Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indictment Shows that John Durham Is Going After More People than Michael Sussmann
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com ^ | 17 September 2021 | By Larry Johnson

Posted on 09/17/2021 12:55:41 PM PDT by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Interesting. Hard to know for sure until it gets public, but this part jumps out: "Tech Executive- 1 was a powerful figure at both companies". Which "both" companies?

Maybe you could consider Instagram and Facebook two companies, but FB bought IG in 2012. They are really one company. Google has many subsidiaries, could they be considered separate?

Jack Dorsey does in fact control 2 separate Tech Companies, Twitter and Square. Not sure how Square could fit into the scheme though. Perhaps they buy access to data from other companies.

There are other possibilities I'm sure. If I had to guess, I'd say maybe only Google or one of the major telecoms would have the best capabilities to dig through data but Trump was also very active on the social platforms so...

21 posted on 09/17/2021 1:25:45 PM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

People need to remember, they thought they were going to win. They were going to use this against Trump after he was defeated. He wouldn’t have been able to fight it near as well and they intended to put an innocent citizen of the United States in prison. Likely for life.


22 posted on 09/17/2021 1:26:28 PM PDT by toast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Didn’t this guy Sussman Die in a Car Accident next week??


23 posted on 09/17/2021 1:27:24 PM PDT by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Crowdstrike. Hopefully it will be the end of that scumbag company.


24 posted on 09/17/2021 1:29:26 PM PDT by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Bkmk


25 posted on 09/17/2021 1:29:45 PM PDT by smvoice (King Joege: He's really quite mad you know )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The indictment states he was acting at the behest of the Tech Executive and Hillary.

I've seen reports the "tech executive" is Shawn Henry, a former FBI agent (appointed as Mueller as Executive Assistant Director of the Criminal, Cyber, Response and Services Branch, leaving his position as Assistant Director In Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Washington Field Office)

Henry then retired from the FBI in 2012 and joined Crowdstrike

You'll remember Crowdstrike from being the keeper of the DNC's server that was "hacked by the Russians" LOL.

26 posted on 09/17/2021 1:32:54 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vivenne

In order to show Zuckerman the respect he deserves I mangle his name.


27 posted on 09/17/2021 1:35:25 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

If this is true, then Mr. Durham should CCW and have a security detail.

Arkincide is not a pretty thing. Just ask Vince Foster and Jeffrey Epstein.

Oh wait, my bad.

5.56mm


28 posted on 09/17/2021 1:47:48 PM PDT by M Kehoe (Quid Pro Joe and the Ho need to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

‘Received a flaming bag of dog poop”

That reminds me…..Christmas is coming and I have to get presents for Democrats.


29 posted on 09/17/2021 1:54:53 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

30 posted on 09/17/2021 2:05:06 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Henry then retired from the FBI in 2012 and joined Crowdstrike

You’ll remember Crowdstrike from being the keeper of the DNC’s server that was “hacked by the Russians” LOL.

—-——
Hmmm.


31 posted on 09/17/2021 2:05:54 PM PDT by rdl6989 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

give us the highlights of what he said


32 posted on 09/17/2021 2:08:19 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Lmao!

I’m saving that one.


33 posted on 09/17/2021 2:16:29 PM PDT by White Lives Matter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Zuckerbucks” has a nice ring to it.


34 posted on 09/17/2021 3:05:17 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (No nation that sanctions the wholesale slaughter of its unborn citizens is fit to endure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

because this indictment is under the wire for limits, does the indictment open the door to other indictments now, or are they moot


35 posted on 09/17/2021 3:07:47 PM PDT by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. P144:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode; Avalon Memories; samadams2000
He was using “non-public” data that was obtained from a Federal government research contract. This may refer to the searches flagged by NSA Director at the time, Mike Rogers, who acted to shutdown the access once he learned that “contractors” were conducting illegal searches.

If this is the case, then more serious charges could be waiting, for which the statute of limitations is much longer.

36 posted on 09/17/2021 4:08:19 PM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr

thx...


37 posted on 09/17/2021 4:31:45 PM PDT by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. P144:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Chode
because this indictment is under the wire for limits, does the indictment open the door to other indictments now, or are they moot.

The statute of limitations was for lying to the FBI for this particular incident. Other cases will have different dates, cases, and charges.


38 posted on 09/17/2021 6:00:16 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: bagster

thx


39 posted on 09/17/2021 6:09:02 PM PDT by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. P144:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Chode

if the charge in other cases is conspiracy the statute of limitations begins to run fron the last act in the conspiracy..thus likely more time

Conspiracy is a continuing offense. For statutes such as 18 U.S.C. § 371, which require an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, the statute of limitations begins to run on the date of the last overt act. See Fiswick v. United States, 329 U.S. 211 (1946); United States v. Butler, 792 F.2d 1528 (11th Cir. 1986). For conspiracy statutes which do not require proof of an overt act, such as RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1961) or 21 U.S.C. § 846, the government must allege and prove that the conspiracy continued into the limitations period. The crucial question in this regard is the scope of the conspiratorial agreement, and the conspiracy is deemed to continue until its purpose has been achieved or abandoned. See United States v. Northern Imp. Co., 814 F.2d 540 (8th Cir. 1987); United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 (1984).

An individual’s “withdrawal” from a conspiracy starts the statute of limitations running as to that individual. “Withdrawal” from a conspiracy for this purpose means that the conspirator must take affirmative action by making a clean breast to the authorities or communicating his or her disassociation to the other conspirators. See United States v. Gonzalez, 797 F.2d

https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-652-statute-limitations-conspiracy


40 posted on 09/17/2021 6:25:21 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson