Posted on 07/14/2021 7:58:36 AM PDT by Fractal Trader
The thing that seems to be missing from this dire warning is that while the initial mRNA delivery is through a viral-like mechanism, ie. the mRNA coding is delivered into the injectee’s cells through an engineered molecule, the spike protein that is created from the mRNA does not have viral capability. It can’t reinfect new cells and cause an exponential increase in the number of spike proteins. The creation of the spike proteins is limited to the first generation created from the injected engineered molecules.
I can’t point to what is not there. My satirical point was that maybe this doomsayer might be right. Maybe he is wrong. We should have waited til we had long term studies to give the jab to such a huge percent of population. Empirical evidence is the king of science...not consensus. So we should not attack the doomsayers we should attack those pushing for using the majority of the world’s population as a guinea pig. Attacking the doomsayers won’t make us safer...the doomsayers might be right.
Years? That’s a really slow poison. Looking at our population, many will die in a few short years from heart failure and/or complications from diabetes.
So, if our younger set....say 20 - 50 year olds, begin to pass away from heart failure/clots/strokes, then you’ll call that a normal expectation?
What percent of that population are you saying would be expected to die, from these heart/clot/stroke related deaths, and it be ‘normal’?
cdc dawg....do you work for the cdc, or did you just get lucky with your initials? ;-)
Just curious.
OMG!! Someone send a medic to Central Va!
I took the Pfizer, double dose.. and, I also fe
Slow working Andromeda Strain.
Ping!
And far enough in the future for TPTB to deny any connection to the so-called vaccines.
have you run across anything which suggests ivermectin helps with spikes created by the mrna product?
Thinking forward to a situation where proof of vaccination may be de facto mandatory (either here or abroad) and how to mitigate the risks from it.
my idea would be simply dose ivermectin as if it were a confirmed viral infection vs. ‘just’ the mrna product.
I got the Pfizer and I feel fine.
So do I!
Why are you calling this person an imbecile? Could it be you took the poison and are now afraid, so you call him names?
If he is right, then who is the real imbecile?
“So all heart failure deaths in the future will be attributed to the shot...if they had it. Otherwise, just a natural death.”
The case for natural death is moot. Everyone either die of COVID or the vaccine(s).
Are you alright?
Ivermectin interferes with viral colonization and replication it seems…
*
I had the vid.
And I feel purple.
There are several similar articles with similar dire predictions written by competent doctors…one who won the Nobel prize and developed the rna vaccine…
You took an mRNA vaccine! You’ll be dead within 30 years! Panic! Flee! Fear!
Well, he isn’t right. He’s spouting ridiculous nonsense. So it’s him (the author).
The doctor who worked on developing the mRNA vaccine concept did NOT make dire predictions. He expressed concern for possible issues not yet known. And he took an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine himself. He weighed the risks and benefits and took the shot.
So what’s that tell you?
Stuff it, troll.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.