic.news.

Sources include:



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: covid19; covid1984; delhi; delusion; fakenews; india; itdoesntwork; ivermectin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: SoConPubbie

The virus would be gone in 6 weeks if they allowed Ivermectin in America.


21 posted on 09/29/2021 9:52:22 AM PDT by bray (Our patience is wearing thin Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

They never did vaccinate, could not get it or afford it. They take IVM once a week with zinc and stopped it cold.


22 posted on 09/29/2021 9:53:42 AM PDT by bray (Our patience is wearing thin Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Those Indian states can perform clinical trials.

And what does peer reviewed clinical trials mean? I do not think you understand what a clinical trial is.

Russia could do trials. They haven’t. There’s no agenda there. Damn near any country could do them. They don’t care about US politics.

India saw a decline in cases. There is no evidence Ivermectin had anything to do with it. The US has had rises and then declines in cases and Ivermectin has not been demonstrated to be involved in those declines, either. Peru had Lambda arrive and had a huge peak, and decline, and there’s no evidence Ivermectin was involve.

Look, just get the pure data. If you don’t have pure data you have nothing at all. As best I know there have been no clinical trials of Coca Cola vs Covid. So we can’t conclude Coca Cola has any impact on Covid. There is no difference with Ivermectin.

No trials? Then you have nothing.


23 posted on 09/29/2021 9:54:07 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hawkaw

google and... USAtoday?(a gannett canadian owned Publication?)

And you wanna talk about “cultish” behaviors?

Yeah sure you get the truth sometimes...sometimes you learn more truth about uncomfortable subjects the so-called “experts” are working very hard to lead us away from.


24 posted on 09/29/2021 9:59:53 AM PDT by mdmathis6 (Having the Conch shell is no longer recognized by Dem "Flies" as giving one authority to speak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Owen
There is no evidence Ivermectin had anything to do with it. The US has had rises and then declines in cases and Ivermectin has not been demonstrated to be involved in those declines, either. Peru had Lambda arrive and had a huge peak, and decline, and there’s no evidence Ivermectin was involve.

So the only two actions that these two states take are:
  1. Stop vaccinations
  2. Provide universal access and mandate protocals to Ivermection
Once those two actions were taken, their cases literally dropped to the floor and deaths disappeared.

but that is not evidence in your book?
25 posted on 09/29/2021 10:01:22 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Which will be fought against by many governments, including our own. COVID has provided the ‘emergency’ that authorized their increased powers and no way are they going to all them to be repealed. COVID MUST continue.


26 posted on 09/29/2021 10:12:41 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

The True Believers syndrome....


27 posted on 09/29/2021 10:21:51 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Owen

There are PLENTY of peer-reviewed, RCT trials of ivermectin.

ivmmeta.com


28 posted on 09/29/2021 10:24:58 AM PDT by LilFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Here’s some clinical trials;

Pfizer; Completion date May 2nd 2023
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04368728

Moderna: Completion date Oct 27th 2022
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04470427


29 posted on 09/29/2021 10:31:30 AM PDT by Pollard (Some people like to argue just to argue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chopperk

“When will the CDC and FDA release this Ivermectin for American use and stop this nonsense Pandemic????”

Only when Fauci and top level management are kicked out of control.


30 posted on 09/29/2021 10:32:29 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Some people could be hit by a car and say there’s no evidence of vehicular traffic.


31 posted on 09/29/2021 10:34:38 AM PDT by Pollard (Some people like to argue just to argue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Pollard

Exactly.

The idea that there is no evidence is a complete and utter fabrication and lie.


32 posted on 09/29/2021 10:39:15 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

The discussion is not about vax.

It’s about the absence of clinical trials for Ivermectin. It is strictly about the absence of clinical trials for Ivermectin.

There are no trials for Coca Cola vs Covid. There are no trials of Aspirin vs Covid. There are no trials of Vicks Vaporub vs Covid.

If you have no trials you have nothing. Don’t pretend you have something when you have nothing.

Trials are 3 phases. Phase I examines the tested item for toxicity. Does it do any harm. Phase II examines the tested item for actual positive results at a dose level equal to what was used in Phase I. How positive does not matter. There simply must be positive results after a double blind trial.

And Phase III compares the magnitude of positive results, if there are any, to the results obtained by the currently in place standard treatment. If the results are inferior, it fails. If the results are superior, it becomes the new currently in place standard treatment.

I don’t know why “peer reviewed” is mentioned in association with this because it’s not relevant. Peer review is something done to scientific article submission. Not clinical trials.

You must have successful trials or you have nothing. You are Coca Cola or Aspirin or Vicks VapoRub. You have the same evidence they have . . . none.


33 posted on 09/29/2021 11:16:24 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bray

The virus would be gone in 6 weeks if they allowed Ivermectin in America.
.......................................................
Vaccinated people are being reinfected with the virus and many are being maimed and/or dying from the vaccines. I’m personally related to or acquainted with a half dozen such victims. Meanwhile many people who are not vaccinated are using Ivermectin and/or Hydroxychloroquine with phenomenal results. I will continue to decline the vaccine and await my order of the aforementioned medications, thank you!


34 posted on 09/29/2021 12:17:39 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Stop with the bullshit. If you have no clinical trials, you have nothing. You want something? Get clinical trials.
...............................................
You mean something like this:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3999095/posts


35 posted on 09/29/2021 12:28:00 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Owen

There are 67 clinical trials of Ivermectin with an average cure rate of 66%. Look it up.


36 posted on 09/29/2021 12:36:47 PM PDT by bray (Our patience is wearing thin Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Here is some results:
https://c19early.com/

This disease would be over if it was over the counter like aspirin.


37 posted on 09/29/2021 12:40:04 PM PDT by bray (Our patience is wearing thin Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Owen
If you have no trials you have nothing. Don’t pretend you have something when you have nothing.

The requirement to depend solely on trials for your OK, when you have ample, real-life evidence that Ivermectin works is telling.

In addition to the real-life evidence that India has provided that Ivermectin works, you also have a myriad of Doctors that have focused solely on protocols who primary ingrediant is Ivermectin. With all of these Doctor's practices, their success rate defined by recovery from COVID-19, lack of deaths, and lack of serious injuries is amazing. But you would have us ignore that, or worse, lie about it stating it is not proof.

BTW, those trials you speak of, who is doing the trials, and how long do they take?

I ask, because if BIG-Pharma is involved in any way, they cannot be trusted.

And why not use something in the near-term, while we wait for your trials to be completed, if ever, unless of course, you believe that everyone who is proclaiming that their experience with Ivermectin has been successful is lying.

And if this is the case with you, what do they have to gain by lying?
38 posted on 09/29/2021 2:04:09 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Look, just get the pure data. If you don’t have pure data you have nothing at all.
.........................................
Really? I think these folks would refute that notion!

https://rairfoundation.com/medical-tyranny-hospitals-refuse-life-saving-ivermectin-families-fight-for-the-lives-of-their-loved-ones-video/


39 posted on 09/29/2021 2:28:27 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I want to the ER this morning to have my Covid status reviewed, just to be sure no breathing issues might be looming as the weekend came. (I was diagnosed on 9/21.)

All checked out fine. Oxygen at 96. BP 114/68. Chest x-ray fine. As the attending doctor reviewed it with me before I left, I confessed to be taking ivermectin and expected to be scolded.

Instead, she said, “Good!”, and asked the dosage. She said, “That’s exactly how I would prescribe it. You’re doing fine.” I was shocked. She appeared to be Indian, although her name wasn’t.


40 posted on 09/29/2021 2:39:33 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (“If TPTB can force you to take a shot, what CAN'T they force you to take?” - T. Carlson (paraphrased)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson