Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Coming “January 6” Train Wreck
JamesBovard.com blog ^ | &-24-2021 | James Bovard

Posted on 07/24/2021 9:47:20 AM PDT by blam

The January 6 Capitol clash may be the gift that keeps on giving to cynics everywhere. In the coming months, Americans will likely see jaw-dropping bureaucratic debacles, stunning abuses by federal prosecutors, and appalling bloodlust by angry Biden supporters. Perhaps the least likely outcome is that the coming train wreck will restore faith in American democracy.

The Justice Department declared last week, “The investigation and prosecution of the Capitol Breach will be the largest in American history, both in terms of the number of defendants prosecuted and the nature and volume of the evidence.” The feds are sorting through “237,000 digital tips, 1 million Parler videos and images comprising 40 terabytes of data scraped from the Internet — roughly equivalent to 10 million photos, 20,000 hours of video, or 50,000 filing cabinets of paper documents,” theWashington Post reported. Investigators are also sorting through “cell tower data for thousands of electronic devices that connected to the Capitol’s interior distributed antenna system,” information provided by phone companies, Google, and other data aggregation companies. The problem will be compounded because many government employees are slow readers.

More than 500 protestors have already been charged in federal court, but their trials will likely be delayed at least until next year. Federal judge John Bates recently warned that evidence snafus could result in judges “going on the warpath.” If judges conclude that the Justice Department is unreasonably keeping January 6 defendants locked up (often in solitary confinement) too long, judicial edicts could unravel prosecutors’ long-term plans.

Federal cases against January 6 protestors are being built on what one savvy electronic evidence consultant called a “Tower of Babel nightmare.” While federal agents gloated at the 300,000 plus tips that poured into the FBI with regards to January 6 protestors, prosecutors are obliged to sift the hairballs and provide each defendant and their lawyers with potentially exculpatory evidence. The biggest data dump on record will likely spur a deluge of inadvertent or intentional withholding of evidence. The Justice Department recently notified defense lawyers that they would have to “build a system to receive the data” the feds delivered. The prosecution is also whining because a federal judge prevented them from relying on a private contractor to organize secret grand jury evidence.

The Justice Department may be delaying release of the bulk of the more than 14,000 hours of video surveillance from inside the Capitol on January 6 in an attempt to preserve Biden’s “domestic terrorism” storyline of that day’s events. Even before Trump supporters poured into the Capitol that day, Democrats were accusing them of sedition for filing legal challenges to the 2020 election results, including popular Twitter hashtags such as #GOPSeditiousTraitors and #TreasonAgainstAmerica. After the mob delayed congressional proceedings for six hours, congressional leaders compared the interruption to the 9/11 attacks, Pearl Harbor, and the War of 1812. The Justice Department may also be foot-dragging on releasing evidence because it is reluctant to disclose what role, if any, federal informants or undercover agents had in instigating or propagating violence that day.

For January 6 defendants, federal prosecutors are using a simple formula: Trespassing plus thought crimes equals terrorism. On Monday, Paul Hodgkins was sentenced to 8 months in prison, though the feds admitted he was guilty simply of taking selfies, wearing a Trump T-shirt, and carrying a Trump flag into the Senate chamber and “did not personally engage in or espouse violence or property destruction.” Though Hodgkins pled guilty only to one count of obstructing an official proceeding, Biden’s Justice Department demanded a lengthy prison sentence for Hodgkins to “deter…domestic terrorism.” This is akin to prosecutors seeking harsh punishment for a confessed jaywalker because his negligent behavior could have caused a school bus to crash.

At the same time the Justice Department is bumbling towards paralysis, many Americans are howling for the heads of January 6 defendants. In his Gulag Archipelago, Alexander Solzhenitsyn described the vast public outrage that went along with a prominent Soviet show trial of accused wreckers: “There were universal meetings and demonstrations (including even school-children). It was the newspaper march of millions, and the roar rose outside the windows of the courtroom: ‘Death! Death! Death!’” The same spectacle has been stark on Twitter and in the comment section of the Washington Post, among other places.

One Washington Postcommenter declared that “the only effective way for the government to respond to an act of war by domestic terrorists is to be prepared to meet them with machine guns and flamethrowers and mow them down. Not one of those terrorists who broke through police lines [on January 6] should have escaped alive.” Hodgkins’s sentence terrified and enraged Post readers. One wrote, “The pitiful 8 month sentence scares me badly… I’m afraid the government is losing its ability to protect us from madmen (consider the mentally ill and tweakers roaming our streets untreated) and right wing Q inspired terrorists.” Another commented, “He should have been given the death penalty for sedition.” As always, one commenter even reached back to the Nazis for an analogy, writing, “It is comparable to the 9 months that Adolf Hitler served after his participation in an attempted 1923 putsch against the German government. Remember how that turned out?”

Federal judge Randolph Moss, when he sentenced Hodgkins, declared that his action will make it “harder for all of us to tell our children and grandchildren that democracy stands as the immutable foundation of our nation.” Unfortunately, judges seem nonchalant when American democracy is subverted instead by federal agencies. After FBI Assistant General Counsel Kevin Clinesmith admitted falsifying key evidence to get a FISA warrant to spy on the Trump presidential campaign, federal judge James Boasberg gushed with sympathy at the sentencing hearing: “Mr. Clinesmith has lost his job in government service—what has given his life much of its meaning.” Scorning the recommendation of the federal prosecutor (who said the “resulting harm is immeasurable recommendation” from Clinesmith’s action), Boasberg gave Clinesmith a wrist slap—400 hours of community service and 12 months of probation. The Justice Department Inspector General documented many other abuses of power and deceit by FBI officials in the Hillary Clinton or Trump investigations, but not a single FBI official has spent a day behind bars.

Will Justice Department prosecutors be caught in a Catch-22, pressured by the White House to harvest as many scalps as possible but crippled by the lack of proof that most of the accused were guilty of anything besides trespassing or “willfully and knowingly parading” in the Capitol? Political pressure for high-profile convictions resulted in disastrous courtroom defeats for federal attorneys prosecuting Ruby Ridge, the Branch Davidian standoff at Waco, and other cases. If juries rebuff prosecutors on more than a few January 6 cases, then the entire political storyline could quickly collapse.

Federal prosecutor Mona Sedky is calling for harsh punishment for January 6 defendants because of “the need to preserve respect for the law.” But at this point, “respect for the law” is a loss leader in this process. That won’t be remedied when people realize that taking selfies can result in a federal sentencing enhancement.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: backlash; capitol; crock; jamesboasberg; jamesbovard; jan6; liberaljusges; mockery; monasedky; paulhodgkins; randolphmoss; riots; stalinist; starchamber
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
I wonder if Henry Bowman was amoung those arrested?
1 posted on 07/24/2021 9:47:20 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

“The problem will be compounded because many government employees are slow readers.”

LOL! As an ex-Fed and Ex-State worker, I’ve seen that, first hand!


2 posted on 07/24/2021 9:50:55 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Putin Asks Reporter If USA, 'Assassinated' Ashli Babbitt!’

Townhall.com ^ | June 15, 2021 | Leah Barkoukis

During an interview with NBC News, Putin said Russia was no worse than the United States in this regard, and used the government's handling of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot as an example.

Putin showed flashes of defiance when he was asked whether it was a "coincidence" that several other political rivals had been assassinated in recent years.

"We don't have this kind of habit, of assassinating anybody," Putin said when he was asked whether he ordered Navalny killed. (NBC News)

He then countered by asking whether the U.S. was guilty of assassinating Ashli Babbitt during the Capitol riot.

"Secondly, I want to ask you: Did you order the assassination of the woman who walked into the Congress and who was shot and killed by a policeman?” Putin said. “Do you know that 450 individuals were arrested after entering Congress? And they didn’t go there to steal a laptop. They came with political demands. 450 people have been detained. They’re facing jail time, from 15 to 20 years. And they came to Congress with political demands. Isn’t that persecution for political opinions?"

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2021/06/15/putin-ashli-babbitt-n2591004

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3967964/posts

"Someone needs to ask FBI liar, Chris Wray, how many of the US Capitol protesters were paid informants for the FBI?"

Biden Frees Al Qaeda Commander Who Blew Up Buddhas ... And expressed support for killing Jews. 7/23/2021, 7:53:59 AM · by Red Badger · 5 replies

https://www.frontpagemag.com ^ | Fri Jul 23, 2021 | Daniel Greenfield

3 posted on 07/24/2021 9:55:24 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (If I wanted to live in China, Cuba, Canada or ?????! I would move there! Covid 19 über alles!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Federal prosecutor Mona Sedky is calling for harsh punishment for January 6 defendants because of “the need to preserve respect for the law.”

And she said this with a straight face?! After last summer?! After the 2020 fraud... I mean, election?!

4 posted on 07/24/2021 9:57:48 AM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The Jan 6 Hearings are intended by Democrats and like minded Republicans to cast political opposition as domestic terrorists and set the stage to use the entire suite of anti terror laws against the American people who oppose the very unpopular and destructive agenda they wish to impose on America. This agenda is so counter to American norms and the Constitution itself, they are contemplating use of force and coercion in addition tot he intimidation measures they are already using in their War from Above on the American people.

This agenda follows the one that has been used by the EU to bring it's member states to their knees and destroy the quality of life for the people of the EU

5 posted on 07/24/2021 9:58:37 AM PDT by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Stalin monster Great Purge show trials.


6 posted on 07/24/2021 9:59:18 AM PDT by AZJeep (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0AHGreco RomNQkryIIs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
"The feds are sorting through “237,000 digital tips, 1 million Parler videos and images comprising 40 terabytes of data scraped from the Internet — roughly equivalent to 10 million photos, 20,000 hours of video, or 50,000 filing cabinets of paper documents,”


THIS

is what I saw with that statement ;



7 posted on 07/24/2021 10:00:47 AM PDT by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

The next GOP president is going to pardon or commute most of the sentences, with many of the defendants getting a large payday curtosey of the US taxpayer.


8 posted on 07/24/2021 10:03:05 AM PDT by Thunder90 (All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sicon

Bernie bros have murdered more political opponents than all of the Jan 6 “insurrectionists”.


9 posted on 07/24/2021 10:04:38 AM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

I laughed out loud right there, too!


10 posted on 07/24/2021 10:04:39 AM PDT by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

..... If judges conclude that the Justice Department is unreasonably keeping January 6 defendants locked up (often in solitary confinement) too long, judicial edicts could unravel prosecutors’ long-term plans.....

Come on, judges! Step up to the plate for justice!!!! Order the immediate release of ALL Jan. 6 political prisoners!!!!

We are the USA—NOT the old Soviet Union or the current communist China! It’s high time to act like the USA—in defiance of the commie biden cabal!!!!


11 posted on 07/24/2021 10:05:58 AM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
"If judges conclude that the Justice Department is unreasonably keeping January 6 defendants locked up (often in solitary confinement) too long, judicial edicts could unravel prosecutors’ long-term plans."

One wonders what these "long-term plans" are. Do they have some scheme that goes beyond simply prosecuting these cases? Are they trying to lay the groundwork for some new approach to free speech and freedom of assembly cases, something that would allow prior restraint of unfavored speech? Or just what?
12 posted on 07/24/2021 10:06:26 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Why not parade all of them in chains while they sing the national anthem?


13 posted on 07/24/2021 10:07:50 AM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

Great idea. I second that.


14 posted on 07/24/2021 10:18:58 AM PDT by cockroach_magoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam

[[“The investigation and prosecution of the Capitol Breach will be the largest in American history, both in terms of the number of defendants prosecuted and the nature and volume of the evidence.” The feds are sorting through “237,000 digital tips, 1 million Parler videos and images comprising 40 terabytes of data scraped from the Internet — roughly equivalent to 10 million photos, 20,000 hours of video, or 50,000 filing cabinets of paper documents,” theWashington Post reported. Investigators are also sorting through “cell tower data for thousands of electronic devices that connected to the Capitol’s interior distributed antenna system,”]]

All this because some Trump supporters peacefully wanted to have their voices heard bythose who represent out country.

Have the fbi put this much effort into arresting and prosecuti g the actual do estic terrorists antifa and blm?


15 posted on 07/24/2021 10:25:31 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
I just went back and reviewed the article in Revolver News about Stewart Rhodes, the purported leader of the Oath Keepers, some of whose members have been charged with various crimes on January 6th.

The interesting thing is that Rhodes himself has NOT been charged despite him openly talking of "insurrection" and claiming that he had heavily armed supporters stationed at key places in and around DC, just waiting for the command from Trump to go into action.

Revolver News suggests that Rhodes has not been charged because he was an FBI informant or agitator whose rhetoric was intended to provoke the more unstable members of his group into some sort of illegal and violent actions, just the sort of actions that would be used to support the "insurrection" narrative. Any serious investigation of January 6th would include an examination of this man, but his role will no doubt be entirely ignored.
16 posted on 07/24/2021 10:31:20 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Federal prosecutor Mona Sedky is calling for harsh punishment for January 6 defendants because of “the need to preserve respect for the law.”

Karma baby, Karma!

17 posted on 07/24/2021 10:32:09 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator (Socialism should more accurately be called Sociopathism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Funny, the let can arm themselves, violently take over e r city blocks and then squares, and ‘occupy Wallstreet committing zl. Kinds of crimes, and the left call it ‘mostly peaceful and a ‘summer of love’ while blm burns loots murders, destroys, and assaults others, but when Trump supporters peacefully gather At the Capitol, then get personal,y ushered into the building by Capitol police and 5he vast majority of them do nothing worse than yell, the left fall all to pieces and scream about it being the worst thing ever.

Where are the gop? Why aren’t they screaming at the top of their lungs about this illegal political persedution?


18 posted on 07/24/2021 10:34:53 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Though Hodgkins pled guilty only to one count of obstructing an official proceeding, Biden’s Justice Department demanded a lengthy prison sentence for Hodgkins to “deter…domestic terrorism.” This is akin to prosecutors seeking harsh punishment for a confessed jaywalker because his negligent behavior could have caused a school bus to crash.

True. And they also made sure they found someone who was willing to include lots of remorse, so the others would take the hint and see that as a way to an easier sentence. This is important to the prosecution because it's excellent PR for their side: See? They are very sorry. Therefore it was very wrong.

19 posted on 07/24/2021 10:35:53 AM PDT by firebrand ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PistolPaknMama

Me three.


20 posted on 07/24/2021 10:37:57 AM PDT by Laslo Fripp (The Sybil of Free Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson