Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jovan Pulitzer Reveals It’s Not the ‘Watermarks’ on the Ballots – It’s Better (VIDEO)
Gateway Pundit ^ | August 19, 2021 | Joe Hoft

Posted on 08/20/2021 10:42:03 AM PDT by kellymcneill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: SkyDancer

Or reaping his heavenly reward in the fires of hell.


21 posted on 08/20/2021 11:09:24 AM PDT by mcshot (What was once thought impossible is now here. The possibilities are frightening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kellymcneill

Ohhhhh. This would explain why they were keeping their methods secret. When I heard about the secrecy I was miffed: why can’t everything just be done in the open using agreed methods? Now I know.


22 posted on 08/20/2021 11:13:25 AM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellymcneill

Oh noes! The printer Is going to be traced back to the Oval Office last November and Trump will be impeached again.


23 posted on 08/20/2021 11:14:00 AM PDT by StAntKnee (Add your own danged sarc tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
This thing about secret markings from printers has been out for about 8 months, right? And gone nowhere.

They just finished inspecting and scanning the ballots weeks ago and then had to go through all the scans, 2 million of them.

24 posted on 08/20/2021 11:15:57 AM PDT by Pollard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mcshot

Under Hell.


25 posted on 08/20/2021 11:23:26 AM PDT by SkyDancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I know right? Just get on with issuing the report and tell us who won AZ already.


26 posted on 08/20/2021 11:31:23 AM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IllumiNaughtyByNature

I see what you did there! (wink!wink!)


27 posted on 08/20/2021 11:32:44 AM PDT by nfldgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kellymcneill

I would be very interested in exactly how this identification works. I wonder if you could scan something that had been printed, and have a program spit out the data for you.


28 posted on 08/20/2021 11:36:07 AM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VastRWCon

// “will be provided to the Arizona Senate on Friday”

You only release stuff you want to be buried over the weekend on friday.


29 posted on 08/20/2021 11:37:05 AM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry; All

That’s been in several discussion ³threads here and elsewhere for several months.

Anticounterfeit laws were passed in the early 2000s in response to the manufacture of very high resolution printers. All printers are required to embed microcode in printing, undetectable by the human eye and by conventional magnification. It can be read under certain classified light frequencies.

That is part of what JHP’s team has examined and analyzed.

The information in the microcode records in part: date-time, machine ID, machine location, ink source. There are other data items undisclosed to the public.

In my assessment, the kinematic artifact analysis of JHP is important but new to courts whereas the microcode required by law is prima facie evidence admissible in court.

I also believe Psychiatrist and Intel Officer Steve Pieczenik was given material to use as a “THROW” to send enemy dogs scampering to conclude it was a ridiculous conspiracy theory. Whether Pieczenik knew or not IDK but I suspect not, I think he was used. The coup cartel was left smiling thinking there was nothing to worry over. Meanwhile, JHP and team are gathering statutory microcode data.

Spook world is intriguing but dangerous. JHP and team have bodyguards wherever whenever they travel and their origins and destinations are kept secret.


30 posted on 08/20/2021 11:44:43 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

This tech has been “out there” since the 80’s.


31 posted on 08/20/2021 11:54:13 AM PDT by A Voice (As it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be in the end times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellymcneill

Devised by the Secret Service? Isn’t that just the people that guard the President?


32 posted on 08/20/2021 11:55:17 AM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear
The Secret Service is mandated by Congress with two distinct and critical national security missions: protecting the nation's leaders and safeguarding the financial and critical infrastructure of the United States.
33 posted on 08/20/2021 11:57:28 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: A Voice

What I meant was — about 8 months ago, our side said: “We have them now! See? There’s this long-standing technology that secretly identifies the computer printer that produced the printout!! So we can tell which ballots were faked!! We have them now!! The 2020 election stolen — and we have the proof!!!!!!!!”

Big story today, 8 months later: same as above.

Show me. Why aren’t they showing me? It’s not against the rules to show me.


34 posted on 08/20/2021 11:58:37 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (We have two Democrat parties. 50% of the US population has no political representation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: kellymcneill

“The matrix decodes the placement of the markings and reveals the precise identity of the printer BY SERIAL NUMBER...”

Ok, so if you have a group of suspect printers, that would be possible to check. But if printed by just some printer, how would investigators determine where that printer as and who owned it? Or operated it? And wouldn’t the guilty parties destroy their printers and get rid of the remains and any paper trail from purchase?


35 posted on 08/20/2021 12:06:50 PM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear
The Secret Service is in charge of investigating counterfeiting of US Currency
36 posted on 08/20/2021 12:09:47 PM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

My bad. Apparently the wheels of justice turn ever so slowly.


37 posted on 08/20/2021 12:09:57 PM PDT by A Voice (As it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be in the end times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

“Spook world is intriguing but dangerous.”

And there is no line the CIA will not cross. Today’s headline.

CIA Gave Afghan Warlords Viagra to Help Them ‘Rape More Boys More Often’

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62478


38 posted on 08/20/2021 12:18:05 PM PDT by BushCountry (thinks he needs a gal whose name doesn't end in ".jpg")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy; A Voice; All

The microcode is on the ballots. The ballots were not available at the time of your complaint.


39 posted on 08/20/2021 12:31:49 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

I’m not going to press it, because I’m just an ignorant guy on the internet who really doesn’t “know” anything, but it seems to me ...

The ballots were available Nov 3.
People started thinking that some of the so-called ballots were pulled out of thin air, in some states they were pulled out of suitcases stashed under tables. These potentially manufactured ballots were a concern in Nov and Dec.
And some people, right away, were basically saying “AHA! What those fools don’t know is that printers mark up paper that they print, and if we get our hands on that paper we can prove their point of origin! Those cheaters are screwed!”

So, I don’t know when the ballots became available to us, but the concept that it might play out this way has been talked about for many months. And as far as I can tell, it’s just talk, and just an internet theory from some people who haven’t shown anything concrete.


40 posted on 08/20/2021 12:40:08 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (We have two Democrat parties. 50% of the US population has no political representation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson