Skip to comments.
What if It’s Proven that Joe Biden and the Democrats Didn’t Win the 2020 Election But They Refuse to Give Up Power?
TGP ^
| August 20, 2021
| Joe Hoft
Posted on 08/20/2021 11:08:47 AM PDT by Boomer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-117 last
To: Georgia Girl 2
It’s a really interesting layer now.
When we see real evidence of the steal comign out of the audits ...
When a really significant percentage of the people think, “He’s awful. She’s awful. I really wish they weren’t in charge. And besides, they stole it” ...
When the rank and file military says, “This jerk humiliated us, he doesn’t care about us, he doesn’t care about America, he’s making us weaker” ...
And the top military says, “Joe’s our guy”.
Then what happens?
101
posted on
08/20/2021 2:03:05 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(We have two Democrat parties. 50% of the US population has no political representation.)
To: DoodleDawg
Do federal prosecutors have to wait for someone like Lindell to bring the evidence to them, or can they read it in the news like Obama does and take action on their own volition and then subpoena Lindell for his data?
-PJ
102
posted on
08/20/2021 2:06:05 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(* LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: ClearCase_guy
I don’t think the military is going to say that. Trump is traveling openly in a full presidential motorcade and being treated like the President wherever he goes. So somebody is protecting DJT. Otherwise he’d already be dead.
103
posted on
08/20/2021 2:07:41 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: HamiltonJay
104
posted on
08/20/2021 2:09:42 PM PDT
by
crusher
(GREEN: Globaloney for the Gullible)
To: HamiltonJay
Not right but that’s the truthYup. They can, they should, and they won't...
To: Boomer
I've seen several "Experts" say there is no Constitutional remedy for our situation.
I believe the Second Amendment covers it.
106
posted on
08/20/2021 2:58:26 PM PDT
by
Feckless
(The US Gubbmint / This Tagline CENSORED by FR \ IrOnic, ain't it?)
To: Boomer
There will definitely be many outraged keyboard warriors posting here and all over the internet, then we will all calm down and eat our peas.
107
posted on
08/20/2021 6:01:17 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Many Republicans are secretly Democrats, no Democrats are secretly Republicans. Dan Bongino.)
To: Safrguns
I suspect we have already found out, and just cannot believe the answer. Yep.
108
posted on
08/20/2021 6:07:44 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Many Republicans are secretly Democrats, no Democrats are secretly Republicans. Dan Bongino.)
To: nickcarraway
Show me where in the Constitution it says that if fraud is discovered in an election, the results are reversed? OK but first show me where it says killing babies is legal. Don't pretend we are a Constitutional Republic anymore, we are not, we are currently living under martial law light, soon to be full blown.
109
posted on
08/20/2021 6:16:16 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Many Republicans are secretly Democrats, no Democrats are secretly Republicans. Dan Bongino.)
To: Boomer
There is no Constitutional mechanism to accomplish removal, save impeachment which is not going to happen. So what you are talking about is extra Constitutional methods. Ho there and go there and the Constitution is rendered meaningless.
To: xkaydet65
Is there a constitutional method to blatantly alter the election results and get away with it?
We allow these representatives to hold their positions to steer things in the right direction. When they do the opposite like obama did and now Oxiden who is even worse; Americans have a duty to demand they step down and the rightful President be sworn in.
111
posted on
08/20/2021 8:40:53 PM PDT
by
Boomer
(Leftists/Leftism ruins everything it touches. Leftism is a toxic moral pestilence.)
To: Boomer
112
posted on
08/20/2021 8:59:06 PM PDT
by
NetAddicted
( Just looking)
To: Political Junkie Too
Do federal prosecutors have to wait for someone like Lindell to bring the evidence to them, or can they read it in the news like Obama does and take action on their own volition and then subpoena Lindell for his data? No.
To: DoodleDawg
Well, that's unhelpful.
It was an either/or question.
-PJ
114
posted on
08/21/2021 9:03:44 AM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(* LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: Political Junkie Too
It was an either/or question. No, they don't have to wait. Yes they can use Lindell's evidence if he provides it and if it is useful.
WHAT IF.........
You have to prove the WHAT IF before any other actions can
be taken. So far that hasn't been done in a legal manner via
courts, etc.
Next election, NOV. 3, 2024. That is what the GOP needs to
be concentrating on and bringing together the various support
groups together. Winning that election should be the top GOAL
at this time. The legal mess of the 2020 election needs to be
per-sued and actions taken to eliminate future happens. History
is history and the future is what we have to look towards.
jmo
116
posted on
08/21/2021 9:22:39 AM PDT
by
deport
( )
To: DoodleDawg
Thanks. That's what I thought.
-PJ
117
posted on
08/21/2021 9:27:15 AM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(* LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-117 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson