Posted on 07/30/2021 7:39:01 AM PDT by Starman417
As illegal aliens pour into this country through an open Southern border, a new mask mandate is coming and they say it's all about science. Minority leader Kevin McCarthy disputed the need for a new mask mandate and Nancy Pelosi called him a moron.
"Science, science, science" she said.
About that science...
WASHINGTON - Director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Dr. Rochelle Walensky expressed concern over new data that shows that vaccinated and unvaccinated people infected by the delta variant of the novel coronavirus carry viral loads that "are actually quite similar." "We are actively conducting outbreak investigations of what’s occurring in places that are having clusters... What we’ve learned in that context, is when we examine the rare breakthrough infections and we look at the amount of virus in those people, it’s pretty similar to the amount of virus in unvaccinated people," Walensky said.Great. "Rare breakthrough infections." Many were asking where is the data? I know more than a little about research and I was also asking. Thus far, all we've got is this thing from India
At least one of the studies that was cited by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to justify changing their guidance on masks was based on a vaccine that is not authorized for use in America and was rejected by a peer review. The study in question from researchers in India analyzed vaccine breakthrough in over 100 healthcare workers and claims to show that a COVID-19 Delta variant infection generates a higher viral load in comparison to other variants.And here's the money partDespite no mention in the study of viral loads from the variant against unvaccinated individuals, the CDC cited it in yesterday’s updated brief as evidence that the Delta variant is transmissible from a vaccinated individual with a breakthrough infection.
“Studies from India with vaccines not authorized for use in the United States have noted relatively high viral loads and larger cluster sizes associated with infections with Delta, regardless of vaccination status,” the CDC said.Fauci is now down to guessing“These early data suggest that breakthrough Delta infections are transmissible,” the CDC’s brief goes on to say, even though the India study was conducted with a non-approved U.S. vaccine.
Back in April, the CDC said this
After warning for months that vaccinated people should still be cautious in order to not infect others, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention suggests they may not be at much risk of transmitting the coronavirus.Americans, young and old, regardless of the data, are going to be forced to wear masks again. If you're a COVID positive illegal, however, you are under no such restrictions.“Vaccinated people do not carry the virus — they don’t get sick,” Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the CDC, told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow on Tuesday. That’s “not just in the clinical trials, but it’s also in real-world data.”
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...
Getting the border back open is why both parties colluded to cheat Trump out.
“Until the border is sealed you can shove your mask mandate”
Even if it is sealed you can still shove it!
Masks. Do. Not. Work. Cannot be repeated enough.
Even so, futile measures like masks are like a finger in the dike when a tsunami wave is coming your way. The dike is going to be overrun anyway.
We’re all gonna die....
AMEN!
More hysterics from the Marxist Communist Tyrants.
Getting the border back open is why both parties colluded to cheat Trump out.
*************
If that was their goal then they succeeded.
How many eight year old girls did President Xi send to Biden’s room in China?
Once you know the answer to that question, all of Biden’s actions will make sense.
(E Pluribus Uranus, this is called "sarcasm", so don't freak out.)
Through April 2020, the official recommendation by the Journal of the American Medical Association was was unambiguous:
“Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill.”
Part of that lack of evidence in fact showed that cloth facemasks actually increased influenza-linked illness.
In contravention to established science, States, municipalities and businesses have violated the legal requirements for the promulgation of medical counter measures during a public health emergency stating a “belief” that face masks limit the spread of SARS CoV-2. To date, not a single study has confirmed that a mask prevented the transmission of, or the infection by SARS CoV-2. Simply stated, a "belief" is not a medical countermeasure.
All parties mandating the use of facemasks are not only willfully ignoring established science but are engaging in what amounts to a whole population clinical trial. This conclusion is reached by the fact that facemask use and COVID-19 incidence are being reported in scientific opinion pieces promoted by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and others.
Social Distancing
Social distancing of up to 6 feet has been promoted as a means of preventing person-to-person transmission of influenza-like viruses. While one study (Werner E. Bischoff, Katrina Swett, Iris Leng, Timothy R. Peters, Exposure to Influenza Virus Aerosols During Routine Patient Care, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 207, Issue 7, 1 April 2013, Pages 1037-1046,) hypothesized that infection could happen in a 6 foot range, the study explicitly states that person-to-person transfer was not tested and viability of the virus at 6 feet was not even a subject of the investigation.
That did not stop the misrepresentation of the study to be used as the basis for an unverified medical counter measure of social distancing. To date, no study has established the efficacy of social distancing to modify the transmission of SARS CoV-2. Public health officials have merely referenced this article.
In contravention to established science, States, municipalities and businesses have violated the legal requirements for the promulgation of medical counter measures during a public health emergency stating a “belief” that social distancing of a healthy population limits the spread of SARS CoV-2. To date, not a single study has confirmed that social distancing of any population prevented the transmission of, or the infection by SARS CoV-2.
FTC Act
It is unlawful under the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 41 et seq., to advertise that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made. As a result, every party promoting the use of face masks is violating the FTC Act.
Further, under 21 CFR § 50.24 et seq., it is unlawful to conduct medical research (even in the case of emergency) without a series of steps taken to:
a. Establish the research with a duly authorized and independent institutional review board;
b. Secure informed consent of all participants including a statement of risks and benefits; and,
c. Engage in consultation with the community in which the study is to be conducted.
All of these laws have been broken. All relevant authorities in the United States must cease and desist the use of face masks until the matters above are rectified.
Establishment Clause
Finally, the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment states:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
Forcing someone to "believe" that a thing might work not based on facts but based on a belief alone is tantamount to a religion and is prohibited without limitation. Not even the Supreme Court's seminal decision on vaccines, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), alters this fact.
Reason and an ordered society demand the current wall of bravo sierra regarding SARS-CoV-2 be challenged and torn down down brick by brick.
Something I’ve been saying since day one. If CV19 truly is the killer they say it is, having an open southern border would be criminal.
The fact that anyone can walk across the border tells me that CV19 is strictly a political issue.
Ever notice in pictures where some officials are wearing their mask under their nose? What’s with that? I’ve seen others wearing their mask the same way.
An open border assures constant virus re-infection !
They know it,.. and the regime could care less about the citizenry.
They want illegals to swamp the system and bankrupt it !(Coward-Piven).
That's how we get driven involuntarily into " The Great Reset !"
This is similar to a November, 1941, BabylonBee news story, "U.S. military helps transport Japanese troops without notice into Hawaiian communities."
That and his America first policy
Here’s an idea... why not enforce the law? Then everything else goes away?
Exactly!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.