Replies

The discussion is not about vax.

It’s about the absence of clinical trials for Ivermectin. It is strictly about the absence of clinical trials for Ivermectin.

There are no trials for Coca Cola vs Covid. There are no trials of Aspirin vs Covid. There are no trials of Vicks Vaporub vs Covid.

If you have no trials you have nothing. Don’t pretend you have something when you have nothing.

Trials are 3 phases. Phase I examines the tested item for toxicity. Does it do any harm. Phase II examines the tested item for actual positive results at a dose level equal to what was used in Phase I. How positive does not matter. There simply must be positive results after a double blind trial.

And Phase III compares the magnitude of positive results, if there are any, to the results obtained by the currently in place standard treatment. If the results are inferior, it fails. If the results are superior, it becomes the new currently in place standard treatment.

I don’t know why “peer reviewed” is mentioned in association with this because it’s not relevant. Peer review is something done to scientific article submission. Not clinical trials.

You must have successful trials or you have nothing. You are Coca Cola or Aspirin or Vicks VapoRub. You have the same evidence they have . . . none.

If you have no trials you have nothing. Don’t pretend you have something when you have nothing.

The requirement to depend solely on trials for your OK, when you have ample, real-life evidence that Ivermectin works is telling.

In addition to the real-life evidence that India has provided that Ivermectin works, you also have a myriad of Doctors that have focused solely on protocols who primary ingrediant is Ivermectin. With all of these Doctor's practices, their success rate defined by recovery from COVID-19, lack of deaths, and lack of serious injuries is amazing. But you would have us ignore that, or worse, lie about it stating it is not proof.

BTW, those trials you speak of, who is doing the trials, and how long do they take?

I ask, because if BIG-Pharma is involved in any way, they cannot be trusted.

And why not use something in the near-term, while we wait for your trials to be completed, if ever, unless of course, you believe that everyone who is proclaiming that their experience with Ivermectin has been successful is lying.

And if this is the case with you, what do they have to gain by lying?